User talk:Plyjacks

Next time you create an article, would you please take time to make your assertion of the subject's notability clear? --Lenin and McCarthy |  (Complain here) 04:30, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

LaJean Smith
Greetings,

Please note that the articles on LaJean Smith said she married '9 times' which makes this case prohibitively difficult...how can we find her in the 1900 census? However, given the potential contact info. I will check with the family to see if they have anything. Just don't expect results overnight...this process usually takes a while (given the huge number of cases to go through: I get about 200 messages/month that need to be processed).

Sincerely Robert Young Ryoung122 07:37, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

LaJean Smith
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article LaJean Smith, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add  to the top of LaJean Smith. Cheers, CP 17:56, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Richard Washington (Partially-validated supercentenarian), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template   to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Realkyhick 15:51, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Spgh.JPG)
Thanks for uploading Image:Spgh.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 01:06, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

Gladys Swetland
Should Gladys Swetland, 113, be 'kept' or 'deleted' from Wikipedia? You can vote and/or comment here if you wish:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Gladys_Swetland

Ryoung122 07:11, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Spgh.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Spgh.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 22:43, 26 August 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jackaranga 22:43, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Ffg.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Ffg.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 01:09, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Gfjfh_ruby.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Gfjfh_ruby.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:17, 26 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  CO 2 01:17, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Fggfg.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Fggfg.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 00:11, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

Ruby Muhammad edits
User Plyjacks, your recent edits to the Ruby Muhammad Wikipedia article violate the 'No Original Research' policy. The policy says that material must be sourced, and if self-published, that person must be an 'expert in the field, respected by their peers and published in books, journals, etc.' Please, would you like to show me your credentials that allow you to be an 'expert.' If not, I suggest taking any 'longevity claim' to the proper authority...which is Guinness World Records...whose current expert is...me. So, if you have a claim to make, feel free to make one, but don't make it FIRST on WIKIPEDIA. It must be made first elsewhere.

Sincerely Robert Young Ryoung122 23:39, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

Greetings,

Whenever we are looking for matches in the census, we have to check several factors to be sure the listing is for the correct person. Note that Mr. Filipe Prista Lucas already found a likely 1920 census match (listing Ruby Greer as '15' years old), with the correct location (Sumter Co, GA) and several identifying factors, such as the right mother's name

Based on several reports, we know that she was born in Sandersville, > Washington Co., named Ruby Macie Grayer, and raised in Americus, > Sumter Co. by a woman she believed was her aunt. With this > information, I believe I was able to locate a possible match in the > 1910 census. There, I found a Rubbie M Grier, aged 3 and living in > Americus, Sumter Co. with uncles Paul and Ida Howard. In the 1920 > census, I also found a Buby Greer (Ruby in the original) in Americus,

> Sumter Co., now living with her mother and aged 15.

So, if she was reported to be '15' in January 1920, that would make her born in 1904 and age 103. But since the 1910 census was written closer to the birth event, it is more likely to be true. And the April 1910 census lists her as age 3, which makes her 100 years old.

Note that Ms. Muhammad herself admits that she was 'illiterate until 1946' when she converted to the Nation of Islam and learned to read. So, can we expect someone that can't read and whose age is already distorted by 1920 to really know exactly how old she is? The bottom line: using the principles of proofs of birth (and not proofs of existence), the expert opinion is that she is '100 years old.' For the sake of some, we allow them to note that her 'claimed age' is 110...we call that a 'longevity claim.' But in reality, it's not likely to be true.

If, however, new evidence comes to light, feel free to contact someone such as myself, the GRG, Louis Epstein, etc. to investigate.

Sincerely Robert Young Ryoung122 23:56, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Fggfg.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Fggfg.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 11:20, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Habib Miyan
Plyjacks, although Habib Miyan 'now' claims birth in 1869, he previously claimed birth in 1872 and before that, 1878. Since he started with '1878' we're sticking with that one. Also, his 'ID document' (even though the name is of a different person) says '1878'. The bottom line: the claim is ludicrous, and he can't even keep his story straight. Ryoung122 08:19, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Are the Oldest-Old or Final Few notable?
Thanks for the comments, but you have to click on the 'this article's entry' to post a comment on the AFD page. Your comment was just pasted on the 'talk' page.

Regards Robert

Greetings, User Brown-Haired Girl has waged a campaign to wipe out the entire 'supercentenarians' field on Wikipedia. This has included:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2007_November_1#Category:Supercentenarian_trackers

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Robert_Young_%28longevity_claims_researcher%29

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louis_Epstein_%28supercentenarian_tracker%29

And, even, a man dead over 100 years:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Thoms

I find it incredulous that one would attack even the man who invented the term 'folklore' and started the field of 'supercentenarian tracking.'

Such mass hysteria seems to be working. User BHG is one of the top-10 editors by edit count on Wikipedia and has lots of friends. I can't imagine most WWI veteran articles surviving if this trend continues. I do urge everyone who considers tracking the oldest-old, whether WWI vets or no, to chime in on these debates.

Sincerely, Robert Young Ryoung122 17:10, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Nestor at 115.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Nestor at 115.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:51, 14 November 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Genisock2 13:51, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

Ruby Muhammad
Please review the concept of No original research. Until this material is published in third party, independent reliable sources, we cannot accept original research on any article, and especially none in those articles that fall under the aegis of Wikipedia's policies on biographies of living people. Cheers, CP 03:41, 1 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Please stop. If you continue to add original research regarding the biographies of living people to Wikipedia, you WILL be blocked. Please understand that we cannot include such material until it is published in third party, independent reliable sources. Cheers, CP 23:43, 1 December 2007 (UTC)


 * I also suggest not conducting personal attacks off-wiki, as you did on the World's Oldest People Forum. Please understand that Wikipedia can only report what is verifiable from reliable sources, it is NOT a repository for original research: yours or anyone else's. Also, I note that it's very difficult to yell at someone on a talk page, especially when they uses words like "please." Cheers, CP 03:21, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

Hi Plyjacks, it should be noted that in the context of what Wikipedia calls a "realiable source" (ie/ WP:RS) the source you added is not considered to be one. Now the information that is on that unrealiable source may be correct, but in the context of an encyclopedia until that information becomes more mainstream (ie/ by appearing in more realiable sources) in cannot be used. This isn't the fault of Wikipedia, instead is a fault found in inherently unnotable material that appears in Wikipedia. Until these items become more mainstream, they will almost always suffer this fate. What needs to happen with Ruby (say) is that her real DOB should be published more widely and reported as such rather than it appearing in a obscure web resource. Thanks Shot info 05:56, 2 December 2007 (UTC)


 * I have opened up a request for comment on a discussion that you had been previously involved in regarding Ruby Muhammad. If you wish to participate, your input would be highly valued, and you may comment here. Cheers, CP 07:34, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Alberto Yoip
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Alberto Yoip, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add  to the top of Alberto Yoip. Cheers, CP 18:04, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Item of interest
see this. — Rlevse  •  Talk  • 23:20, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
 * If that's so, you need to reply to that effect on that commons thread. If you don't have a commons account, create one. — Rlevse  •  Talk  • 00:34, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Terry Teene
Email me and let me know a bit more about you, and why Terry would want to hear from you and I will gladly send you the most recent address I have for him. (a Tyler, Texas address). I hope you understand that I try to respect everyone's privacy. User:Pedant (talk) 18:53, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
 * If you want Terry Teene's address, set your wikipedia settings so that I can email it to you. User:Pedant (talk) 06:03, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
 * I would prefer to send you email through this link to avoid revealing my own email address. If you want me to give you Terry Teene's address, set your wikipedia settings so that I can email it to you.  User:Pedant (talk) 21:59, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
 * It appears that our other contributor on the Ronald McDonald article, Hank, may be a troll; I would take anything he says with a grain of salt. --Jeremy ( Blah blah... ) 06:48, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

reply
It doesn't matter whether Willard Scott says he created Ronald, there is a contemporaneous record that shows that Ronald existed before Willard created him. I've seen the newspaper photograph and caption, and the original costume. User:Pedant (talk) 05:58, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

June 2008
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution.

--Jeremy ( Blah blah... ) 16:41, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

Ronald McDonald
When you go to look things up use this template:

cite book

These are the sections you will need:

If you print this out, you can use it as a guide line for your search. Anything that you put in I will not tough as long as it meets the standards of WP:NPOV.

--Jeremy ( Blah blah... ) 02:41, 25 July 2008 (UTC)


 * I may be willing to support an unblock of this account, however we are going to need a full allocution of your sockpuppetry before we can trust your apology. If you could list below the full list of alternate accounts you have created, we can check to see if you are really honest, or if you are still violating the rules about alternate accounts.  Please provide that list below so that admins can act on this unblock request.  Thank you.  --Jayron32. talk . contribs  03:58, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

Here is the list you requested:

Braintreedude28 Clowniac Hankzimer Ihjmwt2petwbgwh Kegatic Kgcodyjam Knimper Max33well44 Mcdonaldsfreak82 Mcmastermm Mcmasterofwiki Mcwiz6567 NM76UU Randyga7755 Rm1963 Rubyrox1907 Syjacks Timaroyhack Ufoundme2

Those are all the sockpuppets that I used. 173.48.88.23 (talk) 14:30, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

linkified
To make the list a little easier to check... — Travis talk  15:48, 19 November 2008 (UTC) and

Sorry, I forgot to log in.Plyjacks (talk) 16:52, 19 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Um, big deal, this proves nothing; that's just the contents of Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of Plyjacks. --jpgordon&#8711;&#8710;&#8711;&#8710; 17:31, 19 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Yeah, are there any out there that we haven't "caught" yet, keeping in mind that it would be rather trivial for us to check this out... --Jayron32. talk . contribs 18:00, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

The reason is I came back is promise to behave and keep wikipedia as safe as possible. Also never to create another sockpuppet.Plyjacks (talk) 01:52, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

I'm going to tell the truth right now. I only created one more sockpuppet 2 months ago named Timmknows. Plyjacks (talk) 16:54, 21 November 2008 (UTC)


 * In order to verify your claims, I am filing a new checkuser report at Requests for checkuser/Case/Plyjacks. Please await those results.  Once the results come back, we can contact the admins who have blocked you in the past, and start a public discussion at WP:ANI over lifting your ban and allowing you to edit again.  This may take a day or two, please be patient and allow the process to work itself out.  Thank you.  --Jayron32. talk . contribs  17:30, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

You have been unblocked...
Per consensus here:. Please return to productive editing at Wikipedia. Via con dios... --Jayron32. talk . contribs 03:43, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the Barnstar
It's about time someone appreciated me. Current events become the past, we always need new persons to take up the editing work, to learn the system, etc. That's why I believe in mentorship.

Hopefully you will refrain from sockpuppeteering in the future. It's not just that it's wrong...it's that creating a false identity is like hiding in the closet...everyone could tell that "RubyRox1907" or "Hankzimer" was you...accepting yourself as you are is part of growing up.

Happy Thanksgiving Ryoung 122 03:44, 28 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the second award. Now where is Bart? Ryoung 122 20:28, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Sue Kay
A tag has been placed on Sue Kay requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Macromonkey (talk) 17:41, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Keith Cody in 2009.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Keith Cody in 2009.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NW ( Talk ) 14:50, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

Oldest man navbox
I noticed that you have been adding navbox code to a number of articles. In fact the code should be put in a navbox template so that it can be properly transcluded on relevant articles. Then changes to the template will be reflected on all those articles. Did you get the code from an existing template and why did you choose 1973 as the cut off date? I think this would be a great template to create and would be happy to take on the task, but I don't want to duplicate effort if a template already exists. Thanks. – ukexpat (talk) 21:19, 21 July 2009 (UTC)


 * I think you missed my point - the navbox should be created as a template so that it can be easily reused and the text only edited once when changes are made. I'll take a crack at it. – ukexpat (talk) 03:11, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Frederick Butterfield
An article that you have been involved in editing, Frederick Butterfield, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/. Thank you.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Cheers, CP 00:36, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Ruby Muhammad
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Ruby Muhammad. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/Ruby Muhammad. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:10, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Jsullivan.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Jsullivan.jpeg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 01:34, 12 August 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. 72.88.68.103 (talk) 01:34, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

Jan Goossenaerts
Please help with this article, someones trying to delete it, we need all the help we can get, so spread the word as much as you can, thanks. Longevitydude (talk) 14:06, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

Hey LD. Long time no see! I'm not on wikipedia anymore but you can find me on Facebook. Plyjacks (talk) 22:44, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
 * I havent been able to get on facebook as much as id like, I just figured maybe you would like to help save the article I gave you a link to, everyones help matters, its nice talking to you again. Longevitydude (talk) 20:02, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

Longevity COI
Please participate in a discussion about users with conflicts of interest editing the topic of longevity. Your name has been mentioned here. JJB 20:52, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom
You are involved in a recently-filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Arbitration/Requests and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use—
 * Arbitration/Requests;
 * Arbitration guide.

Thanks, JJB 23:53, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

Arbitration/Requests/Case/Longevity
An Arbitration case involving you has been opened, and is located here. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Arbitration/Requests/Case/Longevity/Evidence. Please submit your evidence within one week, if possible. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Arbitration/Requests/Case/Longevity/Workshop.

On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, NW ( Talk ) 14:57, 22 November 2010 (UTC)


 * If you are interested in providing evidence for this case, please see this note about a deadline. NW ( Talk ) 18:52, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

Re: John F. Keenan State Senator Article
Hi Plyjacks, thanks for the message. I've taken a look at the article per your request, and have removed two of the inline tags where references have been placed. The banner at page-top however, should remain in place until more references are added to the article. I hope this addresses your concerns :). -- WikHead (talk) 22:45, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
 * No problem at all :). Best wishes and best of luck to you in the new year! -- WikHead (talk) 23:16, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

Re: Michael W. Morrissey
You too, Happy New Year. Designate (talk) 00:24, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

Repost of Robert Young (gerontologist)
A tag has been placed on requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, place the template hang on underneath the other template on the article and put a note on the page's discussion page saying why this article should stay. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of continuing to recreate the page. Thank you. David in DC (talk) 18:59, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
 * I've deleted the page as the original concern of the AfD - that there were no sources addressing him as WP:BIO requires - was not solved. Unless there are at least sources to indicate WP:BASIC is met, it would be best not to recreate the article again. SmartSE (talk) 23:03, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

Arbitration/Requests/Case/Longevity
An arbitration case regarding Longevity has now closed and the final decision is viewable at the link above. The following remedies have been enacted:
 * 1) Standard discretionary sanctions are enacted for all articles related to Longevity (broadly interpreted);
 * 2) is indefinitely prohibited from editing, commenting on, or otherwise participating in any Wikipedia process related to articles about longevity (broadly interpreted);
 * 3) is banned from Wikipedia for a period of one year;
 * 4) WikiProject World's Oldest People is urged to seek experienced Wikipedia editors who will act as mentors to the project and assist members in improving their editing and their understanding of Wikipedia policies and community norms;
 * 5) Within seven days of the conclusion of this case, all parties must either delete evidence sub-pages in their user space or request deletion of them using the db-author or db-self template.

For the Arbitration Committee, AGK  [&bull; ] 22:05, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

Arbitration enforcement
This is to let you know that I have asked for the Arbitration Enforcement case relating to User: NickOrnstein to be extended to cover off-wiki canvassing through the 110 Club internet forum. Please comment there. Itsmejudith (talk) 15:08, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

File:Wikiphoto.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Wikiphoto.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:39, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

File:Supercent barn star.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Supercent barn star.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда . 21:13, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Better source request for File:John Kerry second Secretary of State Portrait.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:John Kerry second Secretary of State Portrait.jpg. You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:50, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

November 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=581503458 your edit] to List of supporters of same-sex marriage in the United States may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:38, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
 * maine/ |publisher=The Washington Post|date=September 25, 2013 |accessdate=September 27, 2013}} (R) (1989-1993)
 * Tubbs Jones's Issue Positions (Political Courage Test)|publisher=Project Vote Smart|quote=a Should same-sex couples be allowed to marry? [...] Yes|year=2008|accessdate=January 11, 2013}}</

Speedy deletion nomination of Mark Fisher (Businessman)


A tag has been placed on Mark Fisher (Businessman) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. TheLongTone (talk) 18:36, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

May 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=608449167 your edit] to Mark Fisher (Businessman) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:26, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
 * utm_content=buffer4179e&amp;utm_medium=social&amp;utm_source=facebook.com&amp; l|title=Westfield native Mark Fisher launches Republican run for governor of Massachusetts|work=[[

Nomination of Mark Fisher (Businessman) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mark Fisher (Businessman) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Mark Fisher (Businessman) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --Hirolovesswords (talk) 23:01, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mark Fisher (Businessman), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Sullivan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

Intentional disruption designed to illustrate a point
Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but your recent edits, such as those to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joseph Avellone, appear to be intentional disruptions designed to illustrate a point. Edits designed for the deliberate purpose of drawing opposition, including making edits you do not agree with or enforcing a rule in a generally unpopular way, are highly disruptive and can lead to a block or ban. If you feel that a policy is problematic, the policy's talk page is the proper place to raise your concerns. If you simply disagree with someone's actions in an article, discuss it on the article talk page or, if direct discussion fails, through dispute resolution. If consensus strongly disagrees with you even after you have made proper efforts, then respect the consensus, rather than trying to sway it with disruptive tactics. Thank you. --Hirolovesswords (talk) 17:50, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joseph Avellone (2nd nomination)
You are invited to join the discussion at Articles for deletion/Joseph Avellone (2nd nomination). Thanks. Hirolovesswords (talk) 22:49, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

Clarification motion
A case (Longevity) in which you were involved has been modified by which changed the wording  of the discretionary sanctions section to clarify that the scope applies to pages, not just articles. For the arbitration committee -- S Philbrick (Talk)  15:53, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)