User talk:Pleasantview

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. JoeSmack Talk 08:20, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from creating inappropriate pages. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. JoeSmack Talk 08:20, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Deleted page "Farnsworthfan"
A page you created, or image you uploaded, Farnsworthfan, has been [ deleted] in accordance with our deletion policy. In particular, it meets the one or more criteria for speedy deletion; the relevant criterion is:


 * Unremarkable people, groups, companies and web content. An article about a real person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content that does not assert the importance or significance of its subject.

Wikipedia has certain standards for inclusion that all articles must meet. Certain types of article must establish the notability of their subject by asserting its importance or significance. Additionally, since Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, content inappropriate for an encyclopedia, or content that would be more suited to somewhere else (such as a directory or social networking website) is not acceptable. See What Wikipedia is not for the relevant policy.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable notability guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content; it will be deleted again and may be protected from re-creation. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article. If you have any questions, please contact an administrator for assistance. Thank you – Gurch 09:50, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/William Sledd (2nd nomination)
You have expressed an interest in deleting this article, so as a courtesy I am notifying you of its AFD discussion. --N Shar 18:16, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

William Sledd
OK, it is time We Tubers had our own wiki. I am starting a wiki just on YouTube guys with more than 100 subscribers. I need ten good sysops. I've seen your contributions and that you realise there is a problem here on WP with too many mems being added in. We need to broaden the idea of wikis. I would like to appoint you as one. Please let me know by emailing me. frummer 08:31, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia once again, you will be blocked from editing. Mhking 01:39, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Sclub82.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Sclub82.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. feydey 10:54, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

AJ Melendez
I have added a "" template to the article AJ Melendez, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Hatch68 15:28, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Redirection of Jamiroquai to Jason Kay
Please read and discuss any page moves on the Jamiroquai talk page before redirecting the page. The consensus ont he talk page is that Jamiroquai is a band, not just the lead singer. If you disagree, please discuss on the talk page. &mdash; O cat ecir  Talk  08:37, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

'''Haha you said Kason Kay. Learn to spell.'''

Your continued redirects against consensus
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. &mdash; O cat ecir  Talk  08:48, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

You freaking robot you didn't help me at all. I have tried all of the above. I'm not that stubborn to do as I please on a website like this. I think the redirect is not vandalism. It saves a whole article which is unnecessary. (Pleasantview 00:17, 8 May 2007 (UTC))


 * If you do not stop repeatedly redirecting the article Jamiroquai without consensus you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Canderra 01:04, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

'''Fine maybe I wanna be freaking banned nobody is discussing this and you are really helping thanks. Freaking robot.''' (Pleasantview 01:08, 8 May 2007 (UTC))

Image:Jaykay2.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Jaykay2.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add , without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Chowbok  ☠  16:36, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Big Brother 2007 (UK)
Where are you getting all these names from? You have provided no source, except for "the source is within," whatever that is supposed to mean. This just looks like vandalism at the moment. --LorianTC 10:02, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Lets just say I know more about this than you do.

There will be 15 housemates entering on the May 25, 2007 (Pleasantview 10:05, 14 May 2007 (UTC))
 * Please refer to WP:NOR. Facts in articles must be verifiable. --LorianTC 10:07, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Official 15 housemates. Fine delete it. But save it in notepad and be sure to watch the premiere on the 25 and see the exact same names.(Pleasantview 10:10, 14 May 2007 (UTC))


 * Until you have a reliable and verified source from this information then please do not add it on to the article, when/if you get a reliable and verified source please post it on the articles talk page to be checked, if you add the names on one more time a ban request will be made. Andytalk 10:37, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

List of Big Brother 2007 housemates (UK)
This is your final warning, if you continue to create and recreate unsourced articles and use unsourced information in articles, you will be blocked from editing. Andytalk 10:51, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:BB12.jpg
Hello, Pleasantview. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:BB12.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Pleasantview. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg, so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or    media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 05:45, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

Big Brother 2007 (UK)
Please stop. Continuing to add unsourced or original content is considered vandalism and may result in a block. LorianTC 08:26, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

For the last time. BB8 has NOT yet been given an offical start date. It being on the June 1 TV Guide on the Channel 4 Website does not confirm it as the launch night!!!

Image:Jamiroquai6.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Jamiroquai6.JPG. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add , without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShadowHalo 00:53, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Jameriq.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Jameriq.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 07:07, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

JKayAward.jpg
I have tagged Image:JKayAward.jpg as replaceable fair use. If you wish to dispute this assertion, please add to the image description page and a comment explaining your reasoning to the the image talk page. Calliopejen1 09:55, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:JKayAward.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:JKayAward.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 06:31, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

Jamiroquai redirect to Jay Kay
I reverted the redirect of the Jamiroquai article to the Jay Kay article. The Jay Kay article is a biographical article. FlowerpotmaN &middot;( t ) 03:08, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

Look, the consensus on the Talk:Jamiroquai page is to keep the two articles separate, which is also the practice on Wikipedia. The band performs as Jamiroquai, while the Jay Kay article is about the person. If you really think the band article should be a redirect to the Jay Kay article, bring it up (again) on  the talk page for the article.  FlowerpotmaN &middot;( t ) 03:25, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Jamlogo.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Jamlogo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 01:04, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Americanjuniors2.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Americanjuniors2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 19:20, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Americanjuniors3.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Americanjuniors3.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 19:22, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Big Brother Canada
A tag has been placed on Big Brother Canada, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you.  ♪♫Al ucard   16♫♪  02:06, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Big Brother Canada
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages such as Big Brother Canada, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you.  ♪♫Al ucard   16♫♪  02:07, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

April 2008
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. ''Please don't add back "Big Brother Canada" there is no official licensed English language version of Big Brother by Endemol. There is only a French language version. All edits pertaining to an English Canadian Big Brother not approved by Endemol is considered vandalism.''  ♪♫Al ucard   16♫♪  02:09, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Please do not create hoaxes. Cease and desist from introducing misinformation into Wikipedia if you are attempting to test our ability to detect and remove it. This has been done before, with universally negative results. Hoaxes are marked for deletion shortly after they are created. Kindly — do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method is to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia, and then to check to see how long they have been in place and, if possible, correct them. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia policy to learn more about this project and how you can make a positive impact. Thanks, Rjd0060 (talk) 03:04, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Addicted (Jamiroquai album)
A tag has been placed on requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, place the template hangon underneath the other template on the article and put a note on the page's discussion page saying why this article should stay. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please use deletion review instead of continuing to recreate the page. Thank you. Mdsummermsw (talk) 12:50, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Sclub82.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Sclub82.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Mdsummermsw (talk) 13:09, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Spice Girls
Dabomb87 (talk) 01:23, 8 August 2009 (UTC)

Reubens edit conflict
Pleasantview, did you see my comments on the talk page? What interview(s) are you referring to?--The lorax (talk) 09:20, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of E-music television


The article E-music television has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern: E-music television – news, books, scholar Consequently, this article is about a subject that appears to lack sufficient notability.'''
 * '''A search for references failed to find significant coverage in reliable sources to comply with notability requirements. This included web searches for news coverage, books, and journals, which can be seen from the following links:

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Blast Ulna (talk) 04:49, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:Pleasantview
User:Pleasantview, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Pleasantview and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of User:Pleasantview during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 21:22, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

Artel Jarod Walker
Please don't re add that picture at that article it is a HOAX. See the thread at the BLPN. Off2riorob (talk) 07:25, 19 December 2010 (UTC)