User talk:Podgorski37

May 2017
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Melbourne City FC. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. &#42;*SEW** (talk) 11:47, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at North Melbourne Football Club, you may be blocked from editing. Flickerd (talk) 13:14, 2 May 2017 (UTC) You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 06:44, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

Help me! I've been blocked for my friend's stupid edits!
I've made a fair bit of constructives edits to wikipedia, Luke was logged in my account vandalising some AFL page and now you blocked me, sure if you look at my editing history the first couple were vandalism but then i began to made constructive edits. The most recent vandalism WASN'T ME and I would like to request an unblock please.

GOD DAMMIT, fine, you'll regret it. Oh, and Luke is my classmate.

Podgorski37 (talk) 02:28, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
 * You have 14 edits total to pages outside your userspace, and some percentage are vandalism, and you want to be unblocked because My little brother did it? No way you can ever prove this wasn't you; no reason to trust it wasn't you; with the basis being the oldest, uncheckable excuse in the book that, sure, could be true, and probably is about 1% of the time. In short, not going to happen, sorry.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 03:14, 8 June 2017 (UTC)