User talk:Plindenbaum

About copyrights / biographies and pubmed, I'm aware of a problem before February 2009 (Believe me, I'm deeply sorry). Please see those links:
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Somno/Archive_6#About_Clarence_Crafoord_and_pubmed
 * http://friendfeed.com/e/4950d465-2b8c-4570-b2aa-85c5317c8952/Does-an-article-in-pubmed-belong-to-the-legal/
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard#Massive_copyright_violations_and_plagiarism]
 * http://www.cotch.net/blog/20090126_1005

January 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Oda Mari (talk) 14:47, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Hi! I saw your message. First of all, please accept my apology. I'm really sorry that I took your edit as vandalism. Kitasato's birth year is 1853. See these pages,    They all say it's 1853. (Even if you don't read Japanese, you can find the date) I didn't see the category when I reverted your edit. But it's obvious that the category is a mistake, you see. Now I'm going to fix it. Again so sorry my mistake. Best regards. Oda Mari (talk) 05:12, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

John Strachey (geologist)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of John Strachey (geologist), and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.britannica.com/eb/article-9069866/John-Strachey. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 18:43, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
 * OK, changed --Plindenbaum (talk) 19:49, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Flags
Hi Plindenbaum. You eddited a lot of biographies lately and in some you added the flag. There was a consensus sometime ago, that a flag should only be used if it is necesarry like for military personel. We had some stupid nationalist extremist starting editwars about scientists like Copernicus or Prelog and the flag was sometimes a condensation point for stupid people. If it is OK for you, it would be good to leave the flag out of the biograpy table if possible?--Stone (talk) 18:38, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
 * No problem! It would be no problem with 99% of all biographies, but the 1% kills all th fun! Thanks for your work! Nice to have everything updated!--Stone (talk) 05:08, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

URLs to PubMed
On James Herrick (and probably elsewhere) you linked to abstracts on Pubmed by placing the URL in the citation. This is usually unnecessary. Simply replacing citation with cite journal, and using the "pmid=" parameter in the latter template, will automatically generate a link to Pubmed. Even quicker, David Iberri's template filler will automatically generate a cite journal template on entering the PMID! JFW | T@lk  16:33, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Ok, changed --Plindenbaum (talk) 19:27, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

Image:Replace this image male.svg
Hello. Please do not add this images to articles that are not living people. There has been consensus that for non-WP:BLPs, this image really adds nothing and is an eyesore at best. By all means continue to do what you are doing otherwise. Thanks, Wizardman  02:34, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
 * But using this image could used to get an anwser to the following question "What are the articles about scientists who are missing a picture ?". Isn't it ?--Plindenbaum (talk) 10:10, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm not actually sure what you meant by that reply.. the way Isee it, it asks "do you own a pic of this person", which clearly no one is reasonably going to have a pic lying around that they took. Wizardman  03:16, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
 * ... for example, using "Image:Replace this image female.svg" with "Template:Infobox_Scientist" can be used as a metadata about the gender to quickly find the  women scientist  who are missing a picture (e.g. Lilian_Gibbs Christine_L._Borgman Philippa_Marrack Jacqueline_Barton Ruth_Aylett Ruth_Patrick Byllye_Avery Ayanna_M._Howard Elizabeth_Blackburn Margaret_T._Fuller Cornelia_Clapp Esther_Orozco Linda_H._Aiken Helen_B._Taussig Catherine_Dulac Row_Lewis Suzy_Covey Candace_Pert Audrey_Richards Theo_Colborn Daphne_Koller Karen_Ramey_Burns Julie_A._Leary Francine_Neago Mary_Leakey Stephanie_Kwolek Charlotte_Auerbach Mary_Watson_Whitney Ada_Yonath Tanya_Byron Andrea_Ghez Ruth_Sager Marcia_J._Bates Florence_Nightingale_David Ida_Henrietta_Hyde Lee_Ann_Newsom Marie_Maynard_Daly Rosalyn_Sussman_Yalow Elizabeth_F._Neufeld Mary_Higby_Schweitzer Rebecca_Grinter Amanda_Chessell Shafi_Goldwasser Main_Page Manuela_M._Veloso Williamina_Fleming Mary-Claire_King Ann_Fienup-Riordan Ynes_Mexia Shere_Hite Amy_S._Bruckman Elisabeth_Noelle-Neumann Chien-Shiung_Wu Sara_Seager Shelley_Batts Samantha_PowerMaria_Reiche Lorna_Goldberg Cecilia_Payne-Gaposchkin Katherine_Esau Carol_W._Greider Deborah_Charlesworth Sandra_Postel Catharine_MacKinnon Susan_J._Kelley Marthe_Vogt Harriet_Brooks Cornelia_Bargmann Deborah_Estrin Hattie_Alexander Kathleen_Kenyon ...). --Plindenbaum (talk) 19:30, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Clinical cardiology
(edited/fixed)

Robert Metzenberg (geneticist) bio
Hi Plindenbaum. I haven't been active on Wikipedia for many months. Today (July 15th, 2008) is the first anniversary of my father's passing (Robert Metzenberg). I happened to search for his memorial page, written by some of his scientific colleagues, and I came upon the wikipedia page you started a few weeks ago. I was very touched that you had started a biography page. It wouldn't be appropriate for me to be involved in writing, but I am happy to answer questions about him and his research, although my brother would a better source. Obviously, I am just too close to the subject. If you see a picture you like on his memorial page, I could scan one for the public domain. Eric Selker's article in Genetics was wonderful. My father never had much interest in being famous. I'll say a few more words in the Talk section there. Metzenberg (talk) 03:15, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

See reply
Your person box question MessinaRagazza (talk) 21:08, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

Charles Darwin
Check out Charles Darwin.....I've implemented my suggestion. Do u like?MessinaRagazza (talk) 13:56, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

Clarence Crafoord
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Clarence Crafoord, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://lib.bioinfo.pl/auth:Kvitting,JPE. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 19:40, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Copyright problem: Clarence Crafoord
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Clarence Crafoord, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://lib.bioinfo.pl/auth:Kvitting,JPE, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL), versions 1.3 or later then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Clarence Crafoord and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Clarence Crafoord with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Clarence Crafoord.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at [ this temporary page]. Leave a note at Talk:Clarence Crafoord saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Somno (talk) 02:53, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Clarence Crafoord/Temp
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Clarence Crafoord/Temp, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, Clarence Crafoord/Temp appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Clarence Crafoord/Temp has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Clarence Crafoord/Temp and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Clarence Crafoord/Temp with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Clarence Crafoord/Temp.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. Userafw (talk) 08:40, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Why ? Can you explain please, I don't see the interest. --Plindenbaum (talk) 08:46, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Hi Plindenbaum. The temp copy was deleted because it too was a copyright infringement. As discussed on the article talk page, Wikipedia's aim is to provide free content, and text copied from another source (except public domain and licences compatible with GFDL) is not free content. Somno (talk) 09:55, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

Edward Long Fox
Thanks for starting the article on Edward Long Fox. I have added to it, and the Talk page and hope to provide more details and information, such as his trip to France to repay the profits his father had made from an unwilling investment in a privateer ship. Vernon White '''. . . Talk''' 09:58, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

Copyright violations and plagiarism
Your editorial contributions are being discussed at Administrators'_noticeboard. Erik9 (talk) 15:31, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Bronisław Hager
A tag has been placed on Bronisław Hager requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Laurent (talk) 18:54, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

Protein interactions
I am not positive, but I think Yeast2Hybrid is a bot account you set up. I think the work you and/or the bot is doing is great, but I have one small request which I have added to the talk page here. I am notifying you here just in case you miss the message on the Yeast2Hybrid talk page. Cheers. Boghog2 (talk) 09:47, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

Yeast2Hybrid
Hi... this bot you set up is much less than perfect. For example, on the LNGFR (p75) page, first the interactions were duplicated, and second the entire point of the LNGFR is to bind the various neurotrophic factors (NGF, BDNF, NT-3, NT-4), and yet you on:hly list NGF and none of the other neurotrophins as binding the LNGFR... which is quite confusing to non-experts. Also in other cases the interactions are incomplete, to say the least. Gacggt (talk) 02:23, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your comment. Hoooopps, sorry for this bug. I've updated the references by searching the content after ==Interaction==, but meanwhile, the header has been changed from ==Interaction== to  ==_Interaction_== . I used the 'biogrid' to find the interactions http://www.thebiogrid.org/SearchResults/summary/110870 but I only used the interactions having two or more references to avoid the false positives. --Plindenbaum (talk) 07:54, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

Domenico Cotugno
Can you help figure out what statements in the article are supported by which of the "references" that you added back in '07? Dicklyon (talk) 23:21, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

Correction of serious misinformation in James Braid article
Hi, I have requested that the title for the article on James Braid be changed from the inappropriate, misleading, and historically incorrect current title of James Braid (physician) to the appropriate and historically correct title of James Braid (surgeon).

On the basis that you have contributed to the current article in some way, I thought that you should know that the article will be moving within 7 days from James Braid (physician) to the appropriate and correct title of James Braid (surgeon) unless there is widespread, informed, and fact-based objections.

It would be helpful if you could express your support for the correction of what seems to have been, originally, an inadvertent error, at site of the discussion of proposal. Thanks, in anticipation. . . Lindsay658 (talk) 09:36, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Plindenbaum! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:34, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Jean Weissenbach -

CFD Notice: SciFoo attendees
— Arthur Rubin (talk) 08:15, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Joseph Willot
(...) However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words.(...) Thank you.  Jujutacular  talk 16:06, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
 * I just saw the notice at the top of this page. Leave a note here if you want it deleted or if you're going to reword it to remove the copyright violation.  Jujutacular  talk 16:08, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I've re-written the article

Copyright problem: Joseph Igersheimer
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Joseph Igersheimer, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18172563, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Joseph Igersheimer and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Joseph Igersheimer, in your email. See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Joseph Igersheimer with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Joseph Igersheimer. See Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at [ this temporary page]. Leave a note at Talk:Joseph Igersheimer saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! SlimVirgin talk| contribs 06:35, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

Protein interactions in the Gene Wiki
Hi Pierre, your comments (especially as maintainer of the Y2H bot) would be appreciated on a discussion on what to do with protein interactions in the Gene Wiki pages: Portal:Gene_Wiki/Discussion MichaK (talk) 08:19, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

BISC (database)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of BISC (database), and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://into.kobic.re.kr/pubmed/view/id/26201.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 11:31, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Dear CorenSearchBot I can hardly rewrite the simple sentence "is a database of protein-protein interaction" :-) --Plindenbaum (talk) 11:34, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

Autopatrolled
A note that after reviewing your contributions and created articles, I have given you the Autopatrolled userright; use it wisely! :P. Regards, Ironholds (talk) 22:55, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Structure atlas of human genome


A tag has been placed on Structure atlas of human genome requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. EBE123 talkContribs 20:48, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

WikiProject Computational Biology banners
Hi Plindenbaum

I saw that you ahve worked quite a lot on Biological database articles. I thought you might be interested in adding the WikiProject Computational Biology banner to some of these articles using this text on the talk pages WikiProject Computational Biology. I've created a list here: User:Alexbateman/Sandbox/database_list. If you have any other ideas for the WikiProject please do add them to the discussion page. Thanks Alexbateman (talk) 15:19, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of DAnCER (database)


The article DAnCER (database) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable database. No plain-english explanation of what it is. No independent references.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 07:50, 19 August 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Database of protein conformational diversity


The article Database of protein conformational diversity has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable database. No independent references. No claim of notability. No plain english description of what it actual is.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 07:55, 19 August 2011 (UTC)

Please Assess this article starting with the map statements and origins.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haplogroup_J1_(Y-DNA)

JohnLloydScharf (talk) 01:50, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Crystallography Open Database


The article Crystallography Open Database has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * no evidence of notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:38, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

Invitation to events in June and July: bot, script, template, and Gadget makers wanted
I invite you to the yearly Berlin hackathon, 1-3 June. Registration is now open. If you need financial assistance or help with visa or hotel, then please register by May 1st and mention it in the registration form.

This is the premier event for the MediaWiki and Wikimedia technical community. We'll be hacking, designing, teaching, and socialising, primarily talking about ResourceLoader and Gadgets (extending functionality with JavaScript), the switch to Lua for templates, Wikidata, and Wikimedia Labs.

We want to bring 100-150 people together, including lots of people who have not attended such events before. User scripts, gadgets, API use, Toolserver, Wikimedia Labs, mobile, structured data, templates -- if you are into any of these things, we want you to come!

I also thought you might want to know about other upcoming events where you can learn more about MediaWiki customization and development, how to best use the web API for bots, and various upcoming features and changes. We'd love to have power users, bot maintainers and writers, and template makers at these events so we can all learn from each other and chat about what needs doing.

Check out the the developers' days preceding Wikimania in July in Washington, DC and our other events.

Best wishes! - Sumana Harihareswara, Wikimedia Foundation's Volunteer Development Coordinator. Please reply on my talk page, here or at mediawiki.org. Sumana Harihareswara, Wikimedia Foundation Volunteer Development Coordinator 01:53, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

Troubleshooting a page?
Happened upon this page today: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C-jun It has some edits from you in the past related to the protein box, which I think may be related to the errors the page is currently displaying. Any chance you could take a look? My editing skills are nowhere near good enough to figure out or fix whatever is going on. Cheers--CloverMD (talk) 02:44, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Looks fantastic now! I assume you were behind the fix--thanks much! CloverMD (talk) 00:15, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

Category:Sequenced genomes
Category:Sequenced genomes, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor (talk) 06:16, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Category:Personal genome sequenced
Category:Personal genome sequenced, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. — This, that and the other (talk) 07:25, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

KIZ (gene)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of KIZ (gene), and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.genecards.org/cgi-bin/carddisp.pl?gene=PLK1S1.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 15:34, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
 * the article was generated via biogps http://biogps.org/#goto=genereport&id=55857 --Plindenbaum (talk) 15:37, 29 April 2014 (UTC)

ADNP (gene)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of ADNP (gene), and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.gopubmed.org/adnp.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 13:19, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
 * text from the United States National Library of Medicine, which is in the public domain.--Plindenbaum (talk) 13:23, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

Category:Sequenced genomes
Category:Sequenced genomes, which you created, has been nominated for renaming to Category:Lists of sequenced genomes with the deletion of all sub-categories. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 02:17, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:28, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of MINAS


The article MINAS has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No secondary references, no claim of notability, stub, the project appears semi-defunct."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. power~enwiki ( π, ν ) 07:13, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Comparative regulatory genomics database


The article Comparative regulatory genomics database has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No evidence of the significant coverage needed to meet WP:GNG"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DannyS712 (talk) 04:32, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:SWL/mutations associated to


A tag has been placed on Category:SWL/mutations associated to requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 16:03, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of DBASS3/5


The article DBASS3/5 has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Single sentence, self-published & orphan tags dating from 2011"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Amkilpatrick (talk) 10:54, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of S/MARt


The article S/MARt has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Single sentence, outstanding context & orphan tags (since 2011)"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Amkilpatrick (talk) 08:40, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of ExtraTrain for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ExtraTrain is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/ExtraTrain until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Pepper Beast   (talk)  23:10, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Isfinder


The article Isfinder has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No sources located that aren't primary (the paper in question is by the database's creators)."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 19:02, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of KUPS (database) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article KUPS (database) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/KUPS (database) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Pepper Beast   (talk)  16:47, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of RegPhos


The article RegPhos has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "no significant coverage beyond primary cite. RegPhos and KinasePhos databases no longer live"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Amkilpatrick (talk) 20:02, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Variations and drugs database


The article Variations and drugs database has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No indication of notability."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Pepper Beast   (talk)  18:33, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of ECRbase


The article ECRbase has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Does not appear to be a notable database. I did not locate any papers discussing it on Google Scholar or the WMF Library. Only source is from the creators, so it's not independennt."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 03:06, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of ChemProt


The article ChemProt has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Apparently no longer accessible and with no evidence of notability."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mccapra (talk) 17:57, 25 January 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of CADgene


The article CADgene has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No indication of notability. Orphaned for a decade."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Pepper Beast   (talk)  13:52, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

medicine
i love your medical contents keep going :) —— 🌸 Sakura emad 💖 (talk) 09:49, 30 November 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Stanisław Kuczborski


The article Stanisław Kuczborski has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Doesn't seem to meet Notability (academics). Closest thing is 70 pubished works, but nothing is said of their significance and per the guideline 'Simply having authored a large number of published academic works is not considered sufficient'"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

''' This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. ''' Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 9 June 2024 (UTC)