User talk:Plowfish

Proposed deletion of Wikismart
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Wikismart, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process
 * Non-notable neologism

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.  role player 10:47, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

October 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Sam Houston State Bearkats has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you.  Tide  rolls  05:07, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. You are removing material from this article claiming that you are doing so because the is unreferenced. That is not standard Wikipedia procedure. Unless there are WP:BLP libel issues, or the material is a hoax, one is supposed to flag unreferenced sections with the appropriate maintenance templates. You should have noticed that the entire article is flagged with an Unreferenced template. Thus, all editors and readers know that the entire article is unsourced. That template is to encourage editors like yourself to add the necessary citations, not delete the material. —  Spike Toronto  05:59, 10 October 2009 (UTC)