User talk:Pkbwcgs/Archive/December 2018

Template editor granted
Your account has been granted the "templateeditor" user permission, allowing you to edit templates and modules that have been protected with template protection. It also allows you to bypass the title blacklist, giving you the ability to create and edit editnotices. Before you use this user right, please read Template editor and make sure you understand its contents. In particular, you should read the section on wise template editing and the criteria for revocation.

You can use this user right to perform maintenance, answer edit requests, and make any other simple and generally uncontroversial edits to templates, modules, and edinotices. You can also use it to enact more complex or controversial edits, after those edits are first made to a test sandbox, and their technical reliability as well as their consensus among other informed editors has been established. If you are willing to process edit requests on templates and modules, keep in mind that you are taking responsibility to ensure the edits have consensus and are technically sound.

This user right gives you access to some of Wikipedia's most important templates and modules; it is critical that you edit them wisely and that you only make edits that are backed up by consensus. It is also very important that no one else be allowed to access your account, so you should consider taking a few moments to secure your password.

If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

If you were granted the permission on a temporary basis you will need to re-apply for the permission a few days before it expires including in your request a permalink to the discussion where it was granted and a ping for the administrator who granted the permission. You can find the permalink in your [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log/rights&page=User:Pkbwcgs rights log].


 * Useful links
 * All template-protected pages
 * User:AnomieBOT/TPERTable – outstanding template-protected edit requests (bot-generated)
 * Request fully-protected templates or modules be downgraded to template protection

Happy template editing! Primefac (talk) 15:11, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

Your BRFA
Hi Pkbwcgs, 2 of your bot tasks have been approved. Please wait until your bot "bot flagging" has been completed by a bureaucrat to begin the runs. Best regards, — xaosflux  Talk 16:44, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Pkbwcgs (talk) 16:49, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

Template:Infobox university
Hi Pkbwcgs. Don't get me wrong, I do appreciate your work merging Template:Infobox academic division to Template:Infobox university, but this is very high usage infobox so every mistake you make is reflected on tens of thousands of articles. Wouldn't it be better to work on the sandbox? Just a suggestion. --Muhandes (talk) 12:51, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.16 15 December 2018
Hello ,

This year's award for the Reviewer of the Year goes to. Around on Wikipedia since 2011, their staggering number of 26,554reviews over the past twelve months makes them, together with an additional total of 275,285edits, one of Wikipedia's most prolific users.
 * Reviewer of the Year
 * Thanks are also extended for their work to (15,059 reviews),  (12,760reviews),  (9,001reviews),  (8,440reviews),  (8,092reviews),   (5,306reviews),  (4,153 reviews),  (4,016reviews),  and  (3,615reviews)., , , and  have been New Page Reviewers for less than a year — Barkeep49 for only sevenmonths, while , with an edit count of 250,000 since she joined Wikipedia in 2008, has been a bastion of New Page Patrol for many years.

See also the list of top100 reviewers.

The backlog is now approaching 5,000, and still rising. There are around 640holders of the NPR flag, most of whom appear to be inactive. The 10% of the reviewers who do 90% of the work could do with some support especially as some of them are now taking a well deserved break.
 * Less good news, and an appeal for some help

At #1 position, the Community Wishlist poll closed on 3December with a resounding success for NPP, reminding the WMF and the volunteer communities just how critical NPP is to maintaining a clean encyclopedia and the need for improved tools to do it. A big 'thank you' to everyone who supported the NPP proposals. See the results.
 * Really good news - NPR wins the Community Wishlist Survey 2019

Due to a number of changes having been made to the feed since this three-minutevideo was created, we have been asked by the WMF for feedback on the video with a view to getting it brought up to date to reflect the new features of the system. Please leave your comments here, particularly mentioning how helpful you find it for new reviewers. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:14, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Training video

Your BRFA
Hello Pkbwcgs, your recent BRFA (Bots/Requests for approval/PkbwcgsBot 6) has been denied. Please see the closing notes on the BRFA. If you have any questions, please let me know. — xaosflux  Talk 00:19, 16 December 2018 (UTC)

WP:RFBOT
Your recent bot approvals request has been Approved. Please see the request page for details. Primefac (talk) 20:59, 16 December 2018 (UTC)

Your BRFA
Hello, your recent BRFA (Bots/Requests for approval/PkbwcgsBot 10) has been denied, see closing notes. — xaosflux  Talk 17:50, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

Your bot's edits
Hi. Recently, this edit your bot made showed up on my watchlist, and I noticed that the edit was not flagged as being made by a bot. Was that intentional? Happy holidays, --DannyS712 (talk) 15:53, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
 * My bot has the bot flag. See here. It is flagged as a bot in the recent changes. Pkbwcgs (talk) 15:56, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
 * this specific edit did not show up as a bot edit, as far as I can tell. --DannyS712 (talk) 16:00, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
 * There are bots on my watchlist as well. If you enable the "human (not bot)" filter on your watchlist, it should take my bot away from your watchlist. Please tell me if it doesn't. Pkbwcgs (talk) 16:05, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
 * I had that enabled already, but now its gone... must have been a glitch on my end. --DannyS712 (talk) 16:08, 28 December 2018 (UTC)