User talk:Politikk

Disambiguation link notification for May 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
 * Government of the Soviet Union ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Government_of_the_Soviet_Union check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Government_of_the_Soviet_Union?client=notify fix with Dab solver])
 * added a link pointing to Congress of People's Deputies
 * List of governments of the Soviet Union ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/List_of_governments_of_the_Soviet_Union check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/List_of_governments_of_the_Soviet_Union?client=notify fix with Dab solver])
 * added a link pointing to Congress of People's Deputies

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 18 May 2019 (UTC)

Council of People's Commissars of the Soviet Union
Since you seem unwilling to follow WP:BRD, here's a straight warning: your edit has been challenged. Until consensus is reached on the talk page, you do NOT get to force your preferred version through. I will revert to the previous version; if you remove the text again, I will report you for edit-warring. Now be a darling and discuss. FWIW, it seems to me that the article contains a fair amount of material that is not present in the redirect target, and thsu this should to be at least a merge. -- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 16:54, 18 May 2019 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet

 * Wow.

Just saw the page. Some of these arguements are rather strange. See this June 2010, this September 2010 or this also September 2010 This person also commented on my user page here for example. Back in 2010 I was involved in a discussion here (I was using the User name Harry Potter at the time)" ... and "Repeated assertions that they are right and other people are wrong See here for example" (when you are right you usually assert you're right... right?) .... "Swearing and using capital letters for emphasis." Is that unormal?
 * "An obsession with redirecting pages concerned with various People's Commissariats to Ministries of the Soviet Union:
 * Considering that these "proofs" are so vague how can I disprove them? --Politikk (talk) 07:06, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
 * So how can I do that? --Politikk (talk) 12:58, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure that you can. All I can suggest is that you read WP:GAB to learn how to craft an acceptable unblock request. You are free to make another request, but simply denying sockpuppetry never works(as then all actual sockpuppeteers and block evaders would just deny it to be unblocked). If you are TIAYN, you will need to request unblock from that account. 331dot (talk) 14:28, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
 * But since I'm not TIAYN ............... --Politikk (talk) 14:56, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
 * An unblock process shouldn't be impossible to put to an end especially if its founded on guess work. Its feels like Im not being given a free hearing and I feel that to be very sad.. There has to be one way or another you can prove that I am the person you say I am. --Politikk (talk) 14:59, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
 * I've said all I can say about this. You are free to make another request, for someone else to review. 331dot (talk) 17:55, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Yes, but It seems rather pointless since you're saying "You can't prove it. Denying it won't work. We think its you. Good luck!" Is this really the best procedure WP has to offer? --Politikk (talk) 20:54, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

unblock decline July 8, 2019

 * Can you get them to implement a CheckUser thingydingy? THen this will be solved. --Politikk (talk) 19:55, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
 * A check user can be used to prove a connection, but it cannot prove a non connection. On some Wikimedia projects, an editor's IP addresses may be checked upon their request, typically to prove innocence against a sockpuppet allegation. Such checks are not allowed on the English Wikipedia and such requests will not be granted.  Dlohcierekim (talk) 20:11, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
 * So you're saying its impossible to unblock me? Why event grant me the right to request unblock if its impossible? I am not TAYIN --Politikk (talk) 21:21, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
 * As WP:SOCKBLOCK states, "If you are improperly blocked for sockpuppetry, you should realize that it may not always be easy or even possible to correct the situation." Unless you have other information to share, this is probably the end of the line. 331dot (talk) 21:41, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
 * What information do you need? --Politikk (talk) 21:42, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
 * There is no particular information I am looking for, I'm simply stating the current state of your situation. 331dot (talk) 21:47, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
 * But you would have thought that a user with your responsiblity would take this seriously. Is it really worth losing a good WP contributor just because of a maybe? I will literally give you any information you want, but I have no clue what you want because no one is saying anything at all. --Politikk (talk) 21:50, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
 * I do take this seriously, and you have been given much information about this here and by the sockpuppet investigation. My opinion is unchanged from my decline of your request above; "The evidence seems pretty clear to me that you are TIAYN; if you are not, you will need to address the reasons why we think you are that user better than just a denial." 331dot (talk) 21:59, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
 * What does this even mean?; "if you are not, you will need to address the reasons why we think you are that user better than just a denial". What should I do? Give you my birth name, country, city of origin, send you my CV? That sentence literally only makes sense to you anyone else who speaks the same language as you. How can I defend against extremely vague charges? We apparently have interests in the same thing. What can I do about that? Literally nothing. Its nothing to deny, nothing to argue about. But that's the sole arguement behind the block. It looks like him.
 * You guys have given me much information which literally says one thing; it doesn't matter if its true or not, you have limited abilities to prove yourself and we don't care if we're wrong (that is, better to uphold a wrongful block then letting a sockpuppeter run free). As far as I can tell I havn't received one single solution out of this problem. You gius might feel like you're informed me. But I am the receiver of you're messages and I am as clueless as when I logged inn, tried to edit and saw that I had been blocked. My heart rate actually increased when I saw it. --Politikk (talk) 22:08, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
 * You have been given a solution to this problem; if you are unable or unwilling to follow through with it, there is nothing more to be done here, as policy states. 331dot (talk) 22:14, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
 * In reading and rereading the GAB, my best advice is to email the WP:arbitration committee--

. Sorry I could not be more helpful. Dlohcierekim (talk) 23:31, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Thank you! :) --Politikk (talk) 15:21, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

Unblock
I'm not reviewing this, but you still have not addressed the fact that there is technical information to support the block. 331dot (talk) 10:33, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
 * The problem here is that I've been accused of being a user because I have likeness to the user - that is my understanding of the technical details. I honestly don't know how to refute that. Or are the other technical details I should know about? :) --Politikk (talk) 11:24, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Only checkusers are privy to the exact technical information(even regular admins like me are not) and they can only talk in vague generalities as to what the technical information is. 331dot (talk) 11:29, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
 * The problem Yamla is that Arbcom said I could only be blocked here. And "There's nothing new here"... Doesn't that arguement fall flat when its proven if you ask at Norwegian Wikipedia that I function (if not well) averagely? Or doesn't that count? What counts? What do you want? I mean, I could have established a new account a long time ago. It would have been easier. Just editing Indian history instead of Cuban and Russian :P But I haven't. Isn't that proof? --Politikk (talk) 11:38, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

Yes, but how can I defend myself from unknown accusations? You are really making that hard for me --Politikk (talk) 11:38, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
 * There's nothing we can do for you here. We simply aren't equipped to review blocks like this, given both the behavioural and technical evidence noted in Sockpuppet investigations/Trust Is All You Need/Archive. ArbCom is. --Yamla (talk) 14:17, 6 February 2020 (UTC)