User talk:Polandersondonegal

The item on Parental Alienation in Ireland is out of date and is missing essential information such as the Minister of Justice Plans and opinions on Parental Alienation 30 parliamentary questions asked at the government on how they will recognise and deal with parental alienation - recent situation where the in camera rule was lifted that highlighted court and social services inadequacy in dealing with parental alienation where children were manipulated to fear their non abusive father and the need for reunification services to deal with this awful situation. WHY is WIkipedia allowing this misinformation to continue?

March 2021
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Parental alienation has been reverted. Your edit here to Parental alienation was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ycz0wUNX4Uc) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. music or video) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 08:29, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Ashleyyoursmile. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Parental alienation, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page.    Ashley  yoursmile!  08:44, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi. I wanted to let you know that Slp1 has started a discussion of the parental alienation content for the Republic of Ireland on the article talk page. Thanks. Arllaw (talk) 19:44, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

An interesting discussion on the people protecting the Parental alienation page
Hello, you may have an opinion about how difficult it is to edit the Parental alienation page. We are addressing the issue and invite your experiences, if you can help. Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents

Thank you, --Frobozz1 (talk) 16:52, 21 March 2021 (UTC)


 * I just added some extremely important information about PASG, "he main international organisation that proposes that the concept of parental alienation is addressed legally, clinically and socially is the Parental Alienation Study Group. It is an international, not-for-profit corporation. PASG has 800 members – mostly mental health and legal professionals – from 62 countries. PASG is an organization open to anyone who reports an interest in the topic of parental alienation—personally, professionally, or both. Many of its members have wrote books or papers on parental alienation. The PASG website contains many resources on parental alienation including a bibliography and much accredited and peer researched information that promotes and proves this concept, that is contentious to so." DELETED !!! 800 professionals from 60 countries and their resources on Parental Alienation IGNORED? WHY? is this CENSORSHIP? Polandersondonegal (talk) 18:56, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

Ireland and Parental Alienation
I want to update this new section that I created so how do I do this with citations etc? This is maddening and so much a waste of time and effort! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Polandersondonegal (talk • contribs) 16:09, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

April 2021
Hi Polandersondonegal! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor&#32;at Parental alienation that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. -- Renat 13:32, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Parental Alienation shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Slp1 (talk) 23:38, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

Question
You wrote; How do I stop my changes from being deleted in the Republic of Ireland Parental Alienation section. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Polandersondonegal (talk • contribs) 23:05, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
 * The short answer is; you can't. That's what you get with a web-based encyclopaedia that "anyone can edit". But, I take it you are referring to this edit you made today. It was reverted shortly after with the edit summary; "see talk page". So, I suspect you will find there was a discussion on the talk page regarding the content of your edit and you should find your answers there. If not, then your next step would be to ask the editor that reverted your edit. Frobozz1 is unlikely to be able to help you as they are currently blocked from discussing that topic on Wikipedia indefinitely. - wolf  00:06, 18 April 2021 (UTC)


 * OK so how do I get this other editor to actually check the information I have put up as the information that is on the article is incorrect - ie 30 not 29 Irish Councils and it is not sited when my version is by a Member of the Irish Government ! Deleted government court case in relation to the issue and a direct quote from an irish government document this is ongoing censorship! How can I resolve this with a third party who is objective as this editor obviously isnt — Preceding unsigned comment added by Polandersondonegal (talk • contribs) 00:08, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
 * You go to the article talk page and discuss it with them. That's what the article talk pages are for. I just looked and I see that they have been trying to engage you in discussion, so it would be best if you would go there now and join in. If you find you can't come to an agreement, then check out your options via dispute resolution. I would caution you against going to individual user pages and seeking allies in any content disputes, that is called canvassing and it's not permitted. Also, please learn to indent your talk page posts (it's easy, just add cumulative colons before each post). And very important; please sign your posts. It's also easy, just add four tildes ( ~ ) at the end or click the signature icon on your tool bar. Thanks -  wolf  00:21, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Where do I engage with them wolf?Polandersondonegal (talk) 07:32, 18 April 2021 (UTC)polandersondonegal THANKS Polandersondonegal (talk) 07:32, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
 * It appears they are trying to engage you at Talk:Parental alienation. That looks like the place to go. - wolf  07:40, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
 * ...and it seems you found it. A few minor points; always post your comments at the bottom of the thread, not in the middle, (and not in the middle of others editors posts). Always sign at the end of your post, not the beginning, and conversely, if pinging a specific editor, (using, for example, the " " template, which creates "@"), always place that at the beginning of your post. You must have both the ping template and your signature added when you save the post, or the ping won't work. Adding one after, or trying to fix one after won't work either. (see Help:Fixing failed pings for more info). Oh, and don't get to carried away with the indents (ie: getting up to 10 or 12 colons :::::::::::: or more. Before you hit say... 10, it's usually better to start over with the "outdent" template; . (I used one on your post @07:43, 18 April 2021, in the "Ireland section" discussion on the Talk:Parental alienation page). After that, you start over with the increasing numbers of colons again, starting at one. Hope you find all of this useful, you will need it for any talk page discussions you take part in. If you ever get stuck, just contact the Help Desk and they'll sort you out. Good luck -  wolf  09:02, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
 * ......................... Sorry I am not a computer expert and omg this is so so over complicated !!! no wonder this article is so shabby!!! It is so off putting and un user friendly plus their should be an objective person to edit not one who has an agenda to subvert reality what is real not what is effectively censored! Where is the freedom of Expression. I think I will give up as the Establishment  wants and leave that un representative article float in hyperspace!
 * Thanks wolf anyways:-) polandersondonegal Polandersondonegal (talk) 09:10, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Nah, don't give up. The talk page stuff is really not that difficult. As for the article stuff, it's just a content dispute. Keep a level head, keep in mind this is an encyclopaedia, not a forum, or bulletin board or journal, etc. You guys are discussing, which is good. Try to find some middle ground if you can. Don't try to get everything changed at once, work on small things, one at a time. If you get stuck, then go to dispute resolution, and start with something like 3rd Opinion. But don't forget about the Help Desk and the Teahouse, they are both quite helpful. Also, you could consider being wp:adopted by a wp:mentor, that could be a huge help for you. You would be paired up with an experienced editor who will personally oversee you as you (in general) learn the ropes, and (specifically) deal with your content dispute. There's a lengthy list of people, with at least two dozen of them currently ready and willing to take on a new user and guide them along, sorta' like an apprentice. Anyway, don't quit! Wikipedia needs editors. There's all kinds of things you can try here, just pick one and go for it. - wolf  09:50, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Wolf thanks for going that extra yard :-) Polandersondonegal (talk) 17:05, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

CENSORSHIP on WIkipedia is being allowed? WHY?
I just added some extremely important information about PASG, "he main international organisation that proposes that the concept of parental alienation is addressed legally, clinically and socially is the Parental Alienation Study Group. It is an international, not-for-profit corporation. PASG has 800 members – mostly mental health and legal professionals – from 62 countries. PASG is an organization open to anyone who reports an interest in the topic of parental alienation—personally, professionally, or both. Many of its members have wrote books or papers on parental alienation. The PASG website contains many resources on parental alienation including a bibliography and much accredited and peer researched information that promotes and proves this concept, that is contentious to so." DELETED !!! 800 professionals from 60 countries and their resources on Parental Alienation IGNORED? WHY? is this CENSORSHIP? Polandersondonegal (talk) 18:57, 3 July 2021 (UTC)


 * This is blatantly promotional. Wikipedia is not a place to advertise for any particular group or talk up their accomplishments. - MrOllie (talk) 12:25, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

July 2021
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Parental alienation. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Notfrompedro (talk) 19:01, 3 July 2021 (UTC)


 * This was pure information about the main Activism group in the world on Parental Alienation- how would you like me to enter in this valid information so that it meets your concerns please? Polandersondonegal (talk) 19:04, 3 July 2021 (UTC)


 * It was blatantly promotional like the other edits you have been warned about on this talk page. Perhaps it is time to step back and accept that this is a subject you may be unable to edit from a neutral point of view. Notfrompedro (talk) 19:07, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
 * It is not neutral to remove the main activism group and their details on the issue that they are actively trying to address.. I believe that your not the neutral party here ? Polandersondonegal (talk) 19:09, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
 * https://pasg.info/member-sites/ look at their credentials please- https://pasg.info/books/ books written by PASG members - Resources on PA - https://pasg.info/resources/ Polandersondonegal (talk) 19:12, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
 * May I get a mediator please? Polandersondonegal (talk) 18:10, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
 * So naming 3 anti Parental Alienation organisations is not biased? Gives an objective picture NO! My edit IS NOT PROMOTIONAL MATERIAL but FACTUAL INFORMATION for anyone interested in learning about Parental Alienation - The main international organisation that proposes that the concept of parental alienation is addressed legally, clinically and socially is the Parental Alienation Study Group. It is an international, not-for-profit corporation. PASG has 800 members – mostly mental health and legal professionals – from 62 countries. PASG is an organization open to anyone who reports an interest in the topic of parental alienation—personally, professionally, or both. Many of its members have wrote books or papers on parental alienation. The PASG website contains many resources on parental alienation including a bibliography and much accredited and peer researched information that promotes and proves this concept, that is contentious to some. Polandersondonegal (talk) 18:09, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision diffs
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting. Thanks! -- Renat 08:05, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. MrOllie (talk) 12:23, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for promotion or advertising, as you did at Parental alienation. Notfrompedro (talk) 17:24, 4 July 2021 (UTC)


 * So once you mention say Women's Aid or Greenpeace etc you are advertising? Really? it is the same thing is it not? Polandersondonegal (talk) 11:13, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

October 2021
Your recent editing history at Parental alienation shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.Please recall that you have previously been cautioned about the importance of consensus, edit warring and the three-revert rule. Arllaw (talk) 18:14, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

Is there any point in me editing articles if they are censored? So by blocking me you wil only prove that the editors of this page are biased and do not want the information on this page to be updated and to reflect the issue and how it is not only mainstreaming but is one that is being identified politically, socially and politically as one that needs to reflected on / discussed and addressed especially as it is a child abuse and coercive control issue. It is wrng to censor this issue and by not allowing the public to be properly informed. every addition I put on recently was properly cited and involved either legal decisions - laws or a government minister yet they were deleted. Nevermind the fact that it is misleading and a lie to state that " in 2020, for the first time in a child access case a judge described a parent's actions as "parental alienation" as cases are in camera as BAILLI https://www.bailii.org/cgi-bin/format.cgi?doc=/ie/cases/IEHC/2011/H543.html&query=(Parental)+AND+(Alienation) proves in 2011.

MALTA & GIBRALTER

AS you can see there is not information about Parental Alienation in Malta or Gibralter as it has been deleted - information used was basically quoted and cited from indepemndent newspaper sources see https://timesofmalta.com/articles/view/government-appointed-committee-to-raise-awareness-of-parental.844833 and https://www.gbc.gi/news/statement-minister-justice-and-equality-samantha-sacramento-parental-alienation

So to anyone who wants to know about Parental Alienation in those countries and many more are left to believe that Parental Alienatin is not a problem or that it dos not exist - how can you remove a biased editor who is misinforming wikipedia users by deleting and omitting useful objective information?

PARENTAL ALIENATION AWARNESS DAY? Can this please be allowed to be entered? April 25 is Parental Alienation Awareness Day (PAAD) in the USA, Canada, Bermuda and many other countries. This awareness day was created as a part of global awareness campaign about parental alienation. Last year it was marked in Ireland by the Roman Catholic Church where it was read out in a homily throughout the 32 Counties of Ireland (North & South). "Next Sunday, April 25th, is the International Parental Alienation Awareness day. This day highlights a particular form of domestic abuse that manifests itself in more subtle ways than physical or sexual violence. Parental alienation is a problem that has garnered increasing coverage by the media in recent times. On 20th March the Irish Examiner devoted considerable coverage to the issue in an extensive article titled ‘Parental alienation: Some days you wake up and think: ‘It’s like a living bereavement’, that included the views of a psychotherapist, a female and a male victim, and a solicitor. https://www.armagharchdiocese.org/homily-of-bishop-michael-router-at-mass-for-the-third-sunday-of-easter-preparing-for-international-parental-alienation-awareness-day/

December 2021
(Copying my response to your talkpage to make sure that you see it)

Polandersondonegal, to answer your question about somebody to help "mediate", you can try one of the methods described here WP:DR. In particular, a request for comment WP:RFC might be a way to go. Honestly I don't think it will be worth your while, because your edits are reverted because they go against multiple policies that have been pointed to you over and over again e.g. WP:RS;WP:RSMED; WP:V; WP:RGW and outside objective editors will tell you exactly the same thing.

But consider this a final warning too. If you again edit this or other article in the way you have been, ignoring again WP's policies and guidelines that have been carefully and patiently explained to you, I will ask for administrative action against you.Slp1 (talk) 22:24, 30 December 2021 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright
Hello Polandersondonegal! Your additions to Brian Anderson (Irish boxer) have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. You copied the content of your recent edit almost word for word from this copyrighted source. . While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Donating copyrighted materials.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page.' Thank you. Slp1 (talk) 14:39, 2 January 2022 (UTC)


 * I have no problem with this as I am on a learning curve here. I can get his son my cousin to do a proper write up on him. Polandersondonegal (talk) 15:08, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks for accepting this with good grace.  It is probably best if his son does not expand the article, because he has a conflict of interest WP:COI with the topic.  As a gesture of goodwill I will work on the article myself in the next few days. Slp1 (talk) 17:32, 2 January 2022 (UTC)