User talk:Plagio america- italia

Welcome!
Hello, Plagio america- italia, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Drmies (talk) 05:15, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

July 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Ellis (film) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 05:33, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Ellis (film) was changed by Plagio america- italia (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.913541 on 2016-07-27T05:33:49+00:00.

This is your only warning; if you introduce jokes into articles again, as you did at Ellis (film), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Rainbow Archer (talk) 05:40, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Edit-warring
Your recent editing history at Ellis (film) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Parsley Man (talk) 05:47, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 day for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:53, 27 July 2016 (UTC)