User talk:PoemKeeper

An Anarchist FAQ
Regarding your two changes to An Anarchist FAQ, the statement about Friedman as it was was accurate and sufficient to explain the controversy. This is not the soapbox for Friedman's views, nor is the point of the article to engage in a back-and-forth about them or to give them wider exposure, but to explain An Anarchist FAQ more carefully. As for the second, Friedman said, "they don't care whether what they publish is the truth", which is awfully close to saying they don't care about the truth, but rather than parse what difference you think there is, we can just quote Friedman's words directly. BTW, welcome to Wikipedia. Please read up on our policies, especially the need to discuss changes to articles, and be especially aware of things like WP:3RR which are extremely firm rules. I don't know where the official "welcome wagon" is, but I think they'll pop by soon as well to leave you a fuller note. Tb (talk) 20:25, 27 November 2009 (UTC)


 * I disagree with you. Friedman's main point is he is saying that they put material in the FAQ first, then wait for someone to tell them something is wrong, then correct it, instead of fact checking first. That's his point and that's what you're deleting. I hope you're aware of the 3RR too. PoemKeeper (talk) 21:42, 27 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Have you edited Wikipedia before? As for the content, I'd request you propose your change on the talk page.  You don't seem like an actual newbie, so I'll assume you know where that is, and hope you'll make public any other account you edit with. Tb (talk) 21:43, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes I have edited Wikipedia before. Who hasn't? PoemKeeper (talk) 21:45, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Under what account? Tb (talk) 22:04, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
 * No clue. That's why I made a new account. PoemKeeper (talk) 22:07, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The use of multiple accounts to edit Wikipedia is, except in very unusual circumstances, prohibited. It is incumbent upon you to be honest about this.  Tb (talk) 22:21, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

You have now reverted my edit three times on An Anarchist FAQ. Bear WP:3RR in mind. Tb (talk) 22:23, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Oh my! It looks like you have too! Or at least took part in what they called edit warring. What shall we do?? PoemKeeper (talk) 22:28, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
 * I have requested you to discuss your change, in accord with the bold-revert-discuss rule, and you have refused. We have both made three reverts, and we are both barred from any further reversion on An Anarchist FAQ for a day.  I'm reminding you of your obligations under that policy.  Tb (talk) 22:30, 27 November 2009 (UTC)