User talk:Poetic Decay/Archive 7

No personal attacks
Please stop. If you continue to make personal attacks on other people, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Thank you. --Zeno McDohl (talk) 00:13, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
 * It would be helpful to know where or even when I made said personal attack, because I'm kinda lost as to what I did. // Decaimiento  Poético  02:26, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
 * This edit summary. Telling someone to get a life isn't exactly a compliment and it does no good to the community. --Zeno McDohl (talk) 03:03, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Oh, I see now. Well, I suppose I could watch out for edit summaries like that in the future. Thanks for letting me know. // Decaimiento  Poético  03:08, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

Son Goku Article
On the Goku article, you make the edit where you changed Kakarot and Kakarrot to Kakarotto. Anime and Manga names are what names the use in the english versions of the anime and manga respectively. I changed them back to what they're suppose to be. Ryu Ematsu
 * I never made such an edit, not recently anyway. The most recent edit I made to that article was italicizing Dragon Ball and Dragon Ball Z, and spliting a paragraph. // Decaimiento  Poético  18:52, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
 * I check the history and it came back to you. Before that, someone vandilized the page. So... yeah. ^^;; Ryu Ematsu

lol
hey, ur Black Cat (manga) artikle on wikiquote on the first sentince is typed Black Cat. you better fix it and put a on the externel links. go see for yuself. lol, would i lie? A Link to tha Past
 * Possibly. And if you spend some much time on Wikiquote, why don't you do it yourself? This is the last request I take from you about Wikiquote. // Decaimiento  Poético  22:08, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

Long time no see, new name for me
Hey, it's me! Atomic Religione, is now Fonzie77!!!Nice to see you are still doing your best, even at the Tenkaichi 3 article, where the "crazies" tend to hang out....you know who i'm talking about. well hope to keep seeing you here! --User:Fonzie77

User: Naruto134
Hey, could you keep watch over this guy? Make sure that if he does anything uncivil to make him aware of it. I would do it but i'm going to be out of town next week. Thanks. --User:Fonzie77
 * Of course. I tend to watch the users I warn for a while afterwards anyway, so I'm sure adding another to the list couldn't hurt. Have fun on your trip. ^^ // Decaimiento  Poético  02:00, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

Naruto video games
As you seem to be one of the more involved editors, could you check out my proposal on the list talk page? TTN 18:42, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
 * I'd be glad to. I'll check it out as soon as I can. // Decaimiento  Poético  00:29, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Naruto Heroes and Portable
I hope you don't mind me bringing this up here, but how do you know for sure that Heroes and Portable are completely new games? The spokesperson for Bandai America is lying about the whole thing, if you know what I mean. Here's my observations on the whole thing:

-Notice the screenshots on Siliconera? They are in Japanese. The spokesperson says that the game is being made in Japanese, whcih explains why the game is not in English. That is a false statement, and I am very surprised they would say such a thing. For one, they do not need to make it in Japanese first if it is a game being made for America. They would make it in English! Elite Beat Agents is made in Japan, yet it was never developed in Japanese. This points to Heroes being Portable.

-The "new" tag-team system is not "new". This battle system is used in Portable's story mode. This is why they are keeping quiet about the Japanese story mode and not posting pictures of it. This is another part of the marketing ploy to somehow make it look like the game is "new".

-The menus are the same! I have some pictures if you would like to see them.

-The story mode is getting the axe to make the game have more of the "battle anytime, anywhere" aspect which is mentioned in the trailer.

Once when the game comes out, I'm sure Siliconera will be having an article on this whole thing. I mean, can't you see through this marketing ploy at work? I don't know anyone that believes it. Hopefully, you and I can get the word out about this once I can get more info when the game is actually released. I was the one that exposed the Uzumaki Ninden edits, so don't be surprised if I pull this off. ;)

Once again, I have some comparison shots, and I can post them if you would like to see them.Kylemcauliffe15 01:17, 1 July 2007 (UTC)Kylemcauliffe15
 * You can hold onto those for a second. Please see the discussion here to understand why, if you haven't already seen it. // Decaimiento  Poético  01:29, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

So, should I post them there? Or wait until you have all of the games switched over? I don't mean to sound clueless, I just don't really know what you are doing at the moment. (aside from moving the games onto one page)Kylemcauliffe15 15:11, 1 July 2007 (UTC)Kylemcauliffe15

Tenkaichi 3
Hey man, it's just my opinion but deleting that guys comments and dubbing it a chat was sorta unnessecary. next time just leave it, and if it escalates to something like a chatroom, delete it. just an opinion, later dude. --ÄtΘmic R€£igione sїgñ

Admin
I think you should try to become an admin. You have 9'000 edits, and are a trusted member of wikipedia. Just a suggestion. --User:Atomic Religione
 * I agree. However, you might want to remove your userbox about that. People might think you're more concerned with status than the project. You might want to go on Coaching.  J- stan  Talk 20:33, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Adminship is... serious. I may say that I want to become one right away and think I'm truly ready for it after a year's time on Wikipedia, but I don't want to get in over my head. I'll check out the coaching, and I'll consider the possibility of accepting an RfA or filling out my own.
 * Also, I'm just 20 edits away from 11000 right now. Just thought you guys would like to know. ^^ // Decaimiento  Poético  20:46, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

So have you looked into the coaching? Just to let you know that if you do try to become an admin you'll have my support the whole way. --User:Atomic Religione

Please contact me
My MSN messenger name is bulletproof3_16@hotmail.com. Please contact me as soon as possible. -- bullet  proof  3:16 17:04, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Not to worry. I will contact you shortly then. -- bullet  proof  3:16 17:52, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Release Date
I have the release date for Tenkaichi 3 its 11/15/07 Kyuubi29 12:24, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Comments on heading links
There's a new guideline about it, read it here. The bot is right. -- Ynhockey (Talk) 15:21, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I see, my bad then. I'll keep that in mind next time. // Decaimiento  Poético  15:25, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Re: Naruto game series talk pages
Ignoring them would be best. Removing their comments wouldn't be advised unless they're being insulting, such as abandoning a liberal combination of the words "fuck" and "you". They'll lose interest eventually; they always do. ~SnapperTo 15:44, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Hi.
I just added Yakon ... Not Pui pui ... But at Atari forums there is also some hints that Yakon will be a playable character ... But i won't add Yakon any more ... I mean I just added Yakon one or two times ... Not Pui Pui SSJ 5 17:12, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Tenkaichi 3 Piccolo
What's the difference between Piccolo (Early) and Piccolo (Mid)? Ryu
 * I'm not entirely sure as of now, but my quess would be Early Piccolo is from the end of DB to the end of the Saiyan Saga, Mid Piccolo is from the Andriod Saga to the end of the Cell Saga, and each have different attacks. // Decaimiento  Poético  17:24, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

"Nova Shenron"
I looked it up and it is indeed not Nova Shenron. It wasn't Nouva Shenron either. It's Nuova. Like I said, check the official FUNimation website. It'll be there. Ryu

Clash of Ninja
As you were the one that made the character chart, and likely have the most experience with these games, could you add references to the character chart? It's likely going to become a sticking point in a GA review, and rather than remove it altogether, adding references to confirm the characters' presence would be preferable. Sourcing the game guide, instruction manual, or any other verifiable source would be fine. Furthermore, is the gameplay section simply going to be a "general gameplay features" section, with additional features being listed under each individual game section, or should it encompass the entire series? I would prefer the former, but I'm open to opinions. Thanks.  Sephiroth BCR ( Converse ) 03:44, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I'd be glad to cite the characters' appearances, though I've been debating over how it should be done. I've considered the following options:


 * 1) Citing each characters' appearance by using next to their names; or
 * 2) Using a "Sources" section, akin to the ones we have on Naruto character articles, listing both manuals and strategy guides. This option seems to be shorter, simpler, and more accurate as instruction manuals don't list all playable characters.
 * As for the gameplay information, I agree with you on using the former. // Decaimiento  Poético  17:02, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The problem with the second section is that we still need inline citations. Although adding the sources is indeed good, a GA reviewer is still going to want inline citations citing the specific page in the instruction manual, strategy guide, or whatever. If this was a single game, we could list a single source reference for the entire table, but as we're dealing with multiple games, this can't be done.
 * On the topic of the gameplay information, I would appreciate it the relevant information could be added. Copy editing can fix everything, but the information just needs to be out there. Another issue, however, is our relative inability to provide sources for gameplay or reception for the Japanese exclusive games. I suppose we could gloss over them, as it isn't absolutely necessary for a GA review, but it would be nice.  Sephiroth BCR ( Converse ) 17:32, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

User:Wik293
Since the last warning you gave him he has still been editing the Tenkaichi 3 article then deleting his vandalism right after. I'm not sure if this counts if he reverts it but I would like to ask why he isnt blocked yet. Atomic Religione 19:34, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
 * To be honest, I don't really know why he hasn't been either. Around the time he got his final warning from me, he was clearly vandalizing and seemed to be aware of it, so I reported him. Now he just seems to be toying with us, if he's doing as you described. He should be reported again. // Decaimiento  Poético  20:38, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

Speak of the devil, a temp block has been placed on him, for the best. --User:Atomic Religione

He's vandalising the Tenkaichi 3 page right now. I just reverted a bunch of his bull****.Tetra Vega 20:30, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

User:Wik656, I SMELL A SOCK. Ugh. --User:Atomic Religione
 * He's been reported. ^^ // Decaimiento  Poético  00:24, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

Gracias compadre. --User:Atomic Religione

Hentai
Thanks for confirming for me that some editors do indeed take the maintenance tags seriously (and interpret them correctly), as you clearly do... Valrith 21:10, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Think nothing of it. I only wish I could help, though; all I know about hentai is that I like it. ^^ // Decaimiento  Poético  22:17, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

I speak for most (if not all men), by seconding Poetic's reply. --User:Atomic Religione

Kid Krillin
there is a picture of kid goku and kid krillin in ign and everywhere for DBZ BT3 if he was confirmed why isnt he in the new characters list?
 * If you're refering to this image, that's not Kid Krillin. Look closer. // Decaimiento  Poético  01:30, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

Sorry
I was cleaning out user pages and someone must have added a redirect for some reason and I didn't notice when I blanked it out.

Close...
Naruto: Clash of Ninja (series) is really close to GA status. Sources for the gameplay (the section as well as the individual game sections) would allow us to send it to WP:GAC. References for the table would be nice, but it's not absolutely required. If we have a strict GA reviewer, it may become an issue, but we should be fine. As for the gameplay, citing the reviews (as in the GameSpot, IGN, etc. review) is an accepted practice, and applicable. Most of the information would require a cite directly from a guidebook, the relevant information book, or another verifiable source. Thanks.  Sephiroth BCR ( Converse ) 00:03, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
 * I'll do what I can to help. I'm sure we'll reach GA (possibly even FA, though perhaps I'm setting my sights too high) soon enough. ^.~ Also, before I do anything, is the instruction manual an acceptable source for references? // Decaimiento  Poético  00:09, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
 * FA will be hard. We'll actually have to hire someone to skim Japanese websites for sources and information. It's feasible though. The WP:VG folks are really good at this in any case. And as to your question, yes, the instruction manual is an acceptable source for references. The only issue that people have with it is that sometimes it is used for information that drifts too far into game guide territory, but that's not an issue in our case. Thanks again.  Sephiroth BCR ( Converse ) 00:12, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Oh, and for how to cite it, see Final Fantasy XII.  Sephiroth BCR ( Converse ) 00:16, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Japan taskforces
In order to encourage more participation, and to help people find a specific area in which they are more able to help out, we have organized taskforces at WikiProject Japan. Please visit the Participants page and update the list with the taskforces in which you wish to participate. Links to all the taskforces are found at the top of the list of participants.

Please let me know if you have any questions, and thank you for helping out! ··· 日本穣 ? · Talk to Nihonjoe 01:35, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

WP:CVU status
The Counter-Vandalism Unit project is under consideration to be moved to and/or  status. Another proposal is to delete or redirect the project. You have been identified as a project member and your input as to this matter would be welcomed at WT:CVU and at the deletion debate. Thank you! Delivered on behalf of xaosflux 17:30, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

Im back
Hey Pal Im back! How have ya been? have a quick question, I was looking at the DBZ:BT3 page and found that it had all of the characters of Tenkaichi 2, was this anounced or is it just speculation? Tell me so I know to delete it or not. DBZROCKS Its over 9000!!! 22:59, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Holy hell, long time no see! Hope you've been doing well. Anyway, IGN has stated that the game will "[feature] an absolutely massive roster of more than 150 characters, including each of the 120 found in Budokai Tenkaichi 2". Contradicting as it may be, seeing we had about 130 in Tenkaichi 2 and not 120, we have yet to hear any news on characters being removed. // Decaimiento  Poético  16:35, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

Exequias
Please tell me the reason why the Unnamed Exequias Leader shoudn't be removed, we can't rev each other for long, you know Hartebeest 15:58, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

Too many articles in Bleach
Hey, you might have notice to long discussion in Talk:List of Bleach characters. Do you think its time to merge the stub articles? I also created a test page here to see how the List of Bleach shinigami would look like.-- Hana ichi  03:25, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

Hey dude didn't like the image?
Did you not like the image i added on orihime's page? Optimous (talk 12:38, 13 August 2007 (UTC)).
 * In a sense. I didn't like the fact it was up for speedy deletion, if that's what you're asking. It has no license, source, nor fair use rationale; all images need these things to avoid being deleted. // Decaimiento  Poético  19:40, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
 * O yeah sorry I fixed it I think. Sorry still new at uploading images i usually don't. Optimous (talk 13:05, 13 August 2007 (UTC)).

Wiks Newest Sock
User:Wik989, is another obvious sock. Report him to the admin you reported the other one to. Thanks ;) --User:Atomic Religione
 * Already done. ^.~ He's been indefinately blocked. I wonder when he'll finally take a hint. // Decaimiento  Poético  00:20, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

Two matters
Dear, you are invited to join the move request for Goku since it's been much slower than expected. I also asked something at WP:WPDB and thought you could help in seeking the answer. Much thanks, Lord Sesshomaru 00:32, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

A thought
Seeing articles such as List of Final Fantasy media and List of F-Zero titles, it would be possible to have List of Naruto video games have a similar format, as it would be easier to have it achieve Featured List status in a manner similar to the aforementioned games. The only problem is how to remove the individual game articles that do not fall into any single series. I suppose we could make series articles for all those who do have series, which would be better than having individual articles, and it still would be possible (and perhaps easier) to get them to GA status. Given that we originally had them in individual articles, combining them into a series article is still a superior result. The problem is the individual game articles. If you have a possible idea, then we could move forward with this. Much appreciated.  Sephiroth BCR ( Converse ) 02:27, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
 * See my sandbox for an initial draft.  Sephiroth BCR ( Converse ) 04:38, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

List of characters in Bleach
Next time, don't revert. Edit it. There was some information that you erased doing that. - 200.209.169.81 00:35, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
 * May I ask what you're refering to? I've been busy with several things today, a Bleach "project" for Wikipedia being one of them, and I can't recall any edits you might be talking about. // Decaimiento  Poético  00:41, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

Series articles
I guess Template:Infobox VG Hidden might be helpful on some of the combined series articles to help stop some of the complaints, and give more information if you feel like using it. TTN 00:39, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Wow, I never knew we had something like that for video games. I'll go see how it looks on the series pages and just hope it'll stick. // Decaimiento  Poético  15:50, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

Re:Games
Sorry for not responding quickly, I've been busy on my college tour. Making similar lists for those articles is fine. As for character lists for the single games, it becomes more game guide information than showing the transition between games in a series. The only mention that I would include is that they are based on the Bleach/Dragon Ball/Naruto/whatever series and leave it at that. For series, you can include out-of-universe sources concerning inclusion or exclusion of certain characters and so on and such forth. In any case, have you thought of a solution for separating single games?  Sephiroth BCR ( Converse ) 05:11, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Don't worry about it; we had a pretty bad storm last night that didn't die down until maybe four or five in the morning and I had to take an early break (somewhere between 7:30 to 8 at night). At any rate, I'll avoid adding character lists and focus more on encyclopedic information. For the single games, however... I haven't come up with anything. But I'll keep looking around for ideas and hopefully we can finally get all these articles to GA. // Decaimiento  Poético  15:50, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

Hacked
My computer has been hacked by someone that i think is from 4 of these websites that i go to. could you please find out who it is and tell me.Kyuubi29 13:33, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm not the right person to go to for such a thing. I've had no experience in this field, and the only advice I can give is to change your password and report this incident either to an administrator or bring it to the village pump. // Decaimiento  Poético  15:50, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

BT3: Desert Bandit Yamcha
How come DB Yamcha was removed? Was he proven to be an alt. costume? DB Yamcha, and Z Yamcha hve different Hud portraits, and blast stock limits: http://img251.imageshack.us/img251/718/yamchadbup5.jpgTetra Vega 22:47, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, I just found the topic on the discussion page. I guess this isn't needed here.Tetra Vega 08:38, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

General BT3 discussion
Shouldn't new tenkaichi Charecters be on a seperate list like on the other lists? DBZROCKS Its over 9000!!! 12:19, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
 * I suppose I can try and set up the character list so new characters are referred to as such. I'll go see what I can do now. // Decaimiento  Poético  14:49, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Hello again pal, I was thinking and thought that listing the trasformations instead of just putting them in parenthaees makes the list (of Charecters) harder to read and more bloated. Also I noticed that that isn't what the other Budokai pages are doing, should we change it back? DBZROCKS Its over 9000!!! 21:11, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry. I've been trying to find new ways of listing the characters so we can cite them without the table looking horrible (to avoid all unnecessary complaints from other users), but the roster's sheer size makes it almost impossible to do so. I'll keep experimenting, and hopefully I'll find a great way to handle this soon. // Decaimiento  Poético  02:34, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

Bleach Wii and Bleach GC
I will have to go to the store and write down the NP info so I can relay it to you. If you go to the official Bleach Wii website, it has a box with all of the GC characters, and underneath, it shows a new character box for characters introduced in Wii. They are sequels, just without numbers or anything to denote them being sequels. Kind of like the sequel to Jurassic Park, it is called the Lost World. There is nothing there to denote that it is a sequel, it is just known that it is. ;) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Kylemcauliffe15 (talk • contribs).
 * Thanks, Kyle. I'll check it out. :) // Decaimiento  Poético  17:01, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

E-mail
I've sent you an E-mail. Acalamari 20:51, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
 * I've replied. :) // Decaimiento  Poético  01:51, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

Your nomination
 Acalamari would like to nominate you to become an administrator. Please visit Requests for adminship to see what this process entails, and then contact Acalamari to accept or decline the nomination. A page has been created for your nomination at Requests for adminship/. If you accept the nomination, you must formally state and sign your acceptance and answer the questions on that page. Once you have answered the questions, you may post your nomination for discussion, or request that your nominator do so. All you need to do is give good answers to the questions, accept the nomination, and then transclude the RfA onto Requests for adminship. :) Acalamari 18:57, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
 * That's excellent; just follow my instructions! :) Acalamari 19:23, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

You can do it Poetic, if you choose to accept, you've got my full support. Atomic Religione 19:07, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Hurray! I wish you the best my friend! -- bullet  proof  3:16 20:16, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I appreciate the support, but after only a few minutes, it's not looking too good... // Decaimiento  Poético  20:17, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Meh, its just constructive criticism. Whatever the outcome may end up being, I guarantee you'll come out stronger and wiser.-- bullet  proof  3:16 20:20, 23 August 2007 (UTC)


 * I strongly suggest that you improve upon question 1. Whatever you do though, don't reword your original answer. Instead, write an expanded answer underneath your original answer to question 1. If you don't add an expanded answer to question 1, you'll likely receieve more and stronger opposition. Seriously, you should improve it. Acalamari 20:25, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Seriously, try to improve that first answer. What can an admin do other than stopping vandals? Really, is that the only thing admins do around here? Talk about what you'll do with AfDs or RfDs or other stuff like problems on the admin noticeboard. Try to really get into detail with what actions you'll take. -- bullet  proof  3:16 20:31, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry, everyone. I guess I'm just nervous and even kinda scared. Is that natural? Man, I hope it is... At first, I was so excited; now I'm questioning myself on whether I'm ready or not. // Decaimiento  Poético  20:40, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Its natural, don't worry, Im with you all the way! DBZROCKS   Its over 9000!!!  20:43, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
 * I'd say it’s quite natural to feel this way when an opportunity like this comes at you. Relax and really think before you answer to questions and comments. Show that you are responsible and really listening to what others say. Take their advice into consideration. Again, it would really help you if you would expand your first answer and talk about what I said in my comment above. -- bullet  proof  3:16 20:47, 23 August 2007 (UTC)


 * It is quite natural. PD, I don't think you're suited to be an admin and said as much in your RfA. But, if it fails don't take it hard. Being an admin isn't some lofty status symbol or anything. I voluntarily gave up my admin bit months ago, and I think it's the best decision I ever made on Wikipedia. Whatever the outcome, learn from the experience. In the meantime, stop stressing about it :) It really doesn't matter two grains of sand what happens to the RfA. --Durin 20:50, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Thank, Durin. After having reviewed my edits and edit summaries myself, I honestly don't think I'm ready either. I want to give it a day or two longer for a chance of reassurance, but I don't think that'll happen. Also, I'm taking an oath right now to change my ways: no more biting, more discussing, and the like. *sighs* Oh well, there's always next year. // Decaimiento  Poético  20:57, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
 * It doesn't even have to be a full year before you are nominated again. Learn from this and improve yourself like you just said and there's no doubt in my mind you'll be ready in no time. You are a great editor that I respect very much. Just kick back and relax here. What can you lose? On the contrary, you have much to gain. -- bullet  proof  3:16 21:01, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

Very true bulletproof, well said. Atomic Religione 21:07, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Sadly, I actually suggest you withdraw now; believe me, it's unlikely to get any better. Acalamari 22:08, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
 * I was seriously considering it. I don't need to become an admin; I'm happy where I am now. What do I need to do? // Decaimiento  Poético  22:10, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
 * I belive that the deciding factor was the Biting of vandals, without that I do belive you would have at least had better results. I think that a month or two of avoiding that will probably make your chances higher. Anyway I still think you would make a good admin. DBZROCKS   Its over 9000!!!  22:14, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Strike out your acceptance, and write after it why you are withdrawing. I will close the nomination down when you have done that (unless someone beats me to it). Acalamari 22:12, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

Your RfA
I've just closed your RfA, as you withdrew. I'm sorry I put you through that; I feel terrible at the moment. I am sure that if you listen to what most of opposition and Durin said, you should pass in four or five months time. Good luck. Acalamari 23:29, 23 August 2007 (UTC)


 * I'm very sorry about your RfA, if you need anything, please email me. Please don't be discouraged, this is a great opportunity for you to improve yourself as an editor. Good luck! Cheers, Ne ra n e i   (talk) 23:30, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

You handled it like a man, and for that I give you a firm manly handshake, (Givs firm handshake).You did good man...(starts crying)..I promised I wouldnt cry.... Atomic Religione 23:39, 23 August 2007 (UTC)


 * You did handle it good. Try again soon when you have more experience, and I probalay will support. Politics rule 23:40, 23 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Acalamari, please don't feel bad. If anything, I should feel ashamed for allowing you to nominate me in the first place. ^^ You must be so embarrassed my RfA was a flop. Thank you, though. You gave me hope, and despite the short time my RfA was open, I now know a few of my flaws and what I need to do to fix them. And Neranei, I have to thank you as well. Your comment was, though labelled neutral, very supportive and heartwarming. Atomic, PR... Hell, I just want to thank you all even though things didn't work out. I know I'm close, and I know I can make it in just a few more months' time. When that day comes, I'll be loking forward to all of your supports and opposes. Thanks again, everybody. ^^ // Decaimiento  Poético  23:51, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

It's all right, Decay. Running in RFA can be pretty hard. Just continue to contribute well and watch admin-related pages, and you'll do better when we nominate you again. Don't take it too hard on yourself.  bibliomaniac 1 5  Prepare to be deleted! 03:00, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

RE:Tenkaichi 3
There was no comfusion at all. It's not something I have a strong oppinion on. I just thought it should be like that because of the Tenkaichi 1 article. Hope this didn't cause any inconsistencies for you. Ryu-chan 19:13, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
 * I fixed the Tenkaichi article, and it's no problem really. You were just being bold. I'm just glad to see we worked things out without heads flying. ^^ // Decaimiento  Poético  19:18, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Yeah. I readded Goku (Mid) back to the bottom. ^^ Ryu-chan 19:20, 24 August 2007 (UTC)