User talk:Pkczwriter

Fitness dog fighting
Wikipedia has a policy against original research and things that cannot be verified, which are both talked about in Attribution. (We've recently merged two separate core policies into this page, which is why it says it's still under discussion.) If this thing is as new as you say it is, it is by definition both of these things. Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought or of new theories/practices, but of things that are already notable and verifiable. If you can get it independently covered in what are considered reliable sources, it will certainly get an article someday. Grand master  ka  06:14, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Temperament test.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Temperament test.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:00, 28 June 2012 (UTC)