User talk:Pocahnontas

Welcome!

 * }

March 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Sofia Hayat has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OOx5ttoeRug. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 17:11, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

sofia hayat DOB
Sofia Hayat has said herself her birthday is in 84 as celebrated in the media, numerous papers have given her dob, however someone keeps refering to an old article which may be wrong, newspapers do not always print the right things and sofia herself has said it on the links that were provided hence taken off by someone. links provided to that effect more than 1 paper http://www.firstpost.com/topic/organization/facebook-sofia-hayat-poses-for-petas-new-campaign-on-her-28th-birthda-video-I4d1pJr7JeE-37423-1.html http://www.filmitown.com/2012/12/08/pics-sofia-hayat-special-bikini-photo-shoot-on-her-28th-birthday-for-peta/ http://www.photosheaf.com/pin/cd85cd239cfeda611792f2f37a2197cd135825 http://www.garvbollywood.com/sofia-hayat-celebrates-her-birthday-and-shows-her-love-for-animals-on-the-same-day/

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons. Thank you.

You must stop replacing the sourced birth year with a different unsourced year. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  04:48, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Sofia Hayat 29 year old.
She stated herself in a reality show on March 2013, she is 28 year old, also many daily newspapers indicated her as 28 year old in early 2013. I had updated her dob 29 year old as there are sources to prove her age. --- S mauritius '' diR mWa!! 08:37, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Sofia Hayat
In her book, page one, gives her birthdate as 1974. I see IMDB gives it as 1984. Confusing... Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 05:21, 13 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Bigg boss website sofia Hayat aged 28 when she entered the house..please check site — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pocahnontas (talk • contribs)
 * Bigg boss is not a source with a reputation for fact checking and accuracy.-- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  14:17, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

What about IMDB that is accurate..rather than tabloids
 * IMDB is not at all accurate - please see External links/Perennial websites, Citing IMDb, and WP:RS/IMDB. Also, when there are conflicting dates given and both dates are sourced, both dates are presented in the article in order to allow the reader to weigh the evidence.--Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 18:38, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Sofia Hayat, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  21:28, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

Have some responsibility as press ounces are using Wikipedia..also all,of her history and credits and links taken down. I will get you blocked if you continue your false prints.
 * Pocahnontas, nobody is going to block TheRedPenOfDoom for attempting to uphold Wikipedia's policies regarding sourcing in WP:BLPs. When multiple reliable sources report conflicting dates, the conflict is included in the article along with the sources. This allows the reader to review the material themselves. Your blanking of one sourced date that you do not agree with in preference of another is disruptive - please don't continue to remove it.--Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 19:51, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Sofia Hayat with this edit, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  20:58, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

Disruptive editing
I have tried to explain to you why your blanking of sourced content to revert to your preferred date is disruptive, yet it continues. I understand that you believe that there is only one correct date of birth, but Wikipedia reports what reliable sources say, and in this case there are multiple sources reporting conflicting dates, therefore we note the discrepancy in the reporting in the article. If you continue to edit-war to blank the sourced content without consensus, you will very likely find yourself blocked.--Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 21:34, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

Imdb..Is a reliable source, daily mail is just a tabloid paper..her public birthday celebration and over 1000 sites saying 84 I can send at least 100 links. Your source is 1. I understand this 1 source is good for you, but also recently ms Hayat filed a police complaint and her don on that said she's 29. Is tha not enough?
 * No, long-standing consensus is that IMDB is not a reliable source for BLPs (see for example External links/Perennial websites, Citing IMDb, and WP:RS/IMDB). The Daily Mail would, under normal circumstances, be a poor source; in this case however, the story is written by the subject herself and is therefore an acceptable self-published source. Police reports and other court documents cannot be used per WP:BLPPRIMARY. Again, Wikipedia reports what reliable sources say, we do not make independent decisions based on our own personal opinion as to which is the most accurate. --Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 16:57, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Sofia Hayat with this edit, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  19:07, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|alt=Stop icon]] This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Sofia Hayat with this edit you will be blocked. Sofia Hayat has a police statement with her national card showing 1984, we understand that you may have. A personal vendetta with sofia Hayat or you may be an employee of said ak father, but we will have you blocked for false information


 * You have not read any of the policies that have been linked for you, have you? -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  19:13, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 days for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:37, 31 December 2013 (UTC)