User talk:Plasmanine

Shave
I see you've deleted my earlier comments on your talk page about your WP:COI linkspamming to promote Shave. I have reverted your most recent edit since there is nothing I can find at your website to indicate that Shave is a print publication as well as an online magazine. Please do not add uncited claims. If Shave has a print component, a reliable-source citation for this should exist. --Tenebrae (talk) 23:58, 27 November 2011 (UTC)


 * We need a secondary source. Aside from that one implication on the website, nothing says specifically where it's published, where it's distributed, how often it's published or anything else. Even that page says simply that the magazine is "updated" regularly &mdash; "updated" being a Web term, not a print term. Again, if it's a print magazine, then surely there is some published reference to this somewhere. --Tenebrae (talk) 17:18, 28 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Here is a source that says it's an online magazine: http://www.tsbmag.com/2010/04/22/blog-of-the-week-shave-magazine/. I know very well what linkspamming is, and going around Wikipedia adding links to one source and one source only, as you have done, is linkspamming. I would ask, in turn, that you read about secondary sourcing.


 * Rather than butt heads, I suggest we ask for a third-party mediator if you can't find proper sourcing. Would you agree to that, or would you rather edit-war? --Tenebrae (talk) 17:24, 28 November 2011 (UTC)


 * That would be okay. I will leave it as is for now until I find proper sourcing, then I will submit it to you and you can make a judgment call --Plasmanine (talk) 17:28, 28 November 2011 (UTC)