User talk:Platonides

If you leave me a note here, please tell me at my discussion page at es: because if not it may be long before i notice it here.

Thanks.

Re: Template:Infobox animanga/Header
Which page? All of them that used the infobox were affected, which means hundreds if not thousands of articles that were messed up due to your template tinkering. Since it's a template, any changes to it will show up in any article that includes it.--  十  八  20:55, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Okay, Kanon was one article I saw affected.--  十  八  21:49, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

Chennai Map
You dont understand, the organisation im working with doesnt want the source map to be available on the net. i dont get it, as the author, dont i have a right to pull the map off wikipedia? the map is no longer under a free license, i can no longer permit derivative works of it --Plane Mad 17:11, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

File:Digital UK.svg
Hi, out of curiosity, what was the issue? &mdash; neuro  (talk)  20:02, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Ah, right. Thanks. :) &mdash; neuro  (talk)  20:24, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

Rotten.com
...is not a reliable source for anything.

Also the nomorelinks template in the shock site examples section notes that shock sites without reliable third-party sources will be removed on sight. It was never put into discussion. --Aeon17x (talk) 01:27, 28 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Discuss it on the talk page. The Tubgirl entry does not pass the requirement for reliable sources, and reverting to a previous version with a rotten.com reference simply doesn't satisfy that (as been done before). If you can rewrite a better entry with reliable sources, bring it up there and we'll consider it. --Aeon17x (talk) 22:30, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

Thank you
Thank you for helping me on WP:VPT, I really appreciate it. Ikip (talk) 21:35, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

Link behavior
On http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Scripts/Wikilinks there is a link to the page wikilinks2.js - the link text is wikilinks.js. I wonder if it's possible to configure the link so that when clicked on you get the wiki page but when right-click and save-as, you are offered the script itself for download. kcylsnavS 03:05, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank you for getting back to me. But it wasn't a page I wanted to save - the link appeared to be a link to download a file when in fact it is a link to a page. Maybe I will simply modify the link description - that will take care of the problem of assuming the link is something it isn't. kcylsnavS 00:03, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Hey, that's great - thanks for revising the link and showing us all how to make that behavior work. kcylsnavS 01:05, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Documentation for gadget authors
I saw you had done some work on heavily-used gadgets. We're trying to start a library for gadget authors to use. Please check it out and post any questions or comments there — ☠ MarkAHershberger ☢ (talk) ☣ 18:44, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Re: Regarding your edit summaries
Thanks mate but I AM being civil and am not “attacking” anyone or anything but an organization that I profoundly believe to be pure evil and of Satan himself. Just look at all of the damage it has done to your country – let alone the other so-called “member states” for God’s sake!!!

Also, with regards to “offending anyone”, to coin a phrase from that old classic film Gone with the Wind “Quite frankly my dear, I don’t give a damn”! I know what I believe, I know what I believe is right and I’m damned proud of it because, obviously unlike yourself and many others especially on this leftist-globalist infested website, I have actually done a hell of a lot of research on this despicable organisation and the pure filth who are behind it and who created it in the first place in order to exterminate we the indigenous European people FOREVER via their diabolical Coudenhove-Kalergi Plan!!!

Maybe you and everyone else on here need to do some research into that because you’ve probably never even heard of it!

“Kind regards”

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Mike22r (talk • contribs) 00:36, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)