User talk:Politicalloser

November 2015
Hello, I'm Velella. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Yasmin Qureshi without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I have restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  Velella  Velella Talk 16:40, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Yasmin Qureshi‎, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.  Velella  Velella Talk 16:48, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia is not censored
Please exercise great care in your editing to "improve" the article on Yasmin Qureshi‎. There may be arguments for removing some material but such arguments would only relate to the significance of the material and the reliability of the source. What you have been removing seems both relevant (this person is an MP) and appropriately sourced. Wikipedia does not knowingly host whitewashed biographies. Anyone is free to edit here and provided that what is added is relevant and sourced, then that is fine. What you are currently doing looks like censorship and this could end with you losing your editing privileges if you persist. Please also read WP:3RR. This strongly recommends discussing issues on the article talk page if your edit is reverted. It is not prudent to continue down the same editing line with reaching consensus first.  Velella  Velella Talk 16:56, 9 November 2015 (UTC)


 * ...and one other important issue. From your edit summaries, it is reasonable to infer that you have a conflict on interest in writing this article. I would be very surprised if you were the subject of the article, that would be political naïvety on a grand scale - but it has happened before with very senior British politicians. However, only a person in the inner circle could reasonably claim that the M.P's personal assistant had communicated with Wikipedia - either that or the whole thing is a lie. It would therefore be prudent to clarify your involvement on your user page and in future restrict your editing on pages where you have a conflict of interest to making suggestions on the article talk page and leave it up to others to decide whether to take up your suggestions or not.  Velella  Velella Talk  18:52, 9 November 2015 (UTC)