User talk:Pmg1000

About original research and biographies of living persons
Hi there. I see you recently added to Gerald Posner. The problem is that Wikipedians are not allowed to publish their own research. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, which means that depends on what secondary reliable sources say. The difference between primary and secondary sources, as defined on Wikipedia, can be confusing at first. Basically, a photograph is a primary source, and a newspaper article that analyzes and interprets the photograph is a secondary source. Government documents are generally primary sources, and although primary sources are not forbidden from use on Wikipedia, there are certain issues with using them. First, they can not be interpreted, analyzed, or used in a way to make them say anything that they do not already say. For example, unless a primary source explicitly says, "Gerald Posner misinterpreted a government document", you can not use it to back up such a claim. Interpreting primary sources is the job of secondary sources, not Wikipedia. Second, primary sources are heavily restricted in their use in biographical articles. This is prevent Wikipedians from interpreting primary sources to make harmful statements. Unless a newspaper, book, magazine, or other reliable secondary source has made a statement already, Wikipedia can not report it. If you have further questions, you can ask at the tea house (a forum for new users on Wikipedia) or the help desk (a forum for technical questions about editing Wikipedia). You might also want to browse through our core content policies. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 15:42, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for you help
Thank you, NinjaRobotPirate, for explaining why my edit was removed. I am new to this and usually publish in academic journals where primary sources are the gold standard. However, I take your point that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and thus only secondary sources are acceptable. As more reviews of God’s Bankers have now begun to be published which cite The National Archive document which I mentioned, I will attempt to rewrite by original edit using these secondary sources only. I also see the importance of using the Edit Summary to maintain a log of all changes and hope to use this and do so correctly. Pmg1000 (talk) 11:43, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

 * Hi Pmg1000! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission.  I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
 * The Teahouse new editor help space
 * Wikipedia Help pages

-- 14:19, Monday, April 27, 2015 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

 * Hi Pmg1000! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission.  I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
 * The Teahouse new editor help space
 * Wikipedia Help pages

-- 15:12, Monday, April 27, 2015 (UTC)