User talk:Politicalwizard2000

Strokin' moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to Strokin'. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back.  141 Pr  {contribs} 18:14, 1 January 2024 (UTC)


 * The sources are there, i just have to add them. It will be hard not having a computer to do it on due to me being on mobile Politicalwizard2000 (talk) 18:25, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Thanks for letting me know. You can always ping me if you want help with the draft or review it.  141 Pr  {contribs} 18:17, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Strokin' (January 3)
. Add even a small amount of prose and the article will be accepted.


 * reason2=|details2=|comment=|sig=yes}}

Your submission at Articles for creation: Strokin' has been accepted
 Strokin', which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Strokin%27 help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! –&#8239;Joe (talk) 08:33, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

April 2024
Hello, I'm C.Fred. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Template:2024CARep, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 19:04, 2 April 2024 (UTC)


 * I accidently put the wrong person. But I'm curious if write in votes count, thats why I tried to add them Politicalwizard2000 (talk) 19:06, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
 * You'd need a source for the write-ins. —C.Fred (talk) 20:09, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

Disruptive behavior
Hello. I kindly ask that you respect the consensus building process on the presidential election pages. The onus is on you to get consensus; there is no consensus on adding RFKJR to states where he lacks ballot access and/or *consistent* polling above 5%. Also, attacking a user because of their nationality goes against the spirt of WP:CIVIL. Prcc27 (talk) 15:21, 13 May 2024 (UTC)


 * It's really strange that you are insistent on removing Kennedy. Politicalwizard2000 (talk) 15:25, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
 * If I am so insistent on removing him, why did I add him to the California and Michigan infoboxes? Prcc27 (talk) 15:30, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

May 2024
Hello, I'm LunaEclipse. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Million Dollar Baby (Tommy Richman song) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Please ignore this warning, I went after the wrong person. 🌙E cl i ps e (talk) (contribs) 00:07, 21 May 2024 (UTC)


 * no worries lmao, take care Politicalwizard2000 (talk) 00:40, 21 May 2024 (UTC)

Synth-funk
@Politicalwizard2000: Let me explain. The first source you mentioned in the article's history (Complex) doesn't mention at least synths. Rate Your Music is not reliable (See WP:RATEYOURMUSIC). Thanks for reading. Santi (talk) 19:55, 22 May 2024 (UTC)


 * bro its literally synth-funk, people love to not label synth-funk correctly Politicalwizard2000 (talk) 00:22, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Then create your own magazine of music journalism and hire those you consider professionals. Or rather, wait from heaven for a reliable review that supports you (sorry for the sarcasm, but, as Laje said, "esto es demasiado"; Wikipedia is not a space in which you put information according to what you think, but rather according to what professional media that are RELIABLE say). Santi (talk) 02:47, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
 * don't need to be an asshole lmao Politicalwizard2000 (talk) 09:50, 23 May 2024 (UTC)