User talk:Plainsong

Matt Ouimet
I would just like to take the oppurtunity to say thanks for what you did to the above article, it really made a big difference to the quality. You have a good way with words!--Speedway 20:31, Apr 20, 2005 (UTC)

Anaheim, California
Thanks for adding to the Anaheim, California page. Are you a resident?

I made a few changes to the content you added. The Richard Nixon freeway was never built, except for a section in Marina Del Rey. Were you thinking of CA-90 (Imperial Highway)? Also, Euclid and Magnolia are both Streets, since they're north-south. I took out the links for Beach and Harbor, since no articles currently exist and the links would have to be disambiguated anyway (they're far from the only streets of those names in the world). &mdash;Morven 00:28, Mar 7, 2005 (UTC)

Syllabification
Don't worry about it. I notice you're relatively new to Wikipedia, so welcome. :-). It's been my experience that trying to be clever never quite works out the way it was intended on Wikipedia articles, and kind of detracts from the "serious" tone we try to set. Not that we have to be stilted or stodgy, but too light of a tone and we risk being not taken seriously. Anyway, keep up the good contributions and if you get caught up in any Wikipedia politics, don't let it scare you off. Cheers! P.S. it's easier to figure out who to respond to if you sign your comments using ~ . Nohat 07:08, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Literate
Yeah, I didn't think you were trying to be insulting. You're totally (heh, 'totally', akin here to 'like' elsewhere) right to be more specific than my generic 'some', but I couldn't think of a better way to put it off hand. Maybe there's a way to indicate proscriptivist tendencies of particular groups without stating their positive or negative qualities? -Seth Mahoney 01:53, Apr 2, 2005 (UTC)

southern vs. Southern
I'd appreciate it if you could elaborate on your explanation of "Southern" being "idiomatic." The Associated Press stylebook indicates the proper way to describe a region, assuming it is not discrete in a political or other sense, is to leave the first letter of the qualifer uncapitalized. So while southern California should be spelled with a lower-case "s," South Carolina should be spelled with a capital "s." Just because many people often make the mistake of throwing a capital "s" onto southern California does not mean we should disregard the proper way to portray the term. (unsigned -- Curps 05:51, 21 April 2005 (UTC))
 * MOS:CL governs Wikipedia's use of capital letters, not the Associated Press stylebook. Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style, regions that are proper nouns, including widely known expressions such as Southern California, start with a capital letter. -- Jreferee 16:12, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

California stub categories
I note you've created two new stub templates. Did you realise that stub types should normally be cleared by WikiProject Stub sorting before creation? That way they can be vetted to check that there are a viable number of stubs (at least 60-100) and that the category does not cross the existing stub hierarchy before the stub is created. In the case of the two California stubs it looks okay, but if you're planning to make any more categories, we'd like to know first! Also, there was a discussion at WP:WSS a couple of months ago where it was decided that individual US state stubs should only be created if there is a specific WikiProject for them - otherwise we'd suddenly get 50 new stub categories overnight, plus 50 more geo-stub categories! Is there such a project for California?

One more thing - the single most important thing a stub template must have is a category. Otherwise, you're just consigning the stubs marked into the void, probably never to be seen by the editors who should be seeing them. I have created stub categories for the templates to make sure they go somewhere they can be found... Oh, and if you're interested in helping sort stubs, we're always looking for new members of the project! Grutness|hello? 11:33, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Iraq article
There is an ongoing discussion and vote on the talk page (now, because of your move, at Talk:Iraq War of 2003), about how the article should be titled. Several editors are proposing alternatives, addressing the pros and cons of each, etc. If you think that the title 2003 Invasion of Iraq is inappropriate, you should participate in that process, rather than unilaterally moving the article yourself. I've asked the admins to undo the move, pending the results of the discussion and polling on the talk page. Because this is a subject on which many people have strong opinions, it would be better for you to express your opinions by commenting on the talk page. Any move should be deferred until the process is completed. JamesMLane 03:56, 2 May 2005 (UTC)

No problem. Good luck with your discussion.--Plainsong 03:59, 2 May 2005 (UTC)

Okay, I voted and I think I changed it back to how it was before. Thanks for the heads up.Plainsong 04:10, 2 May 2005 (UTC)


 * Here's another heads up: Don't do cut-and-paste moves! I know you were just trying to change it back to the way it was before, but I'm afraid you made the problem worse.  Now the article text is at one title and its history is at another title.  To make a simple, uncontroversial move, you should use the "Move this page" function.  If that won't work, see the discussion at Requested moves about how to proceed.  (An admin can do the move so that the history doesn't get fouled up.)  I'll see about getting someone to fix this.  It's a bit of bother for an admin but no disaster; still, please remember: Don't do cut-and-paste moves! JamesMLane 04:37, 2 May 2005 (UTC)

COTW Project
You voted for Culture of Ancient Rome, this week's Collaboration of the week. Please come and help it become a featured-standard article.

"The" OC
Good call with that. I am so sick and tired of hearing that!

Redirect fix
Hey, thanks for fixing that redirect I hastily made at Wikipedia:Rules. I didn't notice the mistake because I had transcluded the page!-) Wipe 18:46, 10 May 2005 (UTC)

L. Paul Bremer Article
Did you intend to mean Bremer had direct authority over coalition troops. One such press release seem to indicate differently. Reference: http://www.cpa-iraq.org/pressconferences/Pressconference23AugwithQAs.html

Ariele 21:31, 12 May 2005 (UTC)

Deletion policy/Area codes
This discussion seems to have run its course, so I have closed it and drawn conclusions. Could you please briefly look at the conclusions and note on the talk page if you agree? Thanks, Radiant_* 09:38, May 18, 2005 (UTC)

W. Mark Felt
Salve! I nominated W. Mark Felt as a WP:FAC. As you commented on the article's talk page, I'd appreciate your comments at Featured article candidates/W. Mark Felt/archive1. PedanticallySpeaking 14:57, Jun 17, 2005 (UTC)

Iraq War
Nice idea to move the article (Ive done it before myself). We and those of a similar mind should certainly see to it that others do not revert it to its previous dissected state. Claims of POV or NPOV seem to be moot on the issue, and without an arbitrating body to decide on the neutrality of the title, its rather an issue of making the change and sticking to it. A WP:RFC may be a good idea as well. -St|eve 08:45, 21 August 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for adding Doris Allen (politician)
Thank you for adding the Doris Allen (politician) stub. As you may have noticed, I am working on building out of a list of speakers of the California State Assembly. I have done a couple of small modifications to your stub, so thanks for giving me a place to start. Mike Dillon 01:37, August 22, 2005 (UTC)

RE:California
About the picture you added as an important city or town,coolceasar might tell you hes going to delete it. I did the same thing, with hollywood, he said its not concidered a city and other things. He might tell you that O.C is a county and its not important and blah blah blah, I think it would be O.K if you put Anaheim instead..:: Imdaking ::.  Tlk 01:32:07, 2005-09-08 (UTC)
 * Didn't I tell you, if you check california's article history, he added "OC is not a county", This guy thinks he's the only one that knows or lives in california..:: Imdaking ::.  Tlk 20:48:33, 2005-09-08 (UTC)

Viacom (1986)
I don't think it's wise to move the Viacom (1986) article I created to one that indicates the year 1971. The prior Viacom was not founded in 1971: it was founded in 1986. There was some sort of previous instance of the company that existed from 1971-1986, but I haven't yet researched the details of it or why it was refounded. Nonetheless, I expect that there may be a separate article in the future covering the 1971 instance. That's why I created it as "Viacom (1986)", and I used only the founding year in the title to follow the convention of Westinghouse Electric Corporation (1886) and Westinghouse Electric Corporation (1998), the latter company of which is still in existence, and both of which are highly intertwined with the CBS-Viacom transactions. Jkatzen 05:29, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

Edit summaries
It'd help your fellow editors understand what you're up to if you'd use the edit summaries. When I see a chunk of text deleted without comment I tend to assume it was a mistake or an unhelpful edit. Cheers, -Will Beback 07:00, 5 January 2006 (UTC)

North American area codes
Uncle G's major work 'bot is about to move another ... er ... small hill. But a consensus is required on the naming scheme to be employed. Please review Category:Greek Area Codes, Category:United Kingdom area codes, and Category:North American area codes, and then contribute to the discussion at Talk:North American Numbering Plan. Uncle G 21:11, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

Image:AfricanAmerican2.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:AfricanAmerican2.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — J3ff 22:59, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

Image:AfricanAmerican.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:AfricanAmerican.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — J3ff 22:59, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:CurtPringle.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:CurtPringle.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 11:04, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

Tom Daly
You have recently created the article Tom Daly. This was deleted in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policies. Please do not re-create the article: if you disagree with the article's deletion, you may ask for a review at Deletion review. Kimchi.sg 16:24, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

If you want to appeal the deletion, make a request on Deletion review, in the "Decisions to be reviewed" section. There's no need for me to undelete the text at this point - sysops can still see the text of the deleted article as if it were still around. Kimchi.sg 22:08, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Anaheimdland.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Anaheimdland.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. &mdash; Indon ( reply ) &mdash; 11:27, 14 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Then use appropriate license: &mdash; Indon ( reply ) &mdash; 08:42, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

Education of -> Education in
I'm OK with "Education in" as long as everyone else is. For my education, howja "move" a page so that all the history came with it?

FA nomination for California Gold Rush
The California Gold Rush article has been nominated for Featured article status. If you would like to comment on this nomination, please go here to leave your comment. To leave a comment on that page, click the [edit] link to the right of the title California Gold Rush.NorCalHistory 20:57, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

AfD Nomination: Culture of California 1800s to mid 1900s
An editor has nominated the article Culture of California 1800s to mid 1900s for deletion, under the Articles for deletion process. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the nomination (also see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Your opinions on why the topic of the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome: participate in the discussion by editing Articles for deletion/Culture of California 1800s to mid 1900s. Add four tildes like this &tilde;&tilde;&tilde;&tilde; to sign your comments. You can also edit the article Culture of California 1800s to mid 1900s during the discussion, but do not remove the "Articles for Deletion" template (the box at the top of the article), this will not end the deletion debate. Jayden54Bot 16:13, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Ronald Kline
I created an article on Bradley Willman, which may have content that could be added into the Ronald Kline article that you created. -- Jreferee 16:06, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

Fox Sullivan
A tag has been placed on John Fox Sullivan, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add  on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. R OGER  TALK 22:56, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Groat's syndrome
A template has been added to the article Groat's syndrome, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with db-author. Panoptical 22:16, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

Redirect of Orange Lutheran
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Orange Lutheran, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Orange Lutheran is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1). To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Orange Lutheran, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 09:10, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Alientraveller 17:24, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

Al Lutz
Another editor has added the " " template to the article Al Lutz, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the  template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 08:59, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Shamrock Holdings
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Shamrock Holdings, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Fails notability for WP:CORP, private holding company.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Drawn Some (talk) 02:30, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

Combining Talk Discussions Re Disney Film Lists
Dear SpikeJones,  Kasper2006,  Elikrotupos,  SWatsi,   Blitz Lutte,  NealP,  LtPowers,  SofaKing381222,  Collectionian,  Cartoon Boy,   Casey14,  Chris1219,  NuclearWarfare,  SkinnyPrude, and  Parker 1297:

Recently, it appears that you all have been interested in the various Disney discussions regarding the proper categorization of Disney animated films. There has been recent activity regarding the proper structure of the various Disney feature length film lists. Unfortunately the discussions regarding the lists / pages are taken place on a number of talk pages. Before we get further into a long discussion regarding the various structural issues with regards to List of Disney theatrical animated features, Template:Disney theatrical animated features, Walt Disney Animated Classics, Category:Disney animated features canon, List of Disney feature films‎ and what ever other lists are out there, I would suggest that we somehow combine the discussions (both past and present) into one place. This will allow easy review on single page for users interested in this matter. It will also allow future users an easy access to whatever rational is used to support the structure of the various lists (including keeping or merging certain lists.). I believe that in placing this discussion in one central location, it alleviates repetitive discussion, allows issues are not constantly revisited in different locations and hopefully sets the future standard in updating the various lists with the verifiable sources. I honestly do not know if there is Wikipedia policy on this, nor do I know what the proper way of creating such a place. But I do believe it would useful.

I have posted this suggestion on the all the User’s talk pages above and apologize if I have missed any person who may be interested in this matter. If you know of a user interested in this matter, please invite any that person to discuss these issues. .If I have included you and you have no interest in this matter, I sincerely apologize and please delete this message.

cc:

Flair Girls, creator of Template:Disney theatrical animated features

FuriousFreddy, creator of Category:Disney animated features canon

Plainsong, creator of List of Disney feature films‎

Sincerely yours, Jvsett (talk) 04:20, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mark Todd (policeman)


The article Mark Todd (policeman) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Per WP:BLP1E. Todd is known only for his participation in this event.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Favonian (talk) 18:36, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Mark Todd (policeman)
I have nominated Mark Todd (policeman), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Mark Todd (policeman). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Singularity42 (talk) 19:14, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Plainsong! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is an  Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 17:56, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Steuart Smith -

Fair use rationale for File:CurtPringle.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:CurtPringle.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk  03:37, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Pinewood Indians


The article Pinewood Indians has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Stub article that lacks notability and references.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Astros4477 ( talk ) 00:29, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Al Lutz for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Al Lutz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Al Lutz & until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Safiel (talk) 15:02, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

June 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=614934559 your edit] to Grand (Los Angeles Metro station) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:53, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
 * url=http://www.metro.net/around/rail/blue-line/|title=Blue Line station information}}  cite web|url=http://thesource.metro.net/2014/06/26/other-actions-taken-by-metro-board-of-directors-

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Jet Black Stare for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jet Black Stare is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Jet Black Stare until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dennis Brown - 2&cent; 23:25, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

Bren Law listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Bren Law. Since you had some involvement with the Bren Law redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 03:52, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Anaheimdland.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Anaheimdland.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is [ a list of your uploads].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.

ATTENTION : This is an automated, BOT-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate your file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 03:00, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Boris Morros, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page MGB ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Boris_Morros check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Boris_Morros?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:20, 11 April 2020 (UTC)