User talk:Poeticbent/Archive 14

A Barnstar for you!

 * Thank you, . Please take a quick glance at Category:Missing person cases in Canada which was the basis for me to select that particular title. Apparently, the phrase "Disappearance of" is well featured there. My point is, contrary to Article titles policy guideline the article (as it stands) says absolutely nothing about her life in general and therefore can easily be misunderstood as insufficiently written.
 * 1) Disappearance of Julie Surprenant
 * 2) Disappearance of Emma Fillipoff
 * 3) Disappearance of Nathan O'Brien, Kathryn Liknes and Alvin Liknes
 * 4) Disappearance of Cédrika Provencher
 * If you don't mind, I actually prefer the original title, unless you can convince me otherwise. Thanks for your consideration,  Poeticbent  talk 04:51, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Sure. Feel free to technical request a move back, or I'll do it when I get back from dinner. It has the WikiProject Biogrophy banner, which is why I though it was meant to be a biography. In any case, fantastic article.  InsertCleverPhraseHere  04:59, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Thank you again. You're a great guy, .  Poeticbent  talk 05:08, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

Sambor Ghetto
Hi, I want to promote this with the image, but I'd like to confirm who's who in the picture first. According to the Yad Vashem site, it sometimes seems Alojzy is the black-haired one, and sometimes that he's the short, blondish one. Are you able to confirm who's who? Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 23:16, 10 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Hi, . I would love to get it right. Please help me confirm what Yad Vashem says. First, please take a look at the single photograph of Alojzy from before the war at "Alojzy Plewa" Image 14 of 25, third row of photographs below article, second thumbnail. Alojzy has a distinctly broad forehead with the slicked back hairstyle. Now, please compare that with (direct quote, no particular order) "Feliks and Alojzy Plewa with Ruth Schwarz (rescued), 1942" Image 16 of 25 (the same third row of thumbnails, fourth from left). This is the same man. His brother has completely different wavy hairstyle. Finally, in the third photo from the Gallery (last in the third row of thumbs) Alojzy is with other family members but without his brother: Image 17 of 25, looking exactly the same as in the photograph with Ruth ... wearing the same, easily-recognizable suit.
 * Here is a second, independent source: Portrait of Alojzy Plewa at the Polish Righteous webpage. Alojzy is older here, but the resemblance is equally striking.  Poeticbent  talk 00:22, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes, I see you're right. He has a distinctively wide, curvy hairline in all the pictures. So in Image 16 of 25, Yad Vashem, being a Hebrew-speaking site, is identifying "Feliks and Alojzy Plewa" right to left, without saying so. I'll revert my changes on the picture captions. Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 00:28, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Thank you, . Pleasure working with you, as always. Also here, Alojzy is with family but without his brother: at Yad Vashem archives.  Poeticbent  talk 00:34, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes, I saw that. Thanks. Yoninah (talk) 00:38, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

Post war FRG
You may find this of interest --Woogie10w (talk) 10:25, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Thank you for sharing, . The ramifications of these new revelations about the postwar history of NSDAP membership in West Germany would be very hard to underestimate.
 * I wonder if we could find a proper place in Wikipedia to include this information somehow. Please keep me posted,  Poeticbent  talk  14:49, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
 * I wonder if we could find a proper place in Wikipedia to include this information somehow. Please keep me posted,  Poeticbent  talk  14:49, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Sambor Ghetto
Gatoclass (talk) 00:01, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

Great job!
I don't do the barnstar thingies but that's a great job on the Sambor Ghetto article! Volunteer Marek (talk) 18:53, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks!  Poeticbent  talk 21:45, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

WP:DENY
Hello, it appears that this same user created a similar thread related to accusations of fascism on the Poland talk page, as with the History of Poland (1939–45). I'm not familiar with this process, but can the WP:DENY option be utilized here as well? --E-960 (talk) 17:28, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Sure. Just delete it, with edit summary WP:DENY. That's all it takes really to deny recognition to vandals who use talkpages for their racist and hate-ridden WP:SOAP. Thanks,  Poeticbent  talk 17:51, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

SS-Truppenübungsplatz Heidelager
Hi Poeticbent,

Here's one site I found which shows the changes of name of the camp in Pustków, Poland. Apparently, in planning, it had been given the name of "Ostpolen" as an SS military training centre from 21 December 1939 to 26 June 1940. With the beginning of the actual construction of the site on June 26, 1940, it was renamed SS "Dębica". From 15 March 1943, the site was designated as an SS military training centre "Heidelager". I've also seen this information in other sources. Best regards -- Marek . 69   talk   15:07, 5 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Hi . Please take a look at the distance between those two settlements in Google maps. From Debica to Pustków, Poland, is only a 16 minute drive by car. Waffen-SS Debica (as well as Ostpolen) can be mentioned in bodytext, but usually, it is the last official name of the camp, i.e. "Heidelager" which permeates the books of history. Cheers,  Poeticbent  talk 15:39, 5 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Poeticbent, I only mentioned it because on the Pustków talk page you were querying why I had used that name. I'd basically just copied from one of the sources. I am aware that it is some distance from Dębica, as I visited in August 2016. A very interesting museum. Best -- Marek . 69   talk   15:59, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Sounds fair. Thanks for mentioning this,  Poeticbent  talk 16:12, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

Merry Christmas

 * Thank you very much, . Same to you! Merry Christmas and a very Happy New Year!!  Poeticbent  talk 23:59, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
 * You're very welcome and thanks so much :) – Davey 2010 Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 00:16, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

Yo Ho Ho


Iryna Harpy (talk) is wishing you Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's Solstice or Christmas, Diwali, Hogmanay, Hanukkah, Lenaia, Festivus or even the Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding to your friends' talk pages.


 * Thank you, . Seasons Greetings!  Poeticbent  talk 13:19, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

Christmas gift, anyone?
The newly released add-on called "Adblock Plus 2.8.2" blocks all annoying banners and ads (which tend to overwhelm informative content of many external links in our Wikipedia articles), and supports websites by not blocking unobtrusive ads by default (configurable; meaning: you can turn it off anytime). The goal is to support websites which use non-intrusive ways to advertise, and to encourage more websites to do the same. Version 2.8.2 released November 22, 2016 (1.0 MiB) works with Firefox for Android 38.0, Firefox 38.0 and later, SeaMonkey 2.35 and later, Thunderbird 38.0 and later. This is a really good reason to switch to Firefox if you haven't done that yet. Enjoy!  Poeticbent  talk 17:27, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Forensic Approaches to Buried Remains by Caroline Sturdy Colls at al.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Forensic Approaches to Buried Remains by Caroline Sturdy Colls at al.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 06:31, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

Non-free images
Hi Poeticbent. I've noticed that you've uploaded a number of images that do not meet the WP:Non-free content guideline. The specific reason is that they are book covers used in articles about authors without significant commentary on book. See WP:NFCI #1, and the footnote. To avoid spamming your talk page, I will continue going through a bot-generated list of possible non-free content guideline violations, but I will not send you any additional notifications. If you have any questions, I would be happy to answer them. Please reply back here if you do. Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 06:42, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

I'd also like to clarify that I am checking each article to make sure that there is no significant commentary, and leaving alone all files that could be in the public domain, either due to age or simplicity. Sorry for the inconvenience! Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 07:07, 29 December 2016 (UTC)


 * — I suggest that you stop immediately. It looks like you went ahead with this plan in a semi-automatic way tagging different files mere seconds from each other, which is a proof that you do not even look at the articles in question and therefore perpetuate a falsity in your cookie-cutter summaries. You are not the first editor taking a stab at it. The only difference is that you do this with far less care and reflection than others. Our policy/guideline WP:NFCI for images specifically allows the book covers, to illustrate the article on the person (NFCI#1), when the cover art implicitly satisfies the "contextual significance" NFCC criterion (NFCC#8), in the article about the author per NFCC because the book itself is discussed within the article. For historical information, see RfC Jan 2011, RfC Sep 2012, and RfC Dec 2012. I will not be elaborating on this in here any further because your sweeping attack is already good enough for AN/I. Thank you,  Poeticbent  talk 07:27, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Hi there. I apologize if you've taken this the wrong way. However, NFCI#1 states: "NFCI#1 relates to the use of cover art within articles whose main subject is the work associated with the cover. Within such articles, the cover art implicitly satisfies the "contextual significance" NFCC criterion (NFCC#8) by virtue of the marketing, branding, and identification information that the cover conveys. The same rationale does not usually apply when the work is described in other articles, such as articles about the author or musician; in such articles, the NFCC criteria typically require that the cover art itself be significantly discussed within the article." I also did not tag about 25% to 50% of the images, due to the previously mentioned reasons. Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 07:30, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Again, if you have any questions, please ask. I'd also like to note that I tagged them with Di-disputed fair use rationale to allow for a 7 day grace period, in case you wished to write significant commentary about them. Unfortunately, since you tagged all the book covers with a fair use tag for pictures of people, they were eligible for deletion immediately, without the grace period, under WP:F7. However, I did not feel that was the best option. Take care, Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 08:47, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
 * I'm looking now at your editing pattern to make sense of what you do, because I find your nominations of my uploads to be completely unreasonable. The books illustrated hereafter are the sole reason why these academics do have Wikipedia biographies to begin with. I noticed, you're the kind of guy who likes WP:SHOUTING therefore I need to carefully consider the proper course of actions. A report to AN/I is absolutely necessary, but a discussion at Non-free content would probably have to follow. I need to make sure not to trigger a knee-jerk reaction from you because you seem to be on a mission. I shall begin with removing the cookie-cutter  templates because they have been placed there in a semi-automated manner without reading the actual articles. I will also be placing comments on the file talk page. The template guidelines specifically allow for that. I'm planning of writing an AN/I report next, so please bear with me. Thanks,  Poeticbent  talk  16:07, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
 * As I said before, I have read the articles. Do you have a specific dispute? Also, getting upset doesn't help anybody. Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 18:11, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
 * I see that you are going through and removing the templates. That is fine, but you have not addressed the concerns. On the file talk page, you link to Non-free_content, which requires one of two things. "where the item is itself the subject of sourced commentary in the article, or "where only by including such non-free content, can the reader identify an object, style, or behavior, that is a subject of discussion in the article." The books are neither the subject of soured commentary, nor the subject of discussion. Since you have not succesfully addressed this concern, as required to remove the template, I will discuss all the files at FFD. Take care, Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 18:20, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
 * — I sort of knew this was coming because you don't sound like a reasonable guy to me. However, just because you disagree with me does not mean that I did not discuss the matter with you. Like I said, I do not expect to reach any form of consensus with you in this matter, for all the above reasons.  Poeticbent  <span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-size:7.0pt;font-weight:bold;background:#FF88AF;border:1px solid #DF2929;padding:0.0em 0.2em;">talk 18:30, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
 * I have also replied at Files_for_discussion/2016_December_29. Contrary to your allegation there, I did read each article, and the existence of that nomination shows that. Again, if you have a specific reason why any tagged file is incorrectly tagged, please let me know. Thanks, Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 18:31, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
 * — Thank you for withdrawing your nomination. Perhaps I should explain what I do here in Wikipedia, which might not come through as obvious to you. I write bios of historians whose books (which I like to illustrate also), have been referenced in Wikipedia hundreds of times. I read, write, and edit articles about the history of World War II and the Holocaust. When I see a red link, with numerous citations throughout the project, I click on them and start articles in order to provide information for the benefit of our readers. I do not upload book covers indiscriminately. I choose them on their merits once I realize that they have already reached an iconic value, like with Christopher Browning for example. Thank you,  Poeticbent  <span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-size:7.0pt;font-weight:bold;background:#FF88AF;border:1px solid #DF2929;padding:0.0em 0.2em;">talk 19:27, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
 * I certainly appreciate your many contributions to Wikipedia. I see that you have written numerous articles, and done great work here. I did not think that you uploaded the book covers without some thought to the non-free content policy. However, the policy/explanatory guideline do not allow book covers to be used in articles about their authors, even if they are iconic, without some sourced commentary on them. I would love to be proven wrong, but I don't think there is any other reading of the policy. Thanks, Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 19:36, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
 * The magic word is "sourced commentary" which you have already stated. In fact, the Non-free content confirms that also (quote): the NFCC criteria typically require that the cover art itself be significantly discussed within the article. For historical information, see RfC Jan 2011, RfC Sep 2012, and RfC Dec 2012. — So please follow the same rule in your own future nominations; because "significantly discussed" means different things in different articles depending on their size. Thanks in advance,  Poeticbent  <span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-size:7.0pt;font-weight:bold;background:#FF88AF;border:1px solid #DF2929;padding:0.0em 0.2em;">talk 21:36, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Poeticbent!
<div style="border: 3px solid #FFD700; background-color: #FFFAF0; padding:0.2em 0.4em;height:173px;border-radius: 1em; box-shadow: 0.1em 0.1em 0.5em rgba(0,0,0,0.75);" class="plainlinks">

Happy New Year! Poeticbent, Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.

– Davey 2010 Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 13:30, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.


 * Thank you, . Happy New Year to you too! All best, and keep up the good work!  Poeticbent  <span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-size:7.0pt;font-weight:bold;background:#FF88AF;border:1px solid #DF2929;padding:0.0em 0.2em;">talk 16:22, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Poeticbent!
<div style="border: 3px solid #FFD700; background-color: #FFFAF0; padding:0.2em 0.4em;height:173px;border-radius: 1em; box-shadow: 0.1em 0.1em 0.5em rgba(0,0,0,0.75);" class="plainlinks">

Happy New Year! Poeticbent, Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.

– Davey 2010 Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 13:30, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.


 * Thank you, . Happy New Year to you too! All best, and keep up the good work!  Poeticbent  <span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-size:7.0pt;font-weight:bold;background:#FF88AF;border:1px solid #DF2929;padding:0.0em 0.2em;">talk 16:22, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Link From BBC
Anne Frank link' unearthed at Sobibor camp --Woogie10w (talk) 12:42, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

WW2 casualties
I have the original documents in my files to support the Polish WW2 casualties. What you see there is a brief summary of the original Polish sources. I can provide jpgs. Anyway in accounting we underline totals. It gives clarity to a financial statement. --Woogie10w (talk) 22:20, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
 * You did a great job with this article, . I'm impressed! But I would advise against underlining totals. Never saw this in any professional book of history.  Poeticbent  <span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-size:7.0pt;font-weight:bold;background:#FF88AF;border:1px solid #DF2929;padding:0.0em 0.2em;">talk 22:24, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
 * In World War II casualties of Poland about half of all numbers are enclosed in round brackets. I have no idea what it means.  Poeticbent  <span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-size:7.0pt;font-weight:bold;background:#FF88AF;border:1px solid #DF2929;padding:0.0em 0.2em;">talk 22:36, 18 January 2017 (UTC) Round brackets indicate the numbers are subtracted, I crunched numbers for 35 years, thats the way management wanted to see things. --Woogie10w (talk) 22:54, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

I believe that I followed generally the accepted rules for formatting negative numbers. See When do you put parentheses around a number? --Woogie10w (talk) 23:15, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

I am so glad to get your feedback re: Polish casualties. My goal has been to outline the details in Polish sources for casualties. Unfortunately most English language academic sources cite a single solitary figure of casualties without providing an explanation of the details or even its source. I can provide jpgs. of the sources in the article.--Woogie10w (talk) 23:25, 18 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the link. Now I understand, what the round brackets mean. Please include in the legend an explanation, sort of like this: LEGEND: An amount in parentheses indicates a negative amount (a negative balance). Thanks in advance,  Poeticbent  <span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-size:7.0pt;font-weight:bold;background:#FF88AF;border:1px solid #DF2929;padding:0.0em 0.2em;">talk 23:32, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Speaking of English language academic sources, here's what I found. World War II: The Definitive Encyclopedia and Document Collection [5 volumes] by Spencer C. Tucker (2016). Please take a look. Page 368 in Google Books. There are four numbers there given for Poland.  Poeticbent  <span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-size:7.0pt;font-weight:bold;background:#FF88AF;border:1px solid #DF2929;padding:0.0em 0.2em;">talk 00:05, 19 January 2017 (UTC)


 * I need to review the Polish WW2 casualties to make sure that the links are fresh and copyedit to clean up any errors. --Woogie10w (talk) 10:47, 19 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Re the Soviet figures I tried to be brief and avoid posting my own analysis, just the data published from the Soviet 1946 report in the Polian book. However the Soviet archives have five sets of data summarizing the figures of the  Extraordinary State Commission data that does not agree.  Off Wiki my analysis concluded that the Moscow number crunchers  in 1946 made up numbers in order to agree to a figure given to them for the beginning and ending population (1941/1945).  The numbers are rough estimates more than likely based on ration card data.--Woogie10w (talk) 01:38, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

i Link
Whoops! I acted a little brash when I made those edits it appears. My apologies. Thank you for bringing it to my attention. I will avoid the same mistake in the future. DaltonCastle (talk) 19:21, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
 * No sweat. Always glad to help,  Poeticbent  <span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-size:7.0pt;font-weight:bold;background:#FF88AF;border:1px solid #DF2929;padding:0.0em 0.2em;">talk 20:24, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey
Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 08:25, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Diocesan Museum in Pelplin
Mifter (talk) 00:01, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Precious five years!
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:17, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Władysław Mazurkiewicz (1911-1957).jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Władysław Mazurkiewicz (1911-1957).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:54, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

A kitten for you!
We miss you! I hope you are ok?

<sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 05:40, 30 May 2017 (UTC) <br style="clear: both;"/>

Orphaned non-free image File:Striking women demonstration in Łódź, 1971.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Striking women demonstration in Łódź, 1971.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:38, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Since the talk of this image identifies an error I concur with (mislabeled 1981 event) I think we can lose this image. Better no image than a clearly incorrect one. --<sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 05:43, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Zenon Kliszko.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Zenon Kliszko.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the file description page and add the text   below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing   with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
 * 2) On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:45, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

Still waiting
For your return. We miss you! --<sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 06:05, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Robin O'Neil - Rabka Four (2011).jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Robin O'Neil - Rabka Four (2011).jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the file description page and add the text   below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing   with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
 * 2) On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:56, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thanks, .  Poeticbent  <span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-size:7.0pt;font-weight:bold;background:#FF88AF;border:1px solid #DF2929;padding:0.0em 0.2em;">talk 14:14, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

Fire of Kraków
My newest article, to be DYKed in few somethings, is Kraków-related, so I thought you may enjoy checking it out. Cheers, --<sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 11:36, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

Haven't forgotten...
Just busy dealing with a client who keeps deciding they need a few more photographs of jewelry...each time I think we're done, it's "I have a few more pieces..." and, hey, who can't use more money, right? Ealdgyth - Talk 22:00, 28 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Britmusdegraillysignetring.jpg I'm not surprised one bit that your skills are in such high demand.  Poeticbent  <span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-size:7.0pt;font-weight:bold;background:#FF88AF;border:1px solid #DF2929;padding:0.0em 0.2em;">talk  22:28, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

Move review
An editor has asked for a Move review of Grand Duchy of Kraków. Because you participated in the requested move, you might want to participate in the move review. Academicoffee71 (talk) 05:02, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

One more help
Can you please redirect Cambodian Vietnamese War to Cambodian–Vietnamese War ? Camb17 (talk) 04:14, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
 * ✅.  Poeticbent  <span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-size:7.0pt;font-weight:bold;background:#FF88AF;border:1px solid #DF2929;padding:0.0em 0.2em;">talk 04:58, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

Talk time
Hi, Poeticbent. Any Talk page is appropriate to discuss things. Your page, my page, their page, Jimmmy Wales' page. Your statement that the article page is the correct page, is ... incorrect. LOL

Moving my comment to another page is not permitted per WP:TPG. At this point, I would like you to delete the comment on the article Talk page. It was you that stated that you did not know what I meant, so I came here, to explain it to you, and to work it out, with you. Nobody else. LOL. Ping me back. Cheers! 05:37, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Stefan Maechler - Der Fall Wilkomirski (2000).jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Stefan Maechler - Der Fall Wilkomirski (2000).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:08, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

Your signature
Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated a  tag, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors. Worse, the  tag wraps around a Wikilink, which causes Tidy bug affecting font tags wrapping links lint errors. This tidy bug is that, in effect,
 * → bar

is processed as
 * → bar

and this treatment is considered to be incorrect and eventually Wikipedia will no longer make this adjustment; it will work the same as
 * → bar

You are encouraged to change
 * →  Poeticbent  <span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-size:7.0pt;font-weight:bold;background:#FF88AF;border:1px solid #DF2929;padding:0.0em 0.2em;">talk

to
 * →  Poeticbent  <span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-size:7.0pt;font-weight:bold;background:#FF88AF;border:1px solid #DF2929;padding:0.0em 0.2em;">talk

(There is a limit of around 250 characters in the signature, and this signature is just below the limit. Ordinarily, the  markup prefers a space after colons and between separating semicolons, and a semicolon at the end, but these are not strictly required and if used would put your signature over the limit. The signature line
 * →  Poeticbent  <span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-size:7.0pt;font-weight:bold;background:#FF88AF;border:1px solid #DF2929;padding:0.0em 0.2em;">talk

would work, except that it is three characters too long.)

—Anomalocaris (talk) 07:10, 10 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Hi, . As soon as I read you message I went to check out your talk page as well; and, I found it superbly entertaining, especially the long exchanges. I'm impressed. Speaking of which, personally, I prefer to use single spaces between sentences in the editing window. When there's a double space after a full stop, I suspect an invisible character there, and usually fix it without much deliberation. Thanks for the tip, all done.  Poeticbent  <span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-size:7.0pt;font-weight:bold;background:#FF88AF;border:1px solid #DF2929;padding:0.0em 0.2em;">talk 11:27, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your support for eliminating lint errors from Wikipedia! —Anomalocaris (talk) 18:12, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

Vietnam
Hi, glad to see you are back. WW2 is not too bad when it comes to POV re. casualties. I remember the Vietnam days when the POV pushers were claiming US genocide, the disputes were real intense. The Canadians were involved too, 30,000 served with US in the NAM. I stay away from Vietnam on Wikipedia--Woogie10w (talk) 18:08, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

Sobibor film link
Hello Poeticbent! I am not sure I quite understand your point of not including a hat on Sobibór extermination camp to Sobibor (film). My understanding is that if a reader is looking for information about the film and they search for "Sobibor", the proper title for the film, they will end up at the former article. To redirect them to the correct article, we use hatnotes. How else is a reader supposed to find the article, unless they understand the inner-machinations of Wikipedia naming policy. BOVINEBOY 2008 13:06, 19 November 2017 (UTC)


 * I'm not against linking the film from within (whenever appropriate) but a death camp is a real, physical location ... and a place of unspeakable horrors, not a 'horror' film or any other film yet to be released (quote from WP:HATNOTE policy): The hatnote should not overload the user with extraneous information...  Poeticbent  <span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-size:7.0pt;font-weight:bold;background:#FF88AF;border:1px solid #DF2929;padding:0.0em 0.2em;">talk 13:46, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Understandable. I will put a link in the See Also section. BOVINEBOY 2008 15:16, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Actually, it seems appropriate to put it in the dramatisation section. BOVINEBOY 2008 15:18, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

Szczuczyn pogrom
I have written my comments, very controversial text.Xx236 (talk) 14:15, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
 * The page was originally published in Ukrainian Wikipedia, where everything is possible.Xx236 (talk) 07:03, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

Of interest
See https://pl.wikiquote.org/wiki/Wikicytaty:Strony_do_usuni%C4%99cia#Pogrom_w_Szczuczynie --<sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 09:20, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

"List of Polish people" captions

 * Since the work done today (12-17-2017) on individuals' photographs and portraits, the captions in many sections are out of kilter.
 * Thanks.
 * Nihil novi (talk) 01:48, 18 December 2017 (UTC)


 * can you please elaborate on that? You must have noticed that the captions are properly i-linked to articles now, they did not work before. It would have been really hard not to notice that I did a great job there, but I need feedback of course in order to complete the assignment successfully.  Poeticbent  <span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-size:7.0pt;font-weight:bold;background:#FF88AF;border:1px solid #DF2929;padding:0.0em 0.2em;">talk  06:04, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Please see "List of Polish people"—"Prose literature". To the right of the photo of Tadeusz Boy-Żeleński you now have "Boy-".  To the left of the photo of Edmund Chojecki you have the rest of Boy's name:  "Żeleński".  Chojecki's name appears over the photo of Tadeusz Dołęga-Mostowicz (whose name is now absent from the list of names).  And so on.
 * I can't think of anything that could better confuse a reader.
 * I'm not sure what previous problem you were trying to solve.
 * Best,
 * Nihil novi (talk) 07:55, 18 December 2017 (UTC)


 * When you see something like this happening just add between the file syntax and the name. The error is caused by a differing width of your monitor. I don't see this on my screen, but I fixed it for you. Images have their own columns different from the text with extra room on each side. The error can also be fixed by making the image column narrower. The main advantage of new formatting is twofold, the internal links finally work, and the corresponding size of font is most appropriate. Another problem solved was the messy image sizes. I repeat, the magic links work, and that is what they are meant to do. Thanks,  Poeticbent  <span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-size:7.0pt;font-weight:bold;background:#FF88AF;border:1px solid #DF2929;padding:0.0em 0.2em;">talk  08:29, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

Happy Holidays

 * Thank you, much appreciated!.  Poeticbent  <span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-size:7.0pt;font-weight:bold;background:#FF88AF;border:1px solid #DF2929;padding:0.0em 0.2em;">talk 04:35, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

--Woogie10w (talk) 18:19, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Your holiday greeting
Your holiday greeting, such as, has an Missing end tag lint error of unclosed italics that should be closed somewhere before the closing. Happy holidays! —Anomalocaris (talk) 18:57, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
 * All ✅. And Happy holidays to you too, ! —  Poeticbent  <span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-size:7.0pt;font-weight:bold;background:#FF88AF;border:1px solid #DF2929;padding:0.0em 0.2em;">talk  19:33, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!
<div style="border-style:solid; border-radius: 32px; border-color:#009600; background: #FFFBC4; border-width:8px; text-align:center; padding:7px; height:260px;" class="plainlinks"> Merry Christmas !!

Hi, I wish you and your family a very Merry Christmas and a very Happy New Year,

Thanks for all your help and contributions on the 'pedia! ,

– Davey 2010 Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 13:50, 23 December 2017 (UTC) <div style="border-style:solid; border-radius: 7px; background: #FFFBC4; border-width:0px; text-align:left; padding:3px; height:26px;">
 * Thank you, . Same to you!  Poeticbent  <span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-size:7.0pt;font-weight:bold;background:#FF88AF;border:1px solid #DF2929;padding:0.0em 0.2em;">talk 14:03, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Best wishes

 * Very best wishes in the new year, as we continue spreading knowledge, which—if anything can—can improve prospects for the future!
 * Nihil novi (talk) 06:36, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you, . Same to you!  Poeticbent  <span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-size:7.0pt;font-weight:bold;background:#FF88AF;border:1px solid #DF2929;padding:0.0em 0.2em;">talk 14:04, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Merry Christmas !!!
<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:blue; background-color:AliceBlue; border-width:1px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks"> CAPTAIN RAJU (T) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding to their talk page with a friendly message.
 * Thank you,, Merry Christmas to you too ! —  Poeticbent  <span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-size:7.0pt;font-weight:bold;background:#FF88AF;border:1px solid #DF2929;padding:0.0em 0.2em;">talk  21:51, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Seasons' Greetings
...to you and yours, from the Great White North! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 16:30, 23 December 2017 (UTC) — Thank you,. Seasons' Greetings from the West Coast !  Poeticbent  <span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-size:7.0pt;font-weight:bold;background:#FF88AF;border:1px solid #DF2929;padding:0.0em 0.2em;">talk 21:56, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Poeticbent!
<div style="border: 3px solid #FFD700; background-color: #FFFAF0; padding:0.2em 0.4em;height:173px;border-radius: 1em; box-shadow: 0.1em 0.1em 0.5em rgba(0,0,0,0.75);" class="plainlinks">

Happy New Year! Poeticbent, Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.

– Davey 2010 Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 00:46, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.


 * Happy New Year to you too, !! All best !   Poeticbent  <span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-size:7.0pt;font-weight:bold;background:#FF88AF;border:1px solid #DF2929;padding:0.0em 0.2em;">talk  01:17, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

Is "pączki" an English word?
Hi, thank you for your participation in the recent requested move discussion at Talk:Pączki. I've posted a follow-up question to better understand what the result of that discussion means not only for the article's title, but also for its content. I'd be very greatful, if you could reply at Talk:Pączki — Kpalion(talk) 18:03, 11 January 2018 (UTC)