User talk:Plotogate3-7

Question for administrator
Hello administrators, while you mostly aren’t checkusers, could you please help explain why would Blablubbs decided to run a checkuser on me without my consent just to both verify and confirm that I am an abuser of multiple accounts? Sure thing that these accounts are created from the same IP address of range possibly, but checkuser has decided to link these other unrelated accounts to my account listed in block log. However, I am a new user recently registered, so I am unable to edit Wikipedia further, even though I made an add small amount of edit typically 3-10 edits at a time. For me, I do not really believe that these accounts belong to me as a person, instead, those 5 other accounts are actually different people with different perspectives. So these 5 other people never got a chance to edit Wikipedia longer since they were accused of being sockpuppets of me, when in reality, I am not controlling 5 other accounts. So in terms of that, would you look at the comments I made at Teahouse? How did the checkuser knew that I am abusing multiple accounts and being a sockpuppet, when in fact, they are authentic accounts used by independently owned individuals? Could an checkuser know that if I am ready to edit Wikipedia after 6 months passed by? I do not want to be accused of socking. Thanks again.

--Plotogate3-7 (talk) 03:25, 5 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Your talk page access is purely to appeal your block, not to ask questions of the admins. PhilKnight (talk) 05:21, 5 February 2024 (UTC)