User talk:Pmeetonline

December 2012
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you.  MER-C 06:10, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

Hey, I was just trying to add the link of a site I regulary read because I though that would help the people. I was not trying to spam. Pmeetonline (talk) 06:27, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Nokia Lumia 620 with this edit. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 07:15, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

January 2013
This is your last warning. The next time you insert a spam link, as you did at Huawei Ascend W1, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Biker Biker (talk) 07:37, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for adding spam links. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia and potentially penalized by search engines. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Someguy1221 (talk) 08:11, 14 January 2013 (UTC)


 * I have a bit of trouble with this request: you were told a month ago that the link/site you were adding was inappropriate, and told that if you did it again you would be blocked. However, here we are a month later and you seem surprised.  Care to explain? (✉→BWilkins←✎) 12:49, 15 January 2013 (UTC)


 * I'm leaving this for another admin to consider, but after looking at all of your contribs, it turns out that all you've done is to add links to technokraze.in. You even removed a link to another site already listing the specs for one phone, added some specs already in the article and added a link to technokraze as a reference to the duplicate information. This is why you were blocked. And unless you can address this issue properly in the above request and convince us that you'll follow the rules and contribute (not just links) you are unlikely to be unblocked. Bjelleklang -  talk 12:24, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

I removed the link to a blog because of the following reasons. The link was in reference to the beginning words Sony Xperia Z, which was inappropriate. another thing I noticed that there were more than three links to the same blog which appeared spamming to me. Though I am not a moderator or administrator, I removed that which appeared like spamming and inappropriate to make Wikipedia useful. Wikipedia is a source of useful information and not for spamming. So, I did that. If that was wrong, I apologize for that and will not do it again. Now, to the link pointing to technokraze. I am a fan of technokraze and believe every content from them. They are accurate and never misleading. This is the reason I am adding the reference links to them. I am getting many information from there so I am adding its reference link.Pmeetonline (talk) 04:20, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Technokraze is not a reliable source (WP:RS) and your repeated addition of the link, despite being warned not to, is why you were blocked. Until you accept that and promise not to add links to that or similar sites again there is no chance that an admin will unblock you. --Biker Biker (talk) 08:05, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I think it is highly likely that you are directly connected to the site and therefore have a conflict of interest (WP:COI). According to the website's about us page, one of the co-founder/owners is a Meet Patel. Hmmm "Meet Patel" / "pmeetonline". Per WP:DUCK I think you have as much chance as a whelk in a supernova of getting your account unblocked now. --Biker Biker (talk) 08:15, 18 January 2013 (UTC)


 * So what do you intend to do if unblocked? Max Semenik (talk) 08:29, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

I will try to expand the article related to technology, gadgets, education without adding inappropriate links to it. I apologize for adding those links in the previous edits. Will not do the same again. I will try to add useful information to the topic and will try to help in expanding the topic to the best of my knowledge.