User talk:Polese Francesco Pol

Speedy deletion nomination of Viable Systems Approach (VSA)®


A tag has been placed on Viable Systems Approach (VSA)®, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. &mdash; RHaworth 20:47, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

Status and Advice
As reviewing administrator, I deleted it: the presentation was promotional, and would need total rewriting. In rewriting, consider the following: There might be an article here. Give it a proper try--this deletion does not prejudice future efforts.  DGG ( talk ) 05:49, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) you need to show notability by references providing substantial coverage from  3rd party independent published reliable sources, print or online, but not blogs or press releases, or material derived from press releases. Third party means from those not advocates of the system. It is possible that a few of the cited articles will in fact do that, but they are mixed in among a large number that are either by the proponents on the system, or are unpublished reports.
 * 2) you need to describe the system, not say how good it is. You do not need to give the full name or abbreviation of the system in every paragraph. Try "it" or "this method of analysis"
 * 3) every paragraph at least of the article must be cited exactly, and must not be copied from any previously published work. Table 1 in particular is too large a section for fair use under our practices, and must be rewritten.
 * 4) You also need to write like an encyclopedia article, not an academic textbook or lecture handout. Avoid jargon.  Be specific, not vague. Follow our style. Be concise. Omit needless words and phrases, and empty rhetoric.   Write in paragraphs, not bulleted lists. Wikipedia is not powerpoint.