User talk:Pmvan

March 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Learning sciences has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you.  Egmontaz  ♤  talk  20:42, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Talk:Learning sciences. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Clarince63 (talk) 20:46, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Please do not remove content from pages without explanation, as you did with this edit to Learning sciences. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing.  Egmontaz  ♤  talk  20:55, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: the talk page edits were not remotely vandalism, they were explaining the content deletion. Which makes the deletion itself not "removing content without explanation."
 * To Pmvan: Welcome! Sorry we got off to the wrong start here. Please discuss major edits on the talk page so we can avoid this sort of thing in the future. Let me know if you have any questions! FCSundae ∨  ☃   (talk) 20:58, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Learning sciences has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://edtechdev.wordpress.com/2009/11/16/cognitive-load-theory-failure/ (matching the regex rule \bwordpress\.com). If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 21:11, 7 March 2010 (UTC)