User talk:PlewReficuL

Welcome!
Welcome!

Hello, PlewReficuL, and welcome to Wikipedia! I have noticed that you are fairly new! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. I also see that some of your recent edits show an interest in the use of images and/or photos on Wikipedia.

Did you know that ...
 * ...Wikipedia has a very stringent image use policy?
 * ...most images from Flickr, online news websites, and other web sources are copyrighted?
 * ...Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously?
 * ...freely-licensed images should be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, a central location for images where they can be used on all Wikipedia projects?
 * ...we recommend that new users use our "files for upload" process - at least until you get the hang of things?

If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type  on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Joshua Jonathan  Joshua Jonathan   -  Let's talk!   16:03, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * Manual of Style
 * Okay, thanks for the advice, tips and welcome!PlewReficuL (talk) 00:54, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

PlewReficuL, you are invited to the Teahouse!

 * Okay, thanks for the Welcome!

Diana and Endymion
Nice picture indeed, but why adding it at so many articles? Joshua Jonathan  -  Let's talk!   16:04, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
 * I just think the picture fits with all those articles, sir.PlewReficuL (talk) 00:51, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Some self-restraint would be welcome. I also have some favorite pictures and paintings (see my userpage), but I don't deem them fit to be used at too many pages at such a prominent place. Too bad for the wider audience, of course, but alas, at least one can shine a little corner of the world at their own userpage. Where, of course, one can choose the size one deems appropriate. All the best,  Joshua Jonathan   -  Let's talk!   04:31, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Polytheism edits
I removed the edits you recently made to the Polytheism article as they were not sourced. Feel free to add back into the article, though please use verifiable sources to support the claims you make. FULBERT (talk) 10:08, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
 * I removed the recent entry to the Polytheism article as it did not have a complete citation. Please see specs on Referencing for beginners for the hows and specs on what should be included. BTW, I see you appear to be a new user, so Welcome to Wikipedia. It takes a bit to get used to it, so my comments are intended to help. FULBERT (talk) 12:02, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Ok112.211.211.1 (talk) 13:04, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Sorry, forgot to log in.PlewReficuL (talk) 13:11, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Logging in is something to get used to! Glad you went back in and added it as a response! The references you added are almost complete, but before I undo again as incomplete, please see the Information to include in references. In the references you cited, it is still not clear if those are books (which would benefit from an ISBN or link to a publisher page) or articles (which would then benefit from volume / issue / pages / doi). Can you go back in and edit that information? Thanks for your contributions! FULBERT (talk) 13:18, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Can you provide an ISBN or link to the first text? I was not able to locate it. Is this the book you mentioned in your second reference (as the link does not seem to be working)? FULBERT (talk) 15:23, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

Blocked
A disproportionate amount of your edits appear to involve either introducing paintings containing penises to an article, or adding an undue reference to anal sex to an article lede. It appears that you are here to disrupt rather than contribute. I have instituted a brief block, but if this behavior persists, a longer block will be necessary. bd2412 T 13:16, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
 * I would like to ask: by what policy are you doing this? Also, I it's not like I have provided arguments for the edit in the talk page. I also find it intruiging that you only decided to peek into my contributions after the discussion has gone stale and I had to bring the edits back. Not necessarily accusing you of bias, just stating things from what they only seem as from my point of view.PlewReficuL (talk) 03:13, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
 * WP:NOTHERE. You should not be at all surprised that your continued misconduct resulted in a deeper look into your previous participation. There is some familiarity to your pattern of edits. Have you previously edited under a different name? bd2412  T 14:52, 25 December 2017 (UTC)