User talk:Pmronchi

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Oore (talk) 18:23, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

There is already an article at memristor. You may want to contribute your information there. Oore (talk) 18:24, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Theos Casimir Bernard
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Theos Casimir Bernard, and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: Theos Bernard. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page&mdash; you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 11:53, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

May 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Theos Casimir Bernard, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Theos Casimir Bernard was changed by Pmronchi (u) (t) deleting 16502 characters on 2008-05-22T23:58:38+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 23:58, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Theos Bernard
Hi, Remember the dot! Thank you for merging the history in the article I started. Sorry for the error. Carpe diem! Carpe Wikipedia! Pmronchi (talk) 02:22, 25 May 2008 (UTC)


 * You're welcome! Although I should tell you I'm sorry I did it a bit sloppily. This is the first history merge I've done and it didn't come through quite perfectly. —Remember the dot (talk) 02:25, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

Tyrant flycatcher and lists of genera
The non-alphabeticness (is that a word?) of the genus list is deliberate, it is what is known as taxonomic order. Taxanomic order reflects how closely related the various genera are to each other, for example Capsiempisis followed by Tyrannulus as both are tyrannulets. Sabine's Sunbird  talk  21:47, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
 * No need to apologise, it isn't intuitive. I just don't like reverting without explaining. Sabine's Sunbird  talk  22:00, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Live sand
Kudos on being the first person I've pointed at WP:WTAF who then went and wrote the article. :) —chaos5023 (talk) 03:35, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

Malacolog
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Malacolog, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.malacolog.org.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 18:29, 13 March 2011 (UTC)


 * I have deleted this article as an unambiguous copyright infringement, as the prose was almost verbatim copied from the source. While such copying for an informational listing may be considered fair use, it is against Wikipedia copyright policy and such articles will be deleted and editors who repeatedly add copyrighted material will be blocked. Regardless of how much other content they have published and copyrighted, the page you copied from is clearly marked "©1998 - 2010 All Rights Reserved" and your evaluation of how the copyright holders of the Malacolog description would view their convenience or fairness has no bearing on the issue. We cannot reproduce text unless it has been explicitly released under a free license except for brief quotations "used to illustrate a point, establish context, or attribute a point of view or idea" in accordance with Non-free content. If it can be written in your own words, as it can be in this case, then it must be rewritten from scratch. VernoWhitney (talk) 14:24, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Invitation
— Ganeshk  ( talk ) 22:38, 13 March 2011 (UTC)


 * No problem. Thank you for your contributions. Happy editing! — Ganeshk  ( talk ) 23:09, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Sea Slug Forum


A tag has been placed on Sea Slug Forum requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 00:40, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

About gastropods
Hello P. M. Ronchi, thank you for contributing gastropod related articles. Your articles about Berghia species are good, useful, welcomed and very appreciated (although I have copyedited and tweaked some of them a bit). For more effective cooperation I would like to share few things with you: Categories of gastropods by country of by geography is not appropriate per WikiProject Gastropods/Categories. Also it is usually not good to duplicate wikilinks in the "See also" section that are mentioned in the article already (and also links that are references allready). ITIS is not very good source for gastropods and usually does not even to be mentioned in the article, but is is good for vernacular names. Feel free to get inspiration of changes I have made or in other articles or in the WikiProject Gastropods talk page for your further creations. Have a nice editing. --Snek01 (talk) 01:19, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

Copyright problem: Berghia coerulescens
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Berghia coerulescens, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://www.seaslugforum.net/showall/bergcoer, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Berghia coerulescens and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Berghia coerulescens, in your email. See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Berghia coerulescens with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Berghia coerulescens. See Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at [ this temporary page]. Leave a note at Talk:Berghia coerulescens saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Snek01 (talk) 02:52, 17 March 2011 (UTC)


 * I have removed sentences that you have copied from http://www.seaslugforum.net/showall/bergcoer It is corrected now, but pay attention to informations about copyright above. Thanks. --Snek01 (talk) 02:52, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

Copyright problem: Pindar River
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Pindar River, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://www.uttaranchaltourism.in/pindari-glacier.html, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Pindar River and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Pindar River, in your email. See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Pindar River with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Pindar River. See Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at [ this temporary page]. Leave a note at Talk:Pindar River saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Snek01 (talk) 03:02, 17 March 2011 (UTC)


 * A contributor copyright investigation has been opened regarding your contributions. It is at Contributor copyright investigations/Pmronchi. MER-C 04:18, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

CCI case opened
Hello, Pmronchi. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Contributor copyright investigations concerning your contributions in relation to Wikipedia's copyrights policy. The listing can be found here. For some suggestions on responding, please see Responding to a CCI case. Thank you. GrooveDog FOREVER 18:13, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

CCI case opened: Apologize, comment and some questions
First of all, I want to apologize to the reviewers of my contributions for the extra work that you take over your shoulders, due to an involuntary misunderstanding from my part.

Well, it seems that I am learning the hard way a few things about copyright violations. Thanks to a note by User:Moonriddengirl, it now seems clear to me what my mistake was:

"[...](Some contributors are under the mistaken belief that if the source is cited, exact duplication of text is not a copyright infringement. This is not the case. United States copyright law does permit limited use of copyrighted text under fair use, but makes very clear that 'acknowledging the source of the copyrighted material does not substitute for obtaining permission.') [...]"

I am certainly one of those editors. All of my errors were made under that wrong assumption that I was making contributions under fair use. I feel embarrassed.

In order to help you, I will restrain from contributing text until around mid or late-April (or more, if you tell me so), even for articles not present in the review listing that you are using, because I am not sure if any new contribution from me can alter that listing and complicate your work further. I will neither contribute with the addition of internal links or disambiguation pages for the same reason. If I am allowed to contribute without hindering your work, please let me know.

Thanks for your great work to make WP a great encyclopedia, and again, I apologize for the extra work.

P.M.Ronchi


 * Some questions
 * Can I assist your work in any way? (besides restraining my editions, I mean)
 * After the revision case is closed, I would like to rewrite some of the text you find faulty. In order to be sure that I am not infringing the copyright policy, is there a forum where to ask or a a group of editors willing to help with doubts?

Pmronchi (talk) 19:01, 25 March 2011 (UTC)


 * There's nothing preventing you from contributing further to Wikipedia, and there are plenty of ways to do so without writing large new articles or significantly expanding existing content. Some examples include referencing existing content (including instances of the ubiquitous ), copyediting, adding images, giving feedback on existing articles, formatting articles, etc. All this and more at CAT:BACK. User:SuggestBot aims to find articles in these categories that you may be interested in editing.


 * Furthermore, you can help fill out the red links at (say) List of non-marine molluscs of Brazil with short stubs. The stubs need not be more than one line long (for instance Dizoniopsis herberti), and you can always come back and expand them later when you are more confident about contributing non-copied content. There are similar lists at WikiProject Marine life and WikiProject Gastropods.


 * Can you recall any instances where you copied text verbatim from your sources, and what were these sources? (This will expedite the handling of your case.)


 * There is no formal forum for this, but MRG, VernoWhitney and myself are happy to assist with this matter. . MER-C 03:05, 26 March 2011 (UTC)

File:TheosBernard showing BaddhaPadmasana.jpg missing description details
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as: is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.
 * File:TheosBernard showing BaddhaPadmasana.jpg

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 04:28, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:36, 24 November 2015 (UTC)