User talk:Plumablue

Draft:Dasyueshan National Forest Recreation Area concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Dasyueshan National Forest Recreation Area, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 20:55, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Dasyueshan National Forest Recreation Area


Hello, Plumablue. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Dasyueshan National Forest Recreation Area".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 01:04, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Ways to improve One fixed day off and one flexible rest day
Hi, I'm AngusWOOF. Plumablue, thanks for creating One fixed day off and one flexible rest day!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Article should have a short summary of the amendment for the lead paragraph. The article detail should then go into how the amendment was constructed, proposed and ratified. The actual detailed clause is not needed and doesn't add much to the article, and can be refereed to by an external link, like "full text of amended article 36" and "full text of amended article 24" Also what is the impact of this law and public reception?

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 21:44, 3 December 2017 (UTC)