User talk:Poledlimps

A request for information about your previous accounts
Please list all the previous accounts you have used. JBW (talk) 18:52, 10 September 2021 (UTC)


 * why? Poledlimps (talk) 18:54, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Because unfortunately we get many people using multiple accounts for dishonest purpose, and so policy is that alternative accounts should be disclosed unless there are exceptional reasons for not doing so. It is also in your own interest to be open about your other account or accounts, because if you won't do so, any impression that you are using multiple accounts for deceptive purposes will be more likely to be taken seriously. JBW (talk) 19:38, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

JBW (talk) 19:38, 11 September 2021 (UTC) i have previous accounts Poledlimps (talk) 20:42, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
 * What accounts are they? JBW (talk) 15:12, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

a lot, and I don't remember
 * In view of what I have seen that seems improbable, but I'll give you the benefit of the doubt for now. However, how many of them are blocked from editing? (If you don't know exactly a rough estimate will be acceptable.) JBW (talk) 15:19, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

some of them Poledlimps (talk) 15:23, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

September 2021
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to User have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:14, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: User was changed by Poledlimps (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.89798 on 2021-09-12T03:14:20+00:00

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at User. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. Firefangledfeathers (talk) 03:22, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Izno (talk) 00:50, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Samsara. jp×g 01:06, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Poledlimps


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Poledlimps, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ev iolite  (talk)  17:36, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Persistent. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:07, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Persistent was changed by Poledlimps (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.860637 on 2021-09-12T18:07:28+00:00

Your submission at Articles for creation: The pandemic (September 13)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by JalenFolf was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The pandemic and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:The pandemic, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:The_pandemic Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:JalenFolf&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:The_pandemic reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jalen Folf  (talk)  03:57, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Pandemic (September 13)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by JalenFolf was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Pandemic and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:The Pandemic, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:The_Pandemic Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:JalenFolf&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:The_Pandemic reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jalen Folf  (talk)  03:57, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Template:TFDIPAAAOASRFAPDNMI, you may be blocked from editing. Most of your editing is unconstructive, some of it in such a way as to raise questions as to your intention, and here you step over the line into obvious deliberate vandalism. JBW (talk) 15:16, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.