User talk:Pmart804

Nomination of Zack Fuss for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zack Fuss is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Zack Fuss until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Dennis Brown (talk) 18:22, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Zack Fuss


A tag has been placed on Zack Fuss, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia for multiple reasons. Please see the page to see the reasons. If the page has since been deleted, you can ask me the reasons by leaving a message on my user talk page.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. &mdash; KuyaBriBri Talk 18:38, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Zack Fuss


A tag has been placed on Zack Fuss requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Zad68 (talk) 18:57, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Some homework
before you try again. I'd suggest WP:BIO for a start, and WP:RS about reliable independent sources. Also, if it applies, WP:COI about editing about yourself or subjects close to you. That's conflict of interest. A tip for the future: when you create an article, don't edit it while not signed in. Two reasons - the first is that if you decide against it, you can request deletion easily if you are the only editor, and we don't know that you are the IP, and secondly, it makes some editors suspicious that someone is trying to give the impression that more than one person is editing. Either way, it's best to be logged in. I feel sure we'll be seeing Zack again some day, but it takes more than being known in a local community and having student successes. I must say it was heartening to hear about a student not majoring in basketball or something like that, but that's not enough. Good luck (pass it on if it's not you...) Peridon (talk) 19:05, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Do feel free to contact me on my talk page if anything isn't clear. Policies are written by people who know what they're talking about, just like manuals are. Peridon (talk) 19:12, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Zack Fuss


A tag has been placed on Zack Fuss requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Zad68 (talk) 19:18, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

March 2012
This is your last warning. The next time you create an inappropriate page, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 19:25, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Zack Blake Fuss


A tag has been placed on Zack Blake Fuss requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Rorshacma (talk) 19:59, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruptive editing. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 20:10, 1 March 2012 (UTC)