User talk:Pneikro

Regarding your userpage
Per our guidelines on user pages, user pages are (like the rest of the encyclopedia) not for promotion of any ideology, nor is it a blog (again, like the rest of the site), nor is it meant to host sermons (again, like the rest of the site). Mentioning who you are and what beliefs you hold is one thing, but your current userpage (whatever belief system it advocates) is inappropriate. All this is because Wikipedia is not a soapbox or pulpit for anyone to preach any belief system from.

A simple test is this: would you or reasonable others have a problem with a userpage that similarly advocated Satanism, Atheism, Wicca, or Islam? If you would not want someone posting sermons for those belief systems, then it is inappropriate.

You still have a chance to remove the problematic material, or you can put db-self at the top of your user page. Ian.thomson (talk) 10:56, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

I've gone ahead and deleted your userpage. I hope your future edits are constructive. Please ensure they are. So far, it looks like WP:NOTHERE. I encourage you to help build the encyclopedia. Thank you, and happy editing. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 19:04, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

April 2016
This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on other people again, as you did at User talk:Anna Frodesiak, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. ''Spouting stuff like "Ur an idiot. Now there's blood on ur hands. I promise you will regret it." is a personal attack and will not be tolerated.'' Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 00:45, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

What Wikipedia is
Wikipedia is (and only is) an encyclopedia that summarizes professionally-published mainstream academic or journalistic sources, without additional elaboration or commentary. We are not a place to promote any ideology, nor a pulpit to preach from. If you are interested in neutrally summarizing material from mainstream academic and journalistic sources, you are welcome to. But if you would rather engage in other behaviors, it would be best if you found something else to do on another site.

We are not WikiLeaks (that "site for important leaks to help ppl" you mentioned in your attack on Anna Frodesiak), nor are we affiliated with them. "Wiki" is a type of software that lots of sites besides Wikipedia use.

And if the "New World Order" is real -- We'd be just another front for them. Ian.thomson (talk) 01:00, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

I have a copy
I am sorry it took days for you to write. But all is not lost! I can provide you with a copy if you like. Then you can save it to your computer.

Anyhow, I saw your post at my talk page. I was only doing my job. Please do not be upset. The best thing is for you to publish that at blogspot or wordpress or some other more appropriate place. This, as Ian.thomson kindly points out above, is an encyclopedia.

Best wishes, and let me know if you want a copy. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 01:03, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

The copy
It is temporarily here User:Pneikro/Sandbox. I will delete it in 24 hours. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 02:35, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Legal threats
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved. I just did a spot check and found "I will sue them..." at the restored userpage you wished to have a copy of.

Considering No legal threats and what you have so far contributed here, I have deleted that page again, blocked this account, and even removed access to this talk page. If you wish to be unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request at UTRS. Thank you, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 02:54, 29 April 2016 (UTC)