User talk:Pluke

Editing other users' pages
Please do not edit other users' pages. It is very bad Wiktionary etiquette. Thanks. &mdash; Paul G 08:23, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Partly my mistake - I should have said "Wikipedia". See the history of my user page. I was a long time ago, but I've only just noticed it. &mdash; Paul G 09:21, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Apology accepted, thanks. Not to worry, I made my fair share of faux pas when I was a newbie too :) &mdash; Paul G 11:30, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Image(s) of the great wall
Hi, Thanks fo uploading your picture(s) of the great wall! I'm admin D-Kuru form Wikimedia Commons. While cleaning up Commons:Category:Great Wall of China I found your image without a local information (Badaling, Mutianyu, ???).

Picture(s):
 * Image:Inside of tower on Great Wall.jpg

Can you please tell me on my commons discussion page where is it from. Thank you D-Kuru 14:08, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

http://gawker.com/5554154/what-does-a-video-look-like-after-1000-youtube-uploads

E-ink_ghost.jpg
Sorry for taking this long to reply. Yes, do as you wish with the E-ink ghost image. I don't know much about moving images to wikicommons, so please feel free to do so (as long as you comply with the cc-by license, of course). -- Iván Sánchez (talk)  09:39, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for the cup of tea!
I'll taste it... although I prefer coffee to tea:) Circuit-fantasist, Circuit dreamer (talk, contribs, email) 15:10, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

Article Feedback deployment
Hey Pluke; I'm dropping you this note because you've used the article feedback tool in the last month or so. On Thursday and Friday the tool will be down for a major deployment; it should be up by Saturday, failing anything going wrong, and by Monday if something does :). Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 23:44, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Blender contribution
"Special effects for episode 6 of Red Dwarf season X, were created using blender.[47] The episode screened in 2012." I have visited the cited reference and found no direct mention the company used Blender on the associated production, not to say they did not, I am positive they did but can find no proof yet. Can you provide this information? If unable, the edit may need be removed as it is unable to be confirmed without statement from the publisher/production and at which point would become an opinion, not fact. Unfortunately, this is subject to WP:YESPOV and classified as opinion until a fact is presented. I will reword it as a suspision until a firm reference is cited.Kevintampa5 (talk) 02:27, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

Blender Contribution 2
That appears to be more appropriate, as well as the link I will post below, which leads to Ben Simonds blog page where he mentions this himself. If you would like to add to what is there, that is good. Otherwise I will do so when I get a little more free time.
 * "Hi Kevin,
 * This might be a more appropriate link: http://www.blendernation.com/2012/10/11/blender-used-for-red-dwarf/ Let me know on my talk page if possible."

http://bensimonds.com/tag/blender/ is Ben's portfolio blog. On a small side note, might I suggest making your edits in a chronological fashion. The newest entries usually are applied toward the bottom of the section it is being added. Yours was placed originally in between tags for 2010 and Blender's origin. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kevintampa5 (talk • contribs) 00:56, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:48, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

File:CPT-Structured_Chart_Example.svg
What software did you use to create this image:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:CPT-Structured_Chart_Example.svg

Do you know how to make them in MS Visio? SharkD  Talk  07:11, 16 November 2016 (UTC)


 * I used inkscape. VIsio would probably be easier--Pluke (talk) 23:21, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 29
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Unparliamentary language, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SNP ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Unparliamentary_language check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Unparliamentary_language?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:55, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 29
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Virginia Water, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page River Bourne.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Meshroom
Hello Pluke,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Meshroom for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion], but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Govvy (talk) 13:57, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Meshroom for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Meshroom is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Meshroom until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Govvy (talk) 14:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

Meshroom moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Meshroom, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. – AssumeGoodWraith  (talk &#124; contribs) 02:53, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

Meshroom moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Meshroom, has been draftified as part of a deletion discussion. – AssumeGoodWraith  (talk &#124; contribs) 05:39, 1 April 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Meshroom
Hello, Pluke. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Meshroom, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:01, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Meshroom


Hello, Pluke. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Meshroom".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 05:41, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: AliceVision (January 11)
 Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:AliceVision Articles for creation help desk] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Tagishsimon was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

Tagishsimon (talk) 02:10, 11 January 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

RS
Re this. You need to look up original research on Wikipedia. Emails to Wikipedia editors are not reliable sources. There are several other problems with your revert, including the reinstatement of self-published sources for claims of a living person, in contravention of WP:BLPRS, and citing a source that has nothing to do with what it purportedly 'cites'. Urve (talk) 18:12, 16 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Hi @Urve some of the references can be culled, maybe, but is anyone seriously questioning whether Chomsky appeared in episode 10?. The removal of this section seems a bit overkill. Could we focus on trimming the refs? Pluke (talk) 18:22, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
 * I have no particular reason to doubt Chomsky was there. Presumably one can just cite the actual episode instead of citing random Facebook posts and emails to Wikipedia editors and sources that don't even mention the subject. I have zero familiarity with the show so I won't be doing that; I edited the article for the sole purpose of removing its terrible sourcing, but my efforts were reverted. Urve (talk) 18:41, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Hi @Urve I've tried to tidy things up a bit. You're right, the sourcing was rather innappropriate, maybe flagging with Failed_verification or similar would be easier than dropping a whole section? Pluke (talk) 20:21, 16 March 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Teachfirst.png
Thanks for uploading File:Teachfirst.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:27, 19 June 2024 (UTC)