User talk:Plaintalk2010

Conflict of interest on Plain Talk
If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. sixty nine  • spill it •  09:17, 10 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Please leave the cleanup tags at the top of Plain Talk Volume 1-Everything you ever and never wanted to know about Racism and Stereotypes and let other editors remove them once they're addressed. This is especially true of the COI tag, since you have the conflict of interest, and it's impossible for you to judge when that's been cleaned up sufficiently. —C.Fred (talk) 05:19, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

All-American Basketball Alliance (2010)

 * Nuvola apps important.svg You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on All-American Basketball Alliance (2010). Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Stonemason89 (talk) 02:31, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px]] Please stop. If you continue to add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to All-American Basketball Alliance (2010), you will be blocked from editing. Stonemason89 (talk) 02:31, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Plain Talk Volume 1-Everything you ever and never wanted to know about Racism and Stereotypes
An article that you have been involved in editing, Plain Talk Volume 1-Everything you ever and never wanted to know about Racism and Stereotypes, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/. Thank you.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. —C.Fred (talk) 16:44, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Sockpuppet investigations/Plaintalk2010 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Stonemason89 (talk) 19:09, 31 January 2010 (UTC)


 * To explain this a little further: a user has alleged that you are using more than one account in an inappropriate fashion. As a general rule, each user should have only one account. It is inappropriate to use multiple accounts in certain deceptive ways, or to avoid a block or possible block on your account. While it appears that you may have used multiple accounts, I don't see where it was done inappropriately.
 * If you have used multiple accounts in the past, it's easy enough to remedy the situation now: pick a single account and use that account exclusively from this point forward. As long as you do that, there's no problem with you editing going forward. (By contrast, using multiple accounts improperly, especially after being informed of this rule, could result in all of the involved accounts being blocked.)
 * If you have any questions, feel free to ask here. I am watching your talk page and will see the question posted. —C.Fred (talk) 15:29, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Plain Talk-Vol.1 on Racism and stereotypes


The article Plain Talk-Vol.1 on Racism and stereotypes has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * non-notable book, tried many variations of the title and could find no information it in reliable sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ridernyc (talk) 05:04, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Plain Talk-Vol.1 on Racism and stereotypes
A tag has been placed on Plain Talk-Vol.1 on Racism and stereotypes, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. —C.Fred (talk) 05:08, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

February 2010
This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you create an inappropriate page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Ridernyc (talk) 05:09, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of All-American Basketball Alliance (2010)
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is All-American Basketball Alliance (2010). We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/All-American Basketball Alliance (2010). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:18, 1 April 2010 (UTC)