User talk:Pmpanta

Speedy deletion of LightGov LLC, Inc.
A tag has been placed on LightGov LLC, Inc., requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. Paranormal Skeptic (talk) 14:47, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of LightGov LLC
A tag has been placed on LightGov LLC requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you.  TN ‑  X   - Man  15:05, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 15:48, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy because your account is being used only for spam, advertising, or promotion. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text below. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 15:51, 22 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Hi, good talking to you over IRC, thanks for being understanding about the notability criteria. Here's some links we were talking about, for reference:


 * WP:Notability
 * Corporation notability
 * WP:Reliable sources
 * User:Pmpanta/LightGov <--for working on the article in your userspace

I've left a note for the admin who blocked you asking if they'd be ok with unblocking you if you'll agree not to recreate the article and only work on it in your userspace. Would you be willing to agree to that? When you think the article's ready, you can show it to me or another experienced user and we can move it to the mainspace if we think it's suitable. Sound like a deal? (Not that I think you would, but I should say that the block would be much less likely to be undone if you were to go back on your word). What do you think? I'll watch your talk page so you can reply to me here. Peace, delldot   &nabla;.  20:20, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

I've unblocked your account and you're free to edit once again. Thanks for your willingness to help. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 23:18, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Purushottam Panta


The article Purushottam Panta has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners or ask at Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Baseball  Watcher  01:01, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Kaulantak Peeth


A tag has been placed on Kaulantak Peeth requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://kaulantakpeeth.com/en/kaulantakpeeth.php. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. JamesG5 (talk) 03:46, 31 March 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mahayogi Satyendra Nath


The article Mahayogi Satyendra Nath has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. JamesG5 (talk) 03:49, 31 March 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Anita Silwal for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anita Silwal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Anita Silwal until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Usedtobecool ☎️ 03:15, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

Hi Usedtobecool, Saw your message just a couple of days back. I would be happy to provide more citation and evidence to keep the Anita Silwal page live. Please specify which statement in the article needs further reference. Pmpanta (talk) 02:52, 20 October 2021 (UTC)