User talk:PocklingtonDan

Your GA nomination of Wade's Causeway
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Wade's Causeway you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of LT910001 -- 01:20, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
 * I look forward to working with you, and hope that you are interested in working with me to genuinely improve the article. I am happy to respond to constructive feedback and take on board any suggestions you may make. Here's hoping for a positive review process... -PocklingtonDan (talk) 06:49, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Wade's Causeway
The article Wade's Causeway you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Wade's Causeway for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of LT910001 -- 06:02, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Wade's Causeway, Tempest Anderson and YMT
Hi Dan, I'm glad you got nosy! I'd been keeping a very-impressed eye on Wade's Causeway for a while. I hadn't realised the Tempest Anderson connection! There'll be loads more photos of him coming from YMT soon. I'll have a look through the Wade's Causeway piece and ask around for resource's at YMT that might help improve it. Let me know if there's any specific references you need access to. It would also be great to have your skills on other material related to the project so if you have other interests you'd like me to help with let me know. I assume you've seen the project pages comments and ideas are also welcome there. PatHadley (talk) 18:04, 10 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Thanks Pat. I actually have a request in with YMT already to see if either they are able to have a shuffle through archives for any old material from 1910s-1920s relating to Wade's Causeway or whether I might be allowed public access to the archives if they are set up to allow this. I think my request it currently sat with Adam Parker in Collections but there's no particular rush. From memory any material would date right back to the founding of the museum so is probably going to be either uncatalogued or missing based on past experience :-) I also have an appointment lined up to visit the YAS office in Leeds too to have a dig through some of their old material.


 * Wade's Causeway is definitely the structure that has caught my imagination at the moment and I'll be working on it's article probably another month or so at least. But after that I'm certainly willing to work on any other YMT-related articles. I would be especially interested in articles relating to the early antiquarians etc. I'll have a lead through the YMT project pages.


 * Many thanks, -PocklingtonDan (talk) 07:37, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

Missing
You are now officially listed as missing. Should you ever return or if you prefer not to be listed, feel free to remove your name from the list. Chris Troutman ( talk ) 22:29, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

WikiProject Military history coordinator election
Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 22:15, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

WikiProject Military history coordinator election
Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 29 September. Yours, Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 05:22, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:28, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Sarah Bryant (author)


A tag has been placed on Sarah Bryant (author) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Sionk (talk) 00:10, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Roman Military History
Hello, due to your edits to Roman army, i would like to request that you join a small group ( i am the only active member) known as WikiProject Military history/Incubator/Roman military history, If you are willing to join, please do so. Iazyges (talk) 17:12, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Category:Ancient Roman generals has been nominated for discussion
Category:Ancient Roman generals, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Iazyges  Consermonor   Opus meum  12:03, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Timeline of Ancient Roman military campaigns
Template:Timeline of Ancient Roman military campaigns has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 19:31, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

User group for Military Historians
Greetings,

"Military history" is one of the most important subjects when speak of sum of all human knowledge. To support contributors interested in the area over various language Wikipedias, we intend to form a user group. It also provides a platform to share the best practices between military historians, and various military related projects on Wikipedias. An initial discussion was has been done between the coordinators and members of WikiProject Military History on English Wikipedia. Now this discussion has been taken to Meta-Wiki. Contributors intrested in the area of military history are requested to share their feedback and give suggestions at Talk:Discussion to incubate a user group for Wikipedia Military Historians.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:29, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Good article reassessment of Bruce Willis
Bruce Willis, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Mz7 (talk) 06:00, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Capture of Fidenae (435 BC)


A tag has been placed on Capture of Fidenae (435 BC), requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. (See section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Wikipedia has standards for the minimum necessary information to be included in short articles; you can see these at Wikipedia:Stub. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
 * It is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. (See section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Wikipedia has standards for the minimum necessary information to be included in short articles; you can see these at Wikipedia:Stub. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Chewings72 (talk) 04:22, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Rmn-mil-cmd-strct-3.png


The file File:Rmn-mil-cmd-strct-3.png has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unused (see WP:NOTWEBHOST), unclear purpose"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Zinclithium (talk) 06:14, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Rmn-mil-cmd-strct-1.png


The file File:Rmn-mil-cmd-strct-1.png has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unused (see WP:NOTWEBHOST), unclear purpose"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Zinclithium (talk) 06:21, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Amesbury School


The article Amesbury School has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non notable independent (fee paying) primary school. No in depth reliable sources, no claims of importance or significance. Article fails WP:GNG and WP:ORG."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 13:11, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Portal:Military of ancient Rome
Portal:Military of ancient Rome, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Military of ancient Rome and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Military of ancient Rome during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Mark Schierbecker (talk) 06:56, 27 August 2019 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Campaignbox Apocryphal Roman Wars
Template:Campaignbox Apocryphal Roman Wars has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. &thinsp;&mdash; Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)&thinsp; 23:24, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

FAR notice
I have nominated Structural history of the Roman military for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. RetiredDuke (talk) 20:59, 21 January 2021 (UTC)