User talk:Plutonical

February 2022
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.192.76.8.77 (talk) 19:56, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

Hey... Are you okay?
It's about a month too early for April Fools... Care to explain your recent actions? -- Jayron 32 18:55, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
 * I got curious, and intended to delete the resulting section (if created) as soon as it came into existence, so as not to disrupt anything. It was merely a nomination via Twinkle, and wouldn't have actually done anything unless community consensus was established in the few seconds it would have taken me to remove the section. On top of that, the section wasn't actually created, although it did make a red link, which I'm glad you noticed and deleted. TL;DR Got curious over whether Twinkle would actually nominate it (it didn't, thanks to the proactive actions of a certain administrator) had a contingency plan in place if it did, and overall, even in the worst case scenario, disruption would have been minimal. ☢️Plutonical☢️  ᶜᵒᵐᵐᵘⁿᶦᶜᵃᵗᶦᵒⁿˢ  19:01, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Yeah, please don't. You're already the subject of a lengthy ANI thread, and the latest little prank is likely to get you blocked.  Patience is wearing thin.  -- Jayron 32 19:03, 1 March 2022 (UTC)


 * (edit conflict) Considering there is an active, ongoing ANI thread about you screwing around in areas you shouldn't, screwing around in yet another area you shouldn't is not smart. Please be aware that if you screw around one more time, I will block you indefinitely, with no further warnings.  I'm not talking about a WP-space topic ban, or partial blocks, or a mentor; this would be an indefinite sitewide block.  This is not a playground. Also, this is me being nice; there is still the possibility that another admin with less patience will block you indefinitely for this screwing around. Stop it. --Floquenbeam (talk) 19:10, 1 March 2022 (UTC)


 * yeah, that really wasn't the brightest move. I really thought I wasn't going to cause much of a problem, but that was clearly wrong. ☢️Plutonical☢️  ᶜᵒᵐᵐᵘⁿᶦᶜᵃᵗᶦᵒⁿˢ  19:11, 1 March 2022 (UTC)


 * @Floquenbeam I will absolutely stop. This really wasn't a great idea. Thanks for the final warning.
 * Normally I would be reassured by this, but you said very similar things previously at the ANI thread. It is important that you really mean it this time. --Floquenbeam (talk) 19:15, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

just for good measure, I think I'll just stay out of the behind-the-scenes component entirely, including AIV and UAA reports. ☢️Plutonical☢️ ᶜᵒᵐᵐᵘⁿᶦᶜᵃᵗᶦᵒⁿˢ  19:13, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

my edit didn't need a source. it regarded information that was already sourced elsewhere on the page but was updating language to refer to his newly separated wife. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.255.68.101 (talk) 00:11, 6 March 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Whoosh
Template:Whoosh has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 07:25, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

Edit summary
Please refrain from editorializing in edit summaries about what should happen. -- Guerillero  Parlez Moi 14:10, 9 May 2022 (UTC)


 * @Guerillero From what I've seen, an editor can express their opinion in an edit summary if they keep it civil and comply with the rules. I checked Help:Edit Summary and my summary seems to be in complete compliance. I also checked the RFA for Eastern Europe and it seems to be compliant there. Overall, I don't think I did anything wrong, although if there is a policy I'm unaware of that forbids edit summaries from taking an opinion on the subject, I'd like to see it so I can improve in general. ☢️Plutonical☢️  ᶜᵒᵐᵐᵘⁿᶦᶜᵃᵗᶦᵒⁿˢ  14:27, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
 * The DS rules exist to facilitate collaborative editing in areas where tensions are high. Cheering for damage to infrastructure, or in fact for any sort of "win" by a conflict party, is not conducive to that. --Blablubbs (talk) 10:59, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
 * @Blablubbs So it's less of a direct policy thing and more of an intuitive "this could cause friction" thing? Thank you for clearing that up. ☢️Plutonical☢️  ᶜᵒᵐᵐᵘⁿᶦᶜᵃᵗᶦᵒⁿˢ  17:44, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

September 2022
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.192.76.8.74 (talk) 13:54, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

Indefinite block
Hello. The consensus at the ANI discussion (permalink) is to impose an indefinite block on your account. A sanction which I note you, yourself, have asked for. Although later it was suggested to lessen this by only partially blocking you from the project space, which has seen some support, the general sentiment, is still in favour of a sitewide block.

While there is community consensus for the block, it wasn't actually formulated as WP:CBAN and, as such, in my view, it's technically, a normal block. So, if you were to request an unblock from myself, specifically, at any point in the future, I'll be consulting the community rather than unblocking you unliterally. But I don't view that as binding on other admins.

Anyway, best of luck to you in your future endeavors. Regards, El_C 02:51, 18 September 2022 (UTC)

Unblock Request
I note that CU data does not support evidence of block evasion (a good thing). I'm not going to personally take this request to the community for discussion as I won't be around to see it through (vacation). --Yamla (talk) 15:03, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Hello. I recently noticed that that, since your reply, my appeal has been missing from the pending on-wiki appeals section of Category:Requests for unblock, and I was wondering whether this was on purpose or by mistake. Thanks, ☢️Plutonical☢️  ᶜᵒᵐᵐᵘⁿᶦᶜᵃᵗᶦᵒⁿˢ  17:50, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
 * It is not missing from that list. --Yamla (talk) 15:01, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
 * I just checked. I must have mistyped. My mistake. It is, though, not in the "Summary of pending on-wiki appeals" table on that page, and again, I wanted to know if this was purposeful or not. Thanks, ☢️Plutonical☢️  ᶜᵒᵐᵐᵘⁿᶦᶜᵃᵗᶦᵒⁿˢ  15:03, 22 February 2024 (UTC)