User talk:Plagktos

Disambiguation link notification for April 30
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Aristocratic and royal writings
 * added links pointing to Larousse, The Met, Proliferation and Synopsis


 * Caput lupinum
 * added a link pointing to Pariah


 * Daemonologie
 * added a link pointing to Sorcery

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Aristocratic writings
Your article was deleted, but I kept a copy of it if you want it to work from. The current state is well below the standards for an article. I suggest you slow down and look around some, work on small thing, before attempting such an ambitious article. Herostratus (talk) 01:48, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, Plagktos, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Herostratus (talk) 09:18, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

Thanks Plagktos (talk) 10:11, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 7
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Athens
 * added a link pointing to Capital


 * Beauty (ancient thought)
 * added a link pointing to Equinox Publishing


 * Come Swim
 * added a link pointing to St Vincent


 * Golden Age
 * added a link pointing to Kronos


 * Washoe Tribe of Nevada and California
 * added a link pointing to American Indians

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:46, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

Kristen Stewart short film
Hi. Please take a look at WP:MOSFILM. You keep adding lots of irrelevant information. Thanks.  Lugnuts  Fire Walk with Me 06:55, 23 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Can you please read the above link and also stop adding random rubbish to the article per this diff. If you continue to re-add this, you'll probably end up being blocked for edit warring. Please reply here to state you've understood this. Thanks.  Lugnuts  Fire Walk with Me 18:23, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

I've read your message, thanks. Plagktos (talk) 20:37, 25 May 2017 (UTC)


 * You've read it, but you continue to ignore the info at WP:MOSFILM. You keep adding all kinds of fan cruft and other rubbish to the article. Please stop.  Lugnuts  Fire Walk with Me 08:14, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

The work seems more an art-work in the sense of Video art, which indicated the manual of style isn't altogether applicable Plagktos (talk) 12:21, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

Linking
I reverted you here per WP:Overlinking and per the fact that we should not link to disambiguation pages unless it's in WP:Hatnote. See WP:Disambiguation. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 21:43, 30 May 2017 (UTC)


 * I see; orifice or introitus are unusual words, they would be unknowable to an everyday reader Plagktos (talk) 21:52, 30 May 2017 (UTC) the links don't fulfill the critria of OVERLINK, unless I missed something you want to highlight, and I was unaware the destination of either of the two was a disambiguation, so the second reason for revert is not applicable, since the link might be correctly destinated Plagktos (talk) 21:55, 30 May 2017 (UTC)


 * How is linking orifice or introitus needed when the article clearly states "the vaginal opening (orifice or introitus)"? The reader is told right there that these two terms mean "opening." The Introitus article, which is tiny, will not be telling readers anything new as far as the vagina goes. It is currently only composed of two sentences. And one of those sentences states, "The vaginal introitus is the opening that leads to the vaginal canal." Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 22:44, 30 May 2017 (UTC)


 * ok I'm looking at the links to verify Plagktos (talk) 22:50, 30 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Body orifice is an article which expands on the subject from orifice, Introitus is not only specific to the vagina, and therefore would be helpfully linked to indicate as such. Plagktos (talk) 22:52, 30 May 2017 (UTC)


 * It is not needed in the least. The Body orifice article states, "A body orifice is any opening in the body of an animal." All readers need to know about orifice or introitus in regard to the vagina is that it is an opening -- a vaginal opening. And like I stated, this is already abundantly clear to anyone who reads that sentence. They do not need to know about any other body orifices, although I'm certain they are aware of all of their body orifices. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 23:02, 30 May 2017 (UTC)


 * no way to know what a generic they (cover-all for a set of people, the number of which is increasing and is an unknowable number) - who you cannot know the knowledge of, as to whether they do or don't know such-and-such or anything else you presume, assume they might or might not. Also with respect to what they do and don't need to know ("They do not need to know about other any other body orifices...") in your mind they don't but actually people have many various and unknowable motivations for wanting to know things, and the various charachteristics of individuals determines different alignments to a subject, such that, what any one individual might not need to know, another, might instead, as a matter of fact, need to know. Plagktos (talk) 23:11, 30 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Seeing your discussion with Lugnuts above and your arguments to me above, it is clear that you do not listen. You are wrong on this matter per my arguments. And I am not going to waste the community's time on this by debating you any further (such as asking others to weigh in). That is, unless you WP:Edit war. I removed the text for now. "Problem" solved. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 23:28, 30 May 2017 (UTC)


 * That is fine I'm not wanting the links especially, I appreciate your restraint on the issue under discussion and have no intention to initiate any kind of editorial conflict viz Edit war. Thanks for the discussion. The best of things to be with you 22 and yours, in the future Plagktos (talk) 23:33, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

Blocked for sock puppetry
Dekimasu よ! 18:56, 6 March 2018 (UTC)