User talk:Pn3546/sandbox

1. What does the article (or section) do well? This article, specifically the cultural insensitivity section, does a wonderful job at capturing and summarizing two controversial/complex events. It’s hard to remain unbiased, especially considering the nature of its topic matter, but this section does it well.

2. What changes would you suggest overall? I know you’re still working through it but I definitely would add more content specifically to the History section. You touch on the early years of the company a lot but what about modern times? Any M&A history? Any major roadblocks/obstacles the company faces outside of the taboo events? Food for thought! :)

3. What is the most important thing that the author could do to improve his/her contribution? I would make sure that information throughout your article is not duplicated as it waters down the impact you want to have. (Ex. “SHEIN (company) section v. History). Everything you include should be able to stand alone and not be repeated throughout the article.

4. Did you glean anything from your classmate's work that could be applicable to your own? If so, let him/her know! I really like the idea of having a timeline - I have a “History” section too, but I think having it laid out like yours is a really concise, effective way to capture major events.