User talk:Pmoszczy/Basal dendrite/Bshoukeir24 Peer Review

Lead evaluation: I am not sure what new information has been added but the lead has concise and sufficient information to build off of for the creation other sections. More information could be added to the information present right now to make it a more thorough over view of the content. However, this is all that is present in the article and I'm not sure what the plan is to develop it. There are no titled subsections. Content

Content evaluation: Needs more information and a lot more sources to develop the article and the content. (Not sure if this is a new article started from scratch, though.)

Organization evaluation: There's a lot of potential subsection to break down this article.

Tone: There is a mention of a study, that could be considered as arguing for one side. Maybe rephrase how you want to state the finding of the article.

Overall evaluation: The topic has a lot of potential in terms of the content that should be/could be added. It doesn't seem like this article has been worked on, and more sources and information definitely need to be added. Subsections are important too. The article seems underdeveloped but I'm not sure if this was a new article that users DID add to and this is their work.z