User talk:Pmccacal

Welcome!
Hello, Pmccacal, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Trailokya Shumsher Jung Bahadur Rana, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Ruby  Murray  09:54, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Trailokya Shumsher Jung Bahadur Rana


A tag has been placed on Trailokya Shumsher Jung Bahadur Rana requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://tlrana.blogspot.co.uk/2014/04/1.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ruby  Murray  09:54, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

Copyright
Sorry, but you saying you have permission from the original authors is not sufficient. That text is copyright to them because it has been published. We cannot accept copyright text or images because Wikipedia is licensed under Creative Commons CC-BY-SA 3.0 for use by anyone anywhere any which way. Only text that is first published herecan be used, along with text that is in the public domain by being old enough for the copyright to have expired (in most cases, 70 years after the author's death) or by being published by certain mostly US government departments. An author can license their work under CC-BY-SA, but this gives everyone the right to use it - and this cannot be undone. Once licensed, always licensed. If the authors of this text decide to license it, they would have to contact us themselves - please see WP:COPYVIO for more details. There would have to be reliable independent sources provided - and the blogspot site would not count as one of those (and nor do weebly, Facebook and many other things - see WP:RS). Once again, I'm sorry about this, but we have to be very careful about copyright as lawyers and courts can be very expensive. Peridon (talk) 11:48, 17 April 2014 (UTC)