User talk:Plankton5165/Archive 1

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Images (1).jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Images (1).jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Gage (talk) 04:49, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Kirstie Alley DWTS.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Kirstie Alley DWTS.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is [ a list of your uploads]. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 01:57, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Bruno2009.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Bruno2009.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 17:05, 2 October 2011 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Kirstie Alley DWTS.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Kirstie Alley DWTS.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Musamies (talk) 16:07, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Kirstie Alley DWTS.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Kirstie Alley DWTS.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Musamies (talk) 05:48, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Bruno2009.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Bruno2009.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Musamies (talk) 11:16, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

October 2011
Your addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Camw (talk) 11:33, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

November 2011
Please do not attack other editors, as you did on User talk:Sottolacqua. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. '  Sottolacqua ''' (talk) 02:28, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to Dancing with the Stars (U.S. season 12). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. '  Sottolacqua ''' (talk) 02:31, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Dancing with the Stars (U.S. season 13) shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block.

If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly.  Sottolacqua  (talk) 22:43, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

RFA
Hi, I wanted to let you know I reverted your edits to WP:RFA. There is a very particular method of nominating yourself for admin, detailed at Requests for adminship/Nominate. But before you go back and nominate yourself, let my warn you that based on your edit count it seems extremely unlikely that your RFA will succeed. Generally RFA candidates have at least 5000 edits, though there is no set edit requirement. I hope you will keep editing, and consider RFA again when you have more experience. In the meantime, you should follow some RFA nominations to get a sense for what the community expects in a successful candidate. Monty 845  00:42, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Sockpuppet investigations/Plankton5165 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page.  Sottolacqua  (talk) 20:12, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

December 2011
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Dancing with the Stars (U.S. season 12), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ''Stop edit warring on this and related Dancing with the Stars articles. This is your final warning.''  Sottolacqua  (talk) 03:09, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

That's it, I quit. It's the DWTS wiki is my own. --Plankton5165 (talk) 01:31, 13 December 2011 (UTC)