User talk:PleaseGiveMeAnA/sandbox

Daniel Nunez Peer Review
Neutrality: There seems to be a neutral tone throughout the article.

Sources: In terms of sources, you have a good amount that helps exemplify your argument. These sources appear to be scholarly and it's good that you provided the links to these sources.

Structure: You have an incredible structure that is clearly labeled. Maybe you could make a new section that underlines the issues with your topic. Maybe providing a history to micrcobeads will help understand the changes that it has undergone.

Balance: It terms of balance, every section is overall the same. One section is not overpowering the other. Maybe try adding a lead paragrpah that underlines the issue in general.

Reliability: Because of the professional sources that you have included in this article, it seems to be very well trusted. You have a good amount of sources in your article.

Danielnunez 9386 (talk) 20:26, 27 March 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for your feedback! I felt that I was being a bit too biased in my discussion however, I am glad that it feels balanced and I was not being partial to any one side. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PleaseGiveMeAnA (talk • contribs) 23:28, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

Peer Review: Hunter Peoples
Hi Ming- I find your topic very interesting and I like where you are trying to go. I believe that this is a great topic to have because it is a big problem in the world today as more of us use cosmetic products. I think the information on microbeads harming the environment is well stated and well sourced. You seem to have a few different, reliable citations. However, four of your citations are from the same author. I see that is they are different articles, but perhaps try finding different authors in order to get different viewpoints.

I do see quotes in the “Microbeads” section that do not have a link to a reference by the end of the quote. You should find where that quote can from and match the reference to where it is listed in your citation. Also, in the second section you explain how regulations issued by the Food and Drug Administration and the European Union set standards for the International Organization for Standardization. If you could expand a little more on what some of those regulations are and if you can, tie them to your topic. Overall, I like where you are going. Continue to fill content gaps that exist I feel like this topic could be explored more and there are a lot of fascinating things you can find. I think it’s going to be a great article in the end.

Hpeoples98 (talk) 20:30, 27 March 2019 (UTC)

Hey Hunter,

Thank you fro the feedback. I was trying my best to find more from a reliable source however it was a bit difficult. I had found one more and thought that it would suffice as my final source. I often forget to place the source ith my quotes so thank you for pointing this out and reminding me.