User talk:Pocoyohasan8

April 2017
Hello, I'm Justeditingtoday. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Netflix have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Justeditingtoday (talk) 01:54, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

January 2018
Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of Little Einsteins episodes, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 19:23, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

April 2018
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to List of Little Einsteins episodes. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Please see WP:KIDSTVDATES. Sum mer PhD v2.0 00:43, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

June 2020
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Phineas and Ferb (season 1). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 18:29, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add inappropriate images, as you did at Candace Flynn, you may be blocked from editing. Geraldo Perez (talk) 21:51, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Candace Flynn. Overwrote an article with something else Geraldo Perez (talk) 18:46, 23 June 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours to prevent further vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. RickinBaltimore (talk) 19:35, 23 June 2020 (UTC)

 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.