User talk:Pkornrei

Welcome! The two articles RETARDED POTENTIAL and ADVANCED POTENTIAL are to concepts I could not find on Wikipedia. Thy are well established concepts in the literature. I would like to use them as references. Therefore I created them. Instead of writing them directly on the Wikipedia page I wrote them using MS Word first and copied them into Wikipedia. They are only definitions, they are definitely not research articles.

Please tell me what you find wrong with the articles, I will correct them.

I will be back Monday 28 November 2011.

Philipp Kornreich

P.S.

I thing the General Theory of Relativity would have been posted without restriction if such a system where awvailable 100 years ago.

23 November 2011 16:57
 * They are offshoots of your original article. I suggest you discuss your future article creations on the Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Physics‎ showing how an article meets WP:GNG. Your work appears to be based on original research which does not belong on wikipedia. IRWolfie- (talk) 11:00, 26 November 2011 (UTC)

Phil's reply to article not belonging in Wikipedia. I would like to post this article and one future artiacle so taht it be available without copy rights, patent and other restrictions. Nobody should be able to claim ownership of this and the future article including me. People should be able to use and modify this article without any restrictions. I would prefere, if possible, to remove my name as author.

This article formulises the process of calculating delayed interaction. Many scientists have used Retarded and Advanced interactions to calculate delayed interactions. thus this is not actually new here. It just collecta these aproches in one formal proces. It does reinterprets the Advanced interaction showing that it actually is causal.It also shows the relation of interations with finite delay and the General Theory of Relativity.

It has been applied (elswere) to the calculation of the increase of the Lunar orbit by 38 mm per year in agrement with NASA measurements.

Philipp Kornreich

Hello, Pkornrei, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 17:21, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

New article
Based on this article creation, you appear to be attempting to upload a paper you have written from your hard drive directly to an article. This is not going to work for a variety of reasons:
 * 1) Wikipedia articles are written using the Wikipedia syntax; you cannot simply load a PDF file and hope that it will be understood as an article.
 * 2) There are special instructions on how to upload files.  Begin with the link in the toolbox (it should be on the left side of your Wikipedia page) that says "Upload file".  That will walk you through the process of uploading a file to Wikipedia.
 * 3) You really shouldn't publish your research paper on Wikipedia at all, because
 * 4) * you would be giving up all copyright claims to your research; and
 * 5) * Wikipedia does not publish original research.

Rather than continuing to try to upload this file, I would suggest writing a new Wikipedia article on the topic (assuming the topic is not already covered anywhere else on Wikipedia). If your paper has been published, you could use it as one of the cited sources in the Wikipedia article.

Good luck. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 17:21, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

=

Problems with upload of File:RctMchPap10Dec2010 html 2f170cae.gif
Thanks for uploading File:RctMchPap10Dec2010 html 2f170cae.gif. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:05, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Reaction mechanics for deletion
I will provide links to literature for conceptsapearing in my article Reaction Mechanics during thw week fro 7 to 11 November 2011.

Philipp Kornreich

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Reaction mechanics is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Reaction mechanics until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. TR 15:10, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

October 2011
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, such as on Talk:Reaction mechanics, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or  located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. ASCIIn2Bme (talk) 19:31, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or  located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 20:01, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Advanced interaction


The article Advanced interaction has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sparthorse (talk) 21:00, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Retarded interaction
Hello, Pkornrei, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia!

I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you worked on, Retarded interaction, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:


 * 1) edit the page
 * 2) remove the text that looks like this:
 * 3) save the page

It helps to explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you have any questions, feel free to ask on the Help Desk. Thanks again for contributing! Sparthorse (talk) 21:02, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

November 2011
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as you did at Reaction mechanics for point objects, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. There are numerous problems with the articles you have created, including the fact that Wikipedia is not a place to publish original ideas. Moreover, it is completely unacceptable to attempt to overturn consensus at a deletion discussion by simply ignoring the decision, and re-creating the same article under a new title. JamesBWatson (talk) 18:45, 24 November 2011 (UTC)

Repost of Advanced interaction
A tag has been placed on requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit |the page's discussion directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead recreating the page. Thank you. IRWolfie- (talk) 21:52, 25 November 2011 (UTC)

Repost of Retarded interaction
A tag has been placed on requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit |the page's discussion directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead recreating the page. Thank you. IRWolfie- (talk) 21:52, 25 November 2011 (UTC)

What did you think about the deletion notice you received?
Hi Pkornrei, You recently received a message about either "Nomination for deletion" or "Proposed deletion" of an article you created. I'd like to ask you a few quick questions: You can feel free to answer on my talk page or send me your response by email (mpinchuk@undefinedwikimedia.org). (I won't quote you or link your answers to your username if you don't feel comfortable with that.) Your feedback is incredibly useful for improving the content of deletion notifications, so please take a minute to think about and answer these questions. Thank you! Maryana (WMF) (talk) 00:44, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) Was the message helpful? Were the instructions clear and easy to follow?
 * 2) If not, how do you think the message could be improved?
 * 3) What do you think about the deletion process in general? Do you understand how to contest a deletion?