User talk:PlexiGH

Your submission at Articles for creation: NHL 19 (August 8)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SportingFlyer was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:NHL 19 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:NHL 19, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:NHL_19 Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:SportingFlyer&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:NHL_19 reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SportingFlyer  talk  13:04, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

Twosday moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Twosday, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. – Pbrks (t • c) 01:50, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
 * I kind of took over this draft. What do you think about it? Total no-no or just no? Happy Twosday! twsabin 19:23, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
 * I'm not convinced that is passes WP:NEVENTS (or if that even applies to a single date), so I think I'll leave it to another editor to review the submission. – Pbrks (t • c) 00:24, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the reply. I don't want to nag: One last look after expansion? Basically the subject is formulated as a notable fad, that would go in . Standard is GNG not NEVENT. (Fads are defined by their transience, but they can still be notable, as examples demonstrate) twsabin 19:23, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of List of songs in the NHL video game soundtracks for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of songs in the NHL video game soundtracks is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of songs in the NHL video game soundtracks until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. OceanHok (talk) 13:45, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of NHL 24 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article NHL 24 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/NHL 24 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Paul Vaurie (talk) 19:24, 14 August 2023 (UTC)