User talk:Policepowers

Regarding edits to Craig Cheffins
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, Policepowers! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule facebook\.com\/.+, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links guidelines for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! AntiSpamBot 02:39, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

Craig Cheffins
Stop adding negative unsourced material immediately about Craig Cheffins. Facebook does not count as a valid source. You have been reverted, and yet, you re-add the material. If you do this again, you will be blocked from editing. --Rob 09:45, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Your vandalism, "Rob", will not be tolerated. Apparently you're a Liberal hack with no knowledge of what is going on at Mount Royal College, and what is about to go public. Check out the Facebook page yourself - these are REAL students, with REAL names. These are the students who have been let down by Mr. Cheffins, apparently. In addition, Career Services - Cheffins employer - has all of Cheffins correspondence as it was never claimed. This is certainly Wikipedia-worthy. Wikipedia isn't merely a public relations tool but is meant to reflect truth. The students ill affected by Cheffins are not afraid to come forward, and they have. Policepowers 05:10, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm afraid Rob is correct here; until the movement is mentioned in reliable mainstream media, it shouldn't appear in an encyclopedia article. For more information, you may wish to take a look at the policies on verifiability and reliable sources.  Feel free to contact me on my talk page if I can be of further assistance and welcome to Wikipedia! Shell babelfish 14:07, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

The "3RR" Three Revert Rule
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors.

Please read: Three-revert rule


 * An editor must not perform more than three reverts, in whole or in part, on a single page within a 24-hour period. A revert means undoing the actions of another editor, whether involving the same or different material each time.

Any editor who breaches the rule may be blocked from editing for up to 24 hours in the first instance, and longer for repeated or aggravated violations.

Your edits on the article Craig Cheffins are at issue. You may not have been aware of this rule as a new user on Wikipedia.OfficeGirl 11:28, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
 * In addition to the technical 3RR issue, there is definitely a concern that your edits violate the policy on biographies of living persons and the principle Wikipedia is not a tabloid. Until there is significant third-party coverage of this issue, it has no business on Wikipedia. Please don't re-insert it or your account will have to be blocked from editing. Thank you, Pascal.Tesson 15:26, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below. - TexasAndroid 15:41, 18 September 2007 (UTC)