User talk:Platflyer

Nomination of Claire Cliteur for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Claire Cliteur is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Claire Cliteur until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 16:17, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Alex Salcedo for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alex Salcedo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Alex Salcedo until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ... disco spinster   talk  00:16, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Claire Cliteur


A tag has been placed on Claire Cliteur, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Melcous (talk) 09:10, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Claire Cliteur


A tag has been placed on Claire Cliteur, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. &mdash; Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 09:20, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

July 2018
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Claire Cliteur, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. &mdash; Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 09:22, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
 * I have refunded the aforementioned page to Draft:Claire Cliteur. You can work on it there until the matters leading to its deletion have been resolved, and request that it be returned to mainspace when it meets Wikipedia's standards for inclusion. bd2412  T 11:32, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

December 2019
Your recent editing history at Matthijs Otterloo shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. stwalkerster (talk) 15:06, 18 December 2019 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, you may be blocked from editing. Praxidicae (talk) 21:18, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 21:20, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

COI
Hi - you have repeatedly attempted to create an article about Matthijs Otterloo, despite the fact that the article about him was deleted as a result of a discussino at WP:AfD. I also note that you have written an article about a company associated with him, and have done very little else here. Please can I draw your attention to our COI guidelines, and the paid editing policy, which may apply to you? I have salted the article title Matthijs Otterloo, to prevent further attempts at recreation; should you wish to try again, please make any connection you have with the subject clear, and ensure that there are sufficient new sources that meet the requirements of WP:GNG before attempting to proceed with any new article in draft space. Best Girth Summit  (blether)  15:15, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Claire Cliteur
Hello, Platflyer. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Claire Cliteur, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 22:01, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Claire Cliteur


Hello, Platflyer. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Claire Cliteur".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CommanderWaterford (talk) 20:23, 16 February 2021 (UTC)