User talk:Pnkflufyunicorn

May 2016
Hello, I'm Altamel. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to List of prime numbers has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Altamel (talk) 19:35, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Pnkflufyunicorn


A tag has been placed on User:Pnkflufyunicorn, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. CAPTAIN RAJU ( ✉ ) 19:42, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Contested deletion
This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... (your reason here) --Pnkflufyunicorn (talk) 19:44, 23 May 2016 (UTC) i love the katana and enjoy the article and truthfull ness about this article

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of prime numbers with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Dcirovic (talk) 19:47, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

May 2016
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove speedy deletion notices from pages you created yourself, as you did at User:Pnkflufyunicorn, you may be blocked from editing. CAPTAIN RAJU ( ✉ ) 19:50, 23 May 2016 (UTC)


 * A user page is for an editor to give a little information about himself or herself in connection with his or her work for the encyclopaedia. It is not a sort of free web space for posting content unrelated to work for Wikipedia.
 * The content of your user page infringed copyright: you even stated yourself where you had copied it from. Your statement "this is not plagiarism" suggests that you may possibly be confusing copyright with plagiarism. Copying content from someone else is not plagiarism if you acknowledge where you copied it from, but it is still a copyright infringement unless the copyright holder has given permission for the copying.
 * For both those reasons, your user page has been deleted. Either one of them would have been sufficient grounds for deletion under Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 20:16, 23 May 2016 (UTC)