User talk:Playsfair234

speculation
In your comment on The Amazing Race 15, where you reintroduced completely unverified and utterly trivial material, you asked where "speculation" came from--but really, the question is, how do you verify a statement that begins like this, "They grew even more disappointed..." The article already lacks reliable sources, and the psychological insight necessary to make such a claim requires a lot more than some TV watching. Is it your wish to turn Wikipedia into TV Guide or some fansite? It seems there's a couple of editors who have no higher aspirations, and who agree that gossip and chit-chat have encyclopedic value. That's a pity; I wish you all would read WP:V and WP:RS. Drmies (talk) 00:43, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. --SineBot (talk) 02:33, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC)