User talk:Pkbwcgs/Archive/January 2019

Happy New Year, Pkbwcgs!


Happy New Year! Pkbwcgs, Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.

Hhkohh (talk) 02:20, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Your BRFA
Hello, your recent BRFA (Bots/Requests for approval/PkbwcgsBot 16) has been approved. Happy editing, — xaosflux  Talk 14:34, 4 January 2019 (UTC)

Articles for Semi-Protection/Normani Kordei
That article is old I am done with it. Just delete it I do not care anymore. It has been over a year ago. Let someone else manage the page I do not care. The whole thing can be deleted for all I care. Just delete it or whatever or let someone else take care of it. I moved on to other things like editing other pages.--Welcometothenewmillenium (talk) 17:30, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Do you wish the same for Articles for Semi-Protection/Dinah Jane and Articles for Semi-Protection/Normani Kordei/Dinah Jane? Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 18:12, 8 January 2019 (UTC)

City Thameslink
Just a quick note, I have fleshed out the article a bit more so it's worth another look. I realise this is your first GA review, so I just wanted to say you're going about things exactly the right way - suggesting improvements and checking the article is well-written, factually accurate, broad in coverage and doesn't have any copyvios. The "broad in coverage" criteria does seem to get left out of reviews, so it's good to see it pick up attention here. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  18:15, 10 January 2019 (UTC)

Underpopulated template
Hi, I see your bot request to remove instances of the Underpopulated category following a consensus to delete in TfD, but someone or some bot has been removing them as the transclusion count has been continually dropping. It's confusing to me since it seems you had started a process to perform the removal but the template is being removed despite your initiative to handle it. Thanks. Star cheers peaks news lost wars Talk to me 22:48, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
 * User:BsherrAWBBOT is doing it. Thanks. Star cheers peaks news lost wars Talk to me 22:52, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

Strangeness with ISBN page updates
This is curious. When your bot updates WikiProject Check Wikipedia/ISBN errors, it typically adds or removes a few hundred bytes each day. But when WikiCleanerBot updates the page, the net change is ten or twenty thousand bytes. I have poked around at page histories for the pages that are added, and I really have no idea why that would be. – Jonesey95 (talk) 08:53, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
 * This is quite strange but I think User:NicoV adds new algorithms that can find more ISBN errors and my WPCleaner is only basic so it can't identify those errors. Pkbwcgs (talk) 15:54, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
 * This is normal, it's just that I'm only updating the list of ISBN errors just after a dump analysis (which updates pages like CHECKWIKI/WPC 069 dump). The dump analysis lets WPCleaner find ISBN errors that are not found by other tools (CW, templates checking ISBN...), that's why it makes a big difference. --NicoV (Talk on frwiki) 17:22, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thanks. I appreciate it. Pkbwcgs (talk) 17:04, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

Your BRFA
Hello Pkbwcgs, your BRFA (Bots/Requests for approval/PkbwcgsBot 20) has been approved. Happy editing, — xaosflux  Talk 20:41, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

Your BRFA
Hello Pkbwcgs, your BRFA (Bots/Requests for approval/PkbwcgsBot 18) has been approved. Happy editing, The SandDoctor  Talk 18:19, 29 January 2019 (UTC)