User talk:Pleasanthill

Vibrational_Medicine
Hi there. I noticed you recently wrote the above article. With regard to sourcing, please note that in order to ensure verifiability, Wikipedia requires that facts be sourced by  multiple independent reliable sources. In this case, I'm not sure that the Q-Institute would qualify as a reliable source. It might be more appropriate to cite peer-reviewed medical journals, or published influential texts that discuss the subject. Best, -- B figura (talk) 05:53, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
 * PS, I should also mention that you should take a look at WP:FRINGE. As the article admits, Vibrational medicine is not really mainstream. I'm certainly not trying to say that non-mainstream topics can't have articles on Wikipedia, but you should be aware that topics which might be considered 'fringe science' have some constraints. (Which are mainly there to prevent wikipedia from being used as a soapbox.) I just wanted to tell you now, so you didn't find out later when someone's banging down the door trying to delete the article. Best, -- B figura  (talk) 06:37, 30 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Hmm, our messages must have crossed in wiki-space. But regarding your comment on my talk, I saw the quotation, which is good. However, as I kinda say above, I think you might want as many references as you can conveniently put your hands on. If you'd like some help, the people over at WikiProject_Paranormal might be interested, as they generally get into non-mainstream medical science. (Note, I'm not trying to be pejorative at all, I just think that's the most appropriate wikiproject to go to for help). Cheers, -- B figura (talk) 06:44, 30 September 2007 (UTC)